Literature DB >> 22818773

Analytical method for the identification and assay of 12 phthalates in cosmetic products: application of the ISO 12787 international standard "Cosmetics-Analytical methods-Validation criteria for analytical results using chromatographic techniques".

Pascal Gimeno1, Annie-Françoise Maggio, Claudine Bousquet, Audrey Quoirez, Corinne Civade, Pierre-Antoine Bonnet.   

Abstract

Esters of phthalic acid, more commonly named phthalates, may be present in cosmetic products as ingredients or contaminants. Their presence as contaminant can be due to the manufacturing process, to raw materials used or to the migration of phthalates from packaging when plastic (polyvinyl chloride--PVC) is used. 8 phthalates (DBP, DEHP, BBP, DMEP, DnPP, DiPP, DPP, and DiBP), classified H360 or H361, are forbidden in cosmetics according to the European regulation on cosmetics 1223/2009. A GC/MS method was developed for the assay of 12 phthalates in cosmetics, including the 8 phthalates regulated. Analyses are carried out on a GC/MS system with electron impact ionization mode (EI). The separation of phthalates is obtained on a cross-linked 5%-phenyl/95%-dimethylpolysiloxane capillary column 30 m × 0.25 mm (i.d.) × 0.25 mm film thickness using a temperature gradient. Phthalate quantification is performed by external calibration using an internal standard. Validation elements obtained on standard solutions, highlight a satisfactory system conformity (resolution>1.5), a common quantification limit at 0.25 ng injected, an acceptable linearity between 0.5 μg mL⁻¹ and 5.0 μg mL⁻¹ as well as a precision and an accuracy in agreement with in-house specifications. Cosmetic samples ready for analytical injection are analyzed after a dilution in ethanol whereas more complex cosmetic matrices, like milks and creams, are assayed after a liquid/liquid extraction using ter-butyl methyl ether (TBME). Depending on the type of cosmetics analyzed, the common limits of quantification for the 12 phthalates were set at 0.5 or 2.5 μg g⁻¹. All samples were assayed using the analytical approach described in the ISO 12787 international standard "Cosmetics-Analytical methods-Validation criteria for analytical results using chromatographic techniques". This analytical protocol is particularly adapted when it is not possible to make reconstituted sample matrices.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22818773     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.06.090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  3 in total

Review 1.  Cosmetics as endocrine disruptors: are they a health risk?

Authors:  Polyxeni Nicolopoulou-Stamati; Luc Hens; Annie J Sasco
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Identification of Potential Extractablesand Leachables in Cosmetic Plastic Packagingby Microchambers-Thermal Extraction and Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Pauline Murat; Sowmya Harohalli Puttaswamy; Pierre-Jacques Ferret; Sylvie Coslédan; Valérie Simon
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Machine learning-assisted non-destructive plasticizer identification and quantification in historical PVC objects based on IR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Tjaša Rijavec; David Ribar; Jernej Markelj; Matija Strlič; Irena Kralj Cigić
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.