Literature DB >> 22818802

Outcome after VAC® therapy for infected bypass grafts in the lower limb.

S Acosta1, C Monsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcome of vacuum-assisted wound closure (VAC(®)) therapy for infected bypass grafts.
METHODS: A retrospective 7-year review of patient records from 2004 to 2011 of all patients receiving VAC(®) therapy for infected bypass grafts.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with 42 wounds and 45 infected bypass (28 synthetic) grafts received VAC(®) treatment. Two serious bleeding episodes from the suture lines occurred. The median VAC(®) therapy time was 20 days. The proportion of patent bypass grafts was 91% (41/45) at a median time of 3.5 months from the start of VAC(®) therapy. Five patients with seven bypasses had persistent infection or re-infection, and the total graft preservation rate was 76% (34/45). The median follow-up time was 15 months. The presence of two infected bypass grafts in one groin wound was associated with an increased major amputation rate (hazard ratio (HR) 7.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0-27.5]), and synthetic graft infection (HR 5.0 [95% CI 1.5-17.4]) and non-healed wound (HR 3.6 [95% CI 1.5-8.7]) were associated with mortality.
CONCLUSION: VAC(®) therapy of infected bypass grafts was able to induce effective wound healing without compromising the early bypass function. Two infected synthetic bypasses in the wound were associated with the highest risk of adverse outcome.
Copyright © 2012 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22818802     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  7 in total

1.  Revascularisation through the obturator foramen of lower limbs with a compromised ipsilateral groin due to infection.

Authors:  G Zenunaj; L Traina; P Acciarri; C Spataro; V Gasbarro
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Results of Graft Removal and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Management of Graft Infection.

Authors:  Keisuke Miyake; Nobuo Sakagoshi; Katsukiyo Kitabayashi
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2019-01-02

Review 3.  [Aortofemoral vascular graft infections and their prevention].

Authors:  F Taher; O Assadian; K Hirsch; J Falkensammer; C Senekowitsch; A Assadian
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Cost-Utility Analysis: Sartorius Flap versus Negative Pressure Therapy for Infected Vascular Groin Graft Managment.

Authors:  Abhishek Chatterjee; David Macarios; Leah Griffin; Tomasz Kosowski; Bryan J Pyfer; Anaeze C Offodile; Daniel Driscoll; Sirish Maddali; John Attwood
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-12-09

5.  Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Lower Limb Bypass Incisions.

Authors:  Kah Wei Tan; Zhiwen Joseph Lo; Qiantai Hong; Sriram Narayanan; Glenn Wei Leong Tan; Sadhana Chandrasekar
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2017-12-25

6.  Biosynthetic graft failure to replace infected infrainguinal bypass as developing infection due to Morganella morganii leading to disrupture of the anastomosis. Case report.

Authors:  Gladiol Zenunaj; Claudio Spataro; Luca Traina; Vincenzo Gasbarro
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-11-12

7.  Negative pressure wound therapy with intermittent instillation of rifampin for the treatment of an infected vascular bypass graft.

Authors:  Chrisovalantis Lakhiani; Christopher M Fleury; Cara K Black; David E Janhofer; Cameron Akbari; Karen Kim Evans
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2019-10-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.