Literature DB >> 22814053

Quantitative measurement of wound architecture in microincision cataract surgery.

Mitchell P Weikert1, Li Wang, James Barrish, Ramon Dimalanta, Douglas D Koch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether changes in internal wound architecture after phacoemulsification can be measured quantitatively by analysis of scanning electron micrographs.
SETTING: Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
DESIGN: Experimental study.
METHODS: Two comparative studies in human cadaver eyes were performed using coaxial small-incision cataract surgery (SICS), bimanual microincision cataract surgery (MICS), coaxial MICS, and a variety of phacoemulsification tips (MicroSurgical Technologies, Microphaco Tapered, Microtip Turbosonics, and Microphaco Mackool). After surgery, the cornea and scleral rims were harvested and digital scanning electron micrographs were taken. The internal corneal wound was analyzed using measurement software to determine the area of endothelial cell loss and length of Descemet membrane tears.
RESULTS: Quantifiable differences were observed between combinations of techniques and tip designs. The mean area of endothelial cell loss was 2.93 ± 0.31 mm(2) (SD) after coaxial MICS (n = 4) and 2.85 ± 0.54 mm(2) after bimanual MICS (n = 4). However, after normalizing for differences in tip or sleeve diameter, the area of endothelial cell loss ranged from 1.4-fold to 1.7-fold less with coaxial SICS than with bimanual MICS with Microphaco Tapered, Microtip Turbosonics, and Microphaco Mackool tips. The mean total length of tearing was 1.38 ± 0.38 mm for bimanual MICS (n = 4) and 0.84 ± 0.61 mm for coaxial MICS (n = 4).
CONCLUSION: The length and area of corneal wounds could be quantitated with accuracy and the measurements could be used to make quantifiable comparisons of phacoemulsification techniques and tips. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr. Dimalanta is an employee of Alcon Research, Ltd. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22814053     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  3 in total

1.  Pivot concept: achieving a good-quality capsulorrhexis through a 2.2 mm or less clear corneal incision by using standard capsulorhexis forceps.

Authors:  Hung-Yuan Lin; Ya-Jung Chuang; Xin Tang; Chun-Chang Lin; Hsin-Yang Chen; Pi-Jung Lin
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Architecture evaluation of the main clear corneal incisions in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery by optical coherence tomography imaging.

Authors:  Mario Augusto Pereira Dias Chaves; André Lins de Medeiros; César Martins Cortez Vilar; Klayne Rafaella Pereira Magalhães; Michelle Rodrigues Gonçalves; Patrick Frenzel de Moraes Tzelikis; Wilson Takashi Hida; Pedro Carlos Carricondo; Milton Ruiz Alves
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-14

3.  Coaxial Microincision Cataract Surgery versus Standard Coaxial Small-Incision Cataract Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Xingchao Shentu; Xin Zhang; Xiajing Tang; Xiaoning Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.