Literature DB >> 22814837

Optimal cut-off levels of body mass index and waist circumference in relation to each component of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and the number of MetS component.

Tomoyuki Kawada1, Toshiaki Otsuka, Hirofumi Inagaki, Yoko Wakayama, Qing Li, Ying Ji Li, Masao Katsumata.   

Abstract

AIMS: There is an ethnic difference of obesity index to diagnose metabolic syndrome. The authors explored the optimal cut-off levels for body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) in relation to each component of metabolic syndrome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off levels for each component of metabolic syndrome. This study included 4572 workers aged 42.5±9.9 years.
RESULTS: The optimal BMI cut-off values for diabetes mellitus, hypertension or dyslipidemia varied from 23.0 to 24.3 kg/m(2). As for WC, the optimal cut-off values varied from 83.0 to 83.7 cm. The optimal BMI cut-off values relating with one to three components of metabolic syndrome varied from 23.2 to 25.3 kg/m(2). As for WC, the optimal cut-off values varied from 83.0 to 85.0 cm. Pair-wise comparison of ROC curves showed that WC has an advantage in relation to metabolic syndrome and its components compared with BMI. By logistic regression analysis, odds ratios of obesity indices for hypertension, dyslipidemia or the number of metabolic component were all significantly increased. As for diabetes mellitus, odds ratios of BMI ≥25 and WC ≥85 significantly increased, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Japanese criteria of obesity in metabolic syndrome in man may be appropriate for diabetes mellitus. Ethnic difference in criteria of obesity in Asian metabolic syndrome exists, and mutual comparisons in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome have a difficulty to conduct.
Copyright © 2010 Diabetes India. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 22814837     DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2010.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr        ISSN: 1871-4021


  6 in total

1.  Predictive Utility of Body Mass Index for Metabolic Syndrome Among Patients with Schizophrenia in Japan.

Authors:  Norio Sugawara; Norio Yasui-Furukori; Manabu Yamazaki; Kazutaka Shimoda; Takao Mori; Takuro Sugai; Hiroshi Matsuda; Yutaro Suzuki; Yuji Ozeki; Kurefu Okamoto; Toyoaki Sagae; Toshiyuki Someya
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.570

2.  Waist circumference cutoff and its importance for diagnosis of metabolic syndrome in Asian Indians: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Daliparthy Devi Pratyush; Shalbha Tiwari; Saurabh Singh; Surya Kumar Singh
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-01

3.  Cross-sectional study of patients with type 2 diabetes in OR Tambo district, South Africa.

Authors:  Oladele Vincent Adeniyi; Parimalaranie Yogeswaran; Benjamin Longo-Mbenza; Daniel Ter Goon; Anthony Idowu Ajayi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Current status of health among workers in Japan: Results from the Japan Epidemiology Collaboration on Occupational Health Study.

Authors:  Keisuke Kuwahara; Akihiko Uehara; Makoto Yamamoto; Tohru Nakagawa; Toru Honda; Shuichiro Yamamoto; Hiroko Okazaki; Naoko Sasaki; Takayuki Ogasawara; Ai Hori; Chihiro Nishiura; Toshiaki Miyamoto; Takeshi Kochi; Masafumi Eguchi; Kentaro Tomita; Teppei Imai; Akiko Nishihara; Satsue Nagahama; Taizo Murakami; Makiko Shimizu; Isamu Kabe; Tetsuya Mizoue; Naoki Kunugita; Tomofumi Sone; Seitaro Dohi
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.179

5.  Use of CHAID decision trees to formulate pathways for the early detection of metabolic syndrome in young adults.

Authors:  Brian Miller; Mark Fridline; Pei-Yang Liu; Deborah Marino
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 2.238

6.  Predictors of metabolic syndrome in community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Jeanine M Van Ancum; Nini H Jonkman; Natasja M van Schoor; Emily Tressel; Carel G M Meskers; Mirjam Pijnappels; Andrea B Maier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.