Literature DB >> 22814804

Are rehabilitation services for patients in UK eye clinics adequate? A survey of eye care professionals.

H Gillespie-Gallery1, M L Conway, A Subramanian.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine whether specific services such as emotional and family support are currently available in the United Kingdom for people with visual impairment.
METHODS: A validated online survey was created and distributed to clinical staff in eye clinics (for example, ophthalmologists and optometrists) and rehabilitation staff (for example, social and rehabilitation workers) in the community, who worked with people with visual impairment. A total of 67 clinical and 42 rehabilitation staff completed the entire survey online.
RESULTS: Only 67% of the respondents claimed their clinics provide emotional support and 44% of respondent's clinics provided family support. Clinical and rehabilitation staff have differences in opinion over what constitutes an essential service for a visually impaired patient. Rehabilitation staff considered emotional support and referral to social services as essential more often than clinical staff (P<0.05). There is some confusion over the type of personnel who provides each type of service, with some services showing substantial repetition.
CONCLUSION: In the clinics sampled, there appears to be an underprovision of emotional support (attentive listening plus constructive suggestions) and family support (emotional support and advice for family members) for visually impaired patients in the United Kingdom. There also seems to be some discrepancy in services that eye care professionals feel are available and previous reports by visually impaired patients of the service they receive. There is a need to develop standardised pathways across the United Kingdom, to solve some of these issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22814804      PMCID: PMC3470053          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2012.141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  8 in total

Review 1.  How effective is low vision service provision? A systematic review.

Authors:  Alison M Binns; Catey Bunce; Chris Dickinson; Robert Harper; Rhiannon Tudor-Edwards; Margaret Woodhouse; Pat Linck; Alan Suttie; Jonathan Jackson; Jennifer Lindsay; James Wolffsohn; Lindsey Hughes; Tom H Margrain
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  A profile of low vision services in England: the Low Vision Service Model Evaluation (LOVSME) project.

Authors:  C Dickinson; P Linck; R Tudor-Edwards; A Binns; C Bunce; R Harper; J Jackson; J Lindsay; A Suttie; J Wolffsohn; M Woodhouse; T Margrain
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Impact of unilateral and bilateral vision loss on quality of life.

Authors:  H T V Vu; J E Keeffe; C A McCarty; H R Taylor
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  The recognition and treatment of depression in older people in primary care.

Authors:  M J Crawford; M Prince; P Menezes; A H Mann
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.485

5.  Individual's recollections of their experiences in eye clinics and understanding of their eye condition: results from a survey of visually impaired people in Britain.

Authors:  Graeme Douglas; Sue Pavey; Christine Corcoran; Frank Eperjesi
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Visual disability variables. II: The difficulty of tasks for a sample of low-vision patients.

Authors:  Robert W Massof; Cynthia T Hsu; Frank H Baker; G David Barnett; William L Park; James T Deremeik; Carol Rainey; Cathy Epstein
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Low vision services for vision rehabilitation in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  L E Culham; B Ryan; A J Jackson; A R Hill; B Jones; C Miles; J A Young; C Bunce; A C Bird
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Self-management programs for adults with low vision: needs and challenges.

Authors:  G Rees; C L Saw; E L Lamoureux; J E Keeffe
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-08-07
  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Micro-costing the provision of emotional support and information in UK eye clinics.

Authors:  Hanna Gillespie-Gallery; Ahalya Subramanian; Miriam L Conway
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.655

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.