Literature DB >> 22815322

Advanced heart failure in critical patients (INTERMACS 1 and 2 levels): ventricular assist devices or emergency transplantation?

Matteo Attisani1, Paolo Centofanti, Michele La Torre, Massimo Boffini, Davide Ricci, Marco Ribezzo, Andrea Baronetto, Mauro Rinaldi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: For patients in advanced heart failure, emergency transplantation or ventricular assist devices (VADs) are possible strategies. The aim of this single-centre, retrospective study was to evaluate early and long-term results for these two strategies.
METHODS: From 2005 to 2011, we analysed 49 INTERMACS level 1 and 2 patients, who were divided into the following two groups: group A comprised 26 patients on the waiting list for heart transplantation with urgent conditions; and group B comprised 23 patients who underwent VAD implantation as a bridge to candidacy.
RESULTS: In group A, 25 patients underwent transplantation. In group B, 19 patients were supported with left VAD and four with biventricular VAD. Of these 23 patients, 13 underwent transplantation (mean time 279 ± 196 days). The 30 day mortality was 42.3 and 4.3% in group A and B, respectively. Survival at 6 and 12 months was significantly better in group B than in group A (87 vs 53%, P = 0.018 at 6 months; and 77 vs 48%, P = 0.045 at 12 months).
CONCLUSION: Improved outcomes may justify the use of mechanical assistance devices as a bridge to candidacy or bridge to transplantation in INTERMACS 1 and 2 patients in order to avoid high-risk transplants. Evaluation of long-term multicentre outcomes is needed to assess future strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22815322      PMCID: PMC3445360          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivs256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  13 in total

1.  Projected survival benefit as criterion for listing and organ allocation in heart transplantation.

Authors:  Henry Krakauer; Monica Jia-Yeong Lin; R Clifton Bailey
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.247

2.  Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-third official adult heart transplantation report--2006.

Authors:  David O Taylor; Leah B Edwards; Mark M Boucek; Elbert P Trulock; David A Waltz; Berkeley M Keck; Marshall I Hertz
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  24th Bethesda conference: Cardiac transplantation. Task Force 3: Recipient guidelines/prioritization.

Authors:  G H Mudge; S Goldstein; L J Addonizio; A Caplan; D Mancini; T B Levine; M E Ritsch; L W Stevenson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Who is the high-risk recipient? Predicting mortality after heart transplant using pretransplant donor and recipient risk factors.

Authors:  Kimberly N Hong; Alexander Iribarne; Berhane Worku; Hiroo Takayama; Annetine C Gelijns; Yoshifumi Naka; Val Jeevanandam; Mark J Russo
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Is an emergency heart transplantation justified?

Authors:  A González; A Adsuar; A Hernández; J M Borrego; E Gutiérrez; E Lage; R Hinojosa; A Ordoñez
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  Second INTERMACS annual report: more than 1,000 primary left ventricular assist device implants.

Authors:  James K Kirklin; David C Naftel; Robert L Kormos; Lynne W Stevenson; Francis D Pagani; Marissa A Miller; Karen L Ulisney; J Timothy Baldwin; James B Young
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 10.247

7.  Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation.

Authors:  Leslie W Miller; Francis D Pagani; Stuart D Russell; Ranjit John; Andrew J Boyle; Keith D Aaronson; John V Conte; Yoshifumi Naka; Donna Mancini; Reynolds M Delgado; Thomas E MacGillivray; David J Farrar; O H Frazier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The heart-allocation simulation model: a tool for comparison of transplantation allocation policies.

Authors:  Wilbert B van den Hout; Jacqueline M A Smits; Mario C Deng; Manfred Hummel; Friedrich Schoendube; Hans H Scheld; Guido G Persijn; Gunther Laufer
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-11-27       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Impact of left ventricular assist device bridging on posttransplant outcomes.

Authors:  Jay D Pal; Valentino Piacentino; Angela D Cuevas; Tim Depp; Mani A Daneshmand; Adrian F Hernandez; G Michael Felker; Andrew J Lodge; Joseph G Rogers; Carmelo A Milano
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Differences in early postoperative complications in elective and emergency heart transplantation.

Authors:  J Agüero; I Zarragoikoetxea; L Almenar; F Valera; A Vela; J Porta; L Martínez-Dolz; J L Vicente; T Heredia; J A Montero; A Salvador
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 1.066

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Use of stem cells in heart failure treatment: where we stand and where we are going.

Authors:  Luis A Sánchez; Carlos Enrique Guerrero-Beltrán; Andrea M Cordero-Reyes; Gerardo García-Rivas; Guillermo Torre-Amione
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

Review 2.  Heart transplantation versus left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy or bridge to transplantation for 1-year mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christina A Theochari; George Michalopoulos; Evangelos K Oikonomou; Stefanos Giannopoulos; Ilias P Doulamis; M Alvarez Villela; Damianos G Kokkinidis
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-01

Review 3.  Cellular Therapeutics for Heart Failure: Focus on Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Amitabh C Pandey; Jordan J Lancaster; David T Harris; Steven Goldman; Elizabeth Juneman
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-12-17       Impact factor: 5.443

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.