Literature DB >> 22816314

What's wrong with the debate on mesh surgery?

Hans P Dietz1.   

Abstract

There is an increasingly acrimonious debate surrounding the use of anchored mesh in prolapse surgery. It is evident that clinicians and researchers working with this technology are under pressure from the public, from lawyers, regulators and colleagues. There is a risk that rapidly changing societal standards, championed by colleagues, lawyers and bureaucrats, will interfere with professional independence to such a degree that an entire new technology is lost before there has been time for clinical research to assess risks and benefits properly, before we learn which patients stand to benefit most, and before we get a chance to optimise implant design.
© 2012 The Author ANZJOG © 2012 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22816314     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2012.01467.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  1 in total

1.  Traditional native tissue vs mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature. Comment.

Authors:  B Jacquetin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.894

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.