Literature DB >> 22813886

Patient cost associated with filling a prescription for extended-duration venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following surgery for gynecologic cancer.

Katherine Cain1, Kathleen M Schmeler, Ginger Langley, Oliver Max, Pedro T Ramirez, Charles F Levenback.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this study was to determine the average patient cost for filling a prescription for extended-duration enoxaparin prophylaxis.
METHODS: Women who underwent major abdominal/pelvic surgery for histologically confirmed gynecologic malignancy were included. Patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery, had benign disease or were on treatment for existing VTE were excluded. Pharmacy resource specialists electronically submitted test prescriptions to verify enoxaparin coverage in the outpatient setting prior to hospital discharge. Patient co-pay information collected included: the number of patients requiring prescription insurance prior authorization, those qualifying for the Lovenox Patient Assistance Program® (PAP) and insurance status.
RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-four patients were discharged with extended-duration enoxaparin prophylaxis for 28 days between October 2009 and May 2011. The average patient cost to complete 28 days of enoxaparin prophylaxis was $62 (median $21, range $0-1210). Prior authorization was required for 32 patients (10%). Two patients (0.6%) qualified for the Lovenox Patient Assistance Program®. A decrease in the average patient cost from $71 to $52 (median $30 to $10) was observed after generic enoxaparin approval in July 2011.
CONCLUSION: Our results show that at least 90% of patients filled their prescription of extended-duration enoxaparin prophylaxis after major abdominal surgery for cancer regardless of cost.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22813886     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.07.096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  5 in total

Review 1.  Venous thromboembolic events in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Pedro T Ramirez; Alpa M Nick; Michael Frumovitz; Kathleen M Schmeler
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 4.137

2.  Effectiveness and safety of expanded perioperative thromboprophylaxis in complex gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Bradley R Corr; Andrea M Winter; Mary D Sammel; Christina S Chu; Brian F Gage; Andrea R Hagemann
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  The limited utility of currently available venous thromboembolism risk assessment tools in gynecological oncology patients.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates following the implementation of extended duration prophylaxis for patients undergoing surgery for gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Kathleen M Schmeler; Ginger L Wilson; Katherine Cain; Mark F Munsell; Pedro T Ramirez; Pamela T Soliman; Alpa M Nick; Michael Frumovitz; Robert L Coleman; Michael H Kroll; Charles F Levenback
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Bladder Cancer Recovery Pathways: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ian Maloney; Daniel C Parker; Michael S Cookson; Sanjay Patel
Journal:  Bladder Cancer       Date:  2017-10-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.