Literature DB >> 22814819

Limitations of in vitro assessments of the drug interaction potential of botanical supplements.

John S Markowitz1, Hao-Jie Zhu.   

Abstract

Although there are inherent and recognized limitations of in vitro screening methodologies to assess conventional drug-drug interactions (DDIs) per industry guidelines and those adopted by independent laboratories, further limitations are being appreciated which are unique to the evaluation of botanical products and potential DDIs in which they may participate. Among the larger issues faced are the uncertainty in assigning hepatic concentrations of multiple constituents and their potential metabolites, accounting for oral bioavailability, distribution, first-pass metabolism and active metabolites. Furthermore, the wide variability in the chemical composition of commercially available botanical supplement formulations continues to be a major concern, and manufacturing standards or enforcement thereof is essentially nonexistent in most countries. Differing formulations, unspecified product excipients, administration and absorption of the therapeutic ingredient(s) of a standardized dosage form, the very presence and/or concentration of one or more phytoconstituents within a supplement are typically unknown and nontarget entities. A further issue is the absence of authentic analytical standards, and the inability to accurately screen the entities as mixtures to even approximate typical scenarios, which may occur following the ingestion of dietary supplements, adds additional layers of complexity to experimental design and difficulty in interpreting experimental results. Multiple challenges exist in experimental methodologies employed in performing in vitro research with conventional pharmaceuticals and those unique to botanical extracts. These obstacles prevent the investigators from effectively utilizing high-throughput models to accomplish more than essentially "flag" suspected sources of drug interactions which must be further evaluated in vivo, at present, in order to confirm clinical significance. This review is intended to discuss the problems and challenges in evaluating botanical-drug interactions using in vitro methodologies. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22814819     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1315025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Planta Med        ISSN: 0032-0943            Impact factor:   3.352


  9 in total

1.  An ex vivo approach to botanical-drug interactions: a proof of concept study.

Authors:  Xinwen Wang; Hao-Jie Zhu; Juliana Munoz; Bill J Gurley; John S Markowitz
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 4.360

2.  An assessment of pharmacokinetics and antioxidant activity of free silymarin flavonolignans in healthy volunteers: a dose escalation study.

Authors:  Hao-Jie Zhu; Bryan J Brinda; Kenneth D Chavin; Hilary J Bernstein; Kennerly S Patrick; John S Markowitz
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.579

3.  In vitro inhibition of carboxylesterase 1 by Kava (Piper methysticum) Kavalactones.

Authors:  Philip W Melchert; Yuli Qian; Qingchen Zhang; Brandon O Klee; Chengguo Xing; John S Markowitz
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 5.168

4.  Evaluation of the effects of four types of tea on the activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes with a probe cocktail and HPLC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Xueyan Wang; Yanping Liu; Liming Ye; Ying Wei; Yingqiang Fu; Yu Chen; Linchuan Liao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-05

5.  Multiple Mechanistic Action of Brevinin-1FL Peptide against Oxidative Stress Effects in an Acute Inflammatory Model of Carrageenan-Induced Damage.

Authors:  Jinwei Chai; Junfang Liu; Maolin Tian; Hang Liao; Jiena Wu; Jianpeng Xie; Shian Lai; Guoxiang Mo; Xin Chen; Xueqing Xu
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 7.310

6.  Sambucus nigra extracts inhibit infectious bronchitis virus at an early point during replication.

Authors:  Christie Chen; David M Zuckerman; Susanna Brantley; Michka Sharpe; Kevin Childress; Egbert Hoiczyk; Amanda R Pendleton
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 7.  Valerian: no evidence for clinically relevant interactions.

Authors:  Olaf Kelber; Karen Nieber; Karin Kraft
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 8.  Herb-Drug Interaction in Inflammatory Diseases: Review of Phytomedicine and Herbal Supplements.

Authors:  Annemarie Lippert; Bertold Renner
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  A regulatory science viewpoint on botanical-drug interactions.

Authors:  Manuela Grimstein; Shiew-Mei Huang
Journal:  J Food Drug Anal       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 6.157

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.