Literature DB >> 22815250

Initial clinical experience with the Coherex FlatStent™ and FlatStent™ EF PFO closure system for in-tunnel PFO closure: results of the Coherex-EU study.

Horst Sievert1, Nina Wunderlich, Isabel Reiffenstein, Peter Ruygrok, Eberhard Grube, Lutz Buellesfeld, Bernhard Meier, Joachim Schofer, David Muller, Randall K Jones, Linda Gillam.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Coherex-EU Study evaluated the safety and efficacy of PFO closure utilizing novel in-tunnel PFO closure devices.
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) followed the development of transcatheter closure devices designed to patch atrial septal defects (ASDs). The Coherex FlatStent™ and FlatStent™ EF devices were designed specifically to treat PFO anatomy.
METHODS: A total of 95 patients with a clinical indication for PFO closure were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter first in man study at six clinical sites. Thirty-six patients received the first-generation FlatStent study device, and 57 patients received the second-generation FlatStent EF study device, which was modified based on clinical experience during the first 38 cases. Two patients enrolled to receive the first generation did not receive a device.
RESULTS: At 6 months post-procedure, 45% (17/38) of the intention-to-treat (ITT) cohort receiving the first-generation FlatStent device had complete closure, 26% (10/38) had a trivial residual shunt, and 29% (11/38) had a moderate to large residual shunt. In the ITT cohort receiving the second-generation FlatStent EF device, 76% (43/57) had complete closure, 12% (7/57) had a trivial shunt, and 12% had a moderate to large shunt. Five major adverse events occurred, all without sequelae.
CONCLUSION: This initial study of the Coherex FlatStent/FlatStent EF PFO Closure System demonstrated the potential for in-tunnel PFO closure. The in-tunnel Coherex FlatStent EF may offer an alternative to septal repair devices for PFO closure in appropriately selected patients; however, further investigation will be necessary to establish the best use of this device.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial septal defect; congenital heart disease in adults; fistula; patent foramen ovale; shunts

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22815250     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.24565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  3 in total

Review 1.  Patent foramen ovale: anatomical complexity and long-tunnel morphology related issues.

Authors:  Giampiero Vizzari; Fausto Pizzino; Dianne Zwicke; A Jamil Tajik; Scipione Carerj; Gianluca Di Bella; Antonio Micari; Bijoy K Khandheria; Concetta Zito
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2021-06-15

Review 2.  [Interventional closure of atrial septal defects, patent oval foramen and ventricular septal defects].

Authors:  Marius Hornung; Jennifer Franke; Dani Id; Horst Sievert
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Irbaz Bin Riaz; Abhijeet Dhoble; Ahmad Mizyed; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Muhammad Husnain; Justin Z Lee; Kapildeo Lotun; Kwan S Lee
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.298

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.