Literature DB >> 22814627

The anaerobic threshold: over-valued or under-utilized? A novel concept to enhance lipid optimization!

Declan A J Connolly1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this article is to assess the value of the anaerobic threshold for use in clinical populations with the intent to improve exercise adaptations and outcomes. The anaerobic threshold is generally poorly understood, improperly used, and poorly measured. It is rarely used in clinical settings and often reserved for athletic performance testing. RECENT
FINDINGS: Increased exercise participation within both clinical and other less healthy populations has increased our attention to optimizing exercise outcomes. Of particular interest is the optimization of lipid metabolism during exercise in order to improve numerous conditions such as blood lipid profile, insulin sensitivity and secretion, and weight loss. Numerous authors report on the benefits of appropriate exercise intensity in optimizing outcomes even though regulation of intensity has proved difficult for many. Despite limited use, selected exercise physiology markers have considerable merit in exercise-intensity regulation. The anaerobic threshold, and other markers such as heart rate, may well provide a simple and valuable mechanism for regulating exercising intensity.
SUMMARY: The use of the anaerobic threshold and accurate target heart rate to regulate exercise intensity is a valuable approach that is under-utilized across populations. The measurement of the anaerobic threshold can be simplified to allow clients to use nonlaboratory measures, for example heart rate, in order to self-regulate exercise intensity and improve outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22814627     DOI: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328356e068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care        ISSN: 1363-1950            Impact factor:   4.294


  5 in total

1.  Determination of ideal target exercise heart rate for cardiac patients suitable for rehabilitation.

Authors:  Shih Jia Janice Tan; John Carson Allen; Swee Yaw Tan
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome.

Authors:  Leandro Barbagelata; Walter Masson; Diego Iglesias; Ezequiel Lillo; Juan Francisco Migone; Maria Laura Orazi; Joaquin Maritano Furcada
Journal:  Med Clin (Engl Ed)       Date:  2022-07-05

3.  Myokine/Adipokine Response to "Aerobic" Exercise: Is It Just a Matter of Exercise Load?

Authors:  Zihong He; Ye Tian; Pedro L Valenzuela; Chuanye Huang; Jiexiu Zhao; Ping Hong; Zilin He; Shuhui Yin; Alejandro Lucia
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  The Effect of Eight-Week Sprint Interval Training on Aerobic Performance of Elite Badminton Players.

Authors:  Haochong Liu; Bo Leng; Qian Li; Ye Liu; Dapeng Bao; Yixiong Cui
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Playing around the anaerobic threshold during COVID-19 pandemic: advantages and disadvantages of adding bouts of anaerobic work to aerobic activity in physical treatment of individuals with obesity.

Authors:  Alberto Salvadori; Paolo Fanari; Paolo Marzullo; Franco Codecasa; Ilaria Tovaglieri; Mauro Cornacchia; Ileana Terruzzi; Anna Ferrulli; Patrizia Palmulli; Amelia Brunani; Stefano Lanzi; Livio Luzi
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.280

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.