Literature DB >> 22818887

The effect of coping/veneer thickness on the fracture toughness and residual stress of implant supported, cement retained zirconia and metal-ceramic crowns.

Christopher S Millen1, Robert L Reuben, Richard J Ibbetson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the work was to assess the influence of coping and veneer thickness on the fracture resistance of porcelain-metal and porcelain-zirconia crowns in a clinically representative model.
METHODS: A total of 30 zirconia and 30 precious metal copings were fabricated. There were 10 copings in each group of 0.5mm, 1mm and 1.5mm thickness. Each group of 10 was further divided into two groups with a total thickness of three and four millimeters inclusive of veneering ceramic. The specimens were cemented to a titanium abutment with zinc oxide cement and tested using a microindenter. Crack length, hardness and spalling (chipping) were recorded using an optical microscope from which fracture toughness was calculated.
RESULTS: Kruskal-Wallis tests and simple linear regression analysis were used to analyze the results, revealing a significant difference between zirconia (ZrCC) and metal (MCC) specimens for crack length. 0.5mm coping thicknesses and MCC specimens showed the highest fracture toughness values. Simple linear regression analysis showed a limited effect of the overall thickness or veneer thickness on crack length and hardness; however coping thickness showed a positive correlation with both. Spalling was higher in zirconia specimens. Residual stresses were higher for ZrCC specimens and showed a positive correlation with crack length. The ratio of veneer to coping thickness was negatively correlated with residual stress. SIGNIFICANCE: Residual stresses due to thermal mismatch between the coping and the veneering ceramic should be kept to a minimum. The ZrCC specimens were found to have lower apparent fracture toughness than MCC specimens. Thermal mismatch caused a larger drop in apparent fracture toughness than the inherent differences in the materials used.
Copyright © 2012 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22818887     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  6 in total

1.  Mechanical performance of cement- and screw-retained all-ceramic single crowns on dental implants.

Authors:  Matthias Obermeier; Oliver Ristow; Kurt Erdelt; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of failure loads and compressive stress in Press on metal and Press on Y-TZP copings.

Authors:  Fahim Vohra; Mohammed Bin Shuwaish; Modhi Al Deeb; Rana Alhamdan; Naif Alotaibi; Tariq Abduljabbar
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

3.  A comparative evaluation of fracture load of monolithic and bilayered zirconia crowns with and without a cervical collar: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Mainak Kanti Saha; Surbhi Bansal; Vandana Pathak; Shivani Bhardwaj; Astha Chauhan; Amit Singh Nirwan
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2019-04-25

4.  Fatigue Failure Load of Molars with Thin-Walled Prosthetic Crowns Made of Various Materials: A 3D-FEA Theoretical Study.

Authors:  Noor Al Mortadi; Khaled Bataineh; Mohammad Al Janaideh
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2020-12-18

5.  Effects of core characters and veneering technique on biaxial flexural strength in porcelain fused to metal and porcelain veneered zirconia.

Authors:  Ju-Won Oh; Kwang-Yeob Song; Seung-Geun Ahn; Ju-Mi Park; Min-Ho Lee; Jae-Min Seo
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Effect of liner and porcelain application on zirconia surface structure and composition.

Authors:  Tariq F Alghazzawi; Gregg M Janowski
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 6.344

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.