Literature DB >> 22812542

Does head CT scan pathology predict outcome after mild traumatic brain injury?

M Lannsjö1, M Backheden, U Johansson, J L Af Geijerstam, J Borg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: More evidence is needed to forward our understanding of the key determinants of poor outcome after mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI). A large, prospective, national cohort of patients was studied to analyse the effect of head CT scan pathology on the outcome.
METHODS: One-thousand two-hundred and sixty-two patients with MTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score 15) at 39 emergency departments completed a study protocol including acute head CT scan examination and follow-up by the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire and the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) at 3 months after MTBI. Binary logistic regression was used for the assessment of prediction ability.
RESULTS: In 751 men (60%) and 511 women (40%), with a mean age of 30 years (median 21, range 6-94), we observed relevant or suspect relevant pathologic findings on acute CT scan in 52 patients (4%). Patients aged below 30 years reported better outcome both with respect to symptoms and GOSE as compared to patients in older age groups. Men reported better outcome than women as regards symptoms (OR 0.64, CI 0.49-0.85 for ≥3 symptoms) and global function (OR 0.60, CI 0.39-0.92 for GOSE 1-6).
CONCLUSIONS: Pathology on acute CT scan examination had no effect on self-reported symptoms or global function at 3 months after MTBI. Female gender and older age predicted a less favourable outcome. The findings support the view that other factors than brain injury deserve attention to minimize long-term complaints after MTBI.
© 2012 The Author(s) European Journal of Neurology © 2012 EFNS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22812542     DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03813.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurol        ISSN: 1351-5101            Impact factor:   6.089


  15 in total

1.  Integration of New Technology for Research in the Emergency Department: Feasibility of Deploying a Robotic Assessment Tool for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Evaluation.

Authors:  Vignesh Subbian; Jonathan J Ratcliff; Jason M Meunier; Joseph J Korfhagen; Fred R Beyette; George J Shaw
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.316

2.  Gender differences in neurological emergencies part II: a consensus summary and research agenda on traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  David W Wright; Tamara R Espinoza; Lisa H Merck; Jonathan J Ratcliff; Anika Backster; Donald G Stein
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Sex Differences in Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Should Know.

Authors:  Raeesa Gupte; William Brooks; Rachel Vukas; Janet Pierce; Janna Harris
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  A Novel Tool for Evaluation of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Patients in the Emergency Department: Does Robotic Assessment of Neuromotor Performance Following Injury Predict the Presence of Postconcussion Symptoms at Follow-up?

Authors:  Vignesh Subbian; Jonathan J Ratcliff; Joseph J Korfhagen; Kimberly W Hart; Jason M Meunier; George J Shaw; Christopher J Lindsell; Fred R Beyette
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  Traumatic brain injury: CT scan does not predict outcome of mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Katherine Smith
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 42.937

6.  Acute Clinical Predictors of Symptom Recovery in Emergency Department Patients with Uncomplicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury or Non-Traumatic Brain Injuries.

Authors:  Lindsay D Nelson; Robyn E Furger; Jana Ranson; Sergey Tarima; Thomas A Hammeke; Christopher Randolph; William B Barr; Kevin Guskiewicz; Christopher M Olsen; E Brooke Lerner; Michael A McCrea
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Predicting outcome following mild traumatic brain injury: protocol for the longitudinal, prospective, observational Concussion Recovery (CREST) cohort study.

Authors:  Aleksandra Karolina Gozt; Sarah Claire Hellewell; Jacinta Thorne; Elizabeth Thomas; Francesca Buhagiar; Shaun Markovic; Anoek Van Houselt; Alexander Ring; Glenn Arendts; Ben Smedley; Sjinene Van Schalkwyk; Philip Brooks; John Iliff; Antonio Celenza; Ashes Mukherjee; Dan Xu; Suzanne Robinson; Stephen Honeybul; Gill Cowen; Melissa Licari; Michael Bynevelt; Carmela F Pestell; Daniel Fatovich; Melinda Fitzgerald
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Concussion is confusing us all.

Authors:  David J Sharp; Peter O Jenkins
Journal:  Pract Neurol       Date:  2015-06

9.  The Frequency of Brain CT-Scan Findings in Patients with Scalp Lacerations Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury; A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Hadid Hamrah; Sara Mehrvarz; Amir Mohammad Mirghassemi
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2018-01

10.  Neuropsychological outcome and diffusion tensor imaging in complicated versus uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  William J Panenka; Rael T Lange; Sylvain Bouix; Jason R Shewchuk; Manraj K S Heran; Jeffrey R Brubacher; Ryan Eckbo; Martha E Shenton; Grant L Iverson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.