Literature DB >> 22811801

Single-fraction image-guided extracranial radiosurgery for recurrent and metastatic abdominal and pelvic cancers: short-term local control, metabolic response, and toxicity.

Charles L Perkins1, Bassel El-Reyes, Edmund Simon, David Kooby, William Torres, John S Kauh, Charles A Staley, Jerome C Landry.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Extracranial radiosurgery (ECRS) is a novel treatment for inoperable recurrent or metastatic abdominopelvic cancers. However, local control, metabolic response, and acute toxicity remain undefined. We therefore analyzed these endpoints in patients treated with single-fraction image-guided ECRS at Emory University.
METHODS: 20 patients with recurrent or metastatic inoperable abdominal or pelvic cancers (23 sites) were treated with single-fraction ECRS using a Varian linear accelerator between 08/2006 and 02/2008. Patients with pancreas, biliary and liver cancer were part of an IRB-approved ongoing dose-escalation trial. 14 patients had received prior abdominal or pelvic external beam radiation. In 13 patients pre-treatment PET/CT was used to delineate the target volume. Image-guidance was provided by implanted fiducial markers and on-board imaging in 13 patients, and with cone-beam CT in 1 patient. 8 Patients were treated with respiratory gating. The median single-fraction dose delivered was 18 Gy. Each patient was assessed at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after radiosurgery for toxicity, and at approximately 1 month and 3 months with PET/CT for metabolic tumor response. Partial response was defined as a reduction in size of > 10% on CT and a decrease in maximum SUV of > 15% on PET. Complete response was defined as complete resolution on CT, and a reduction of SUV to background levels on PET.
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 6.3 months (range 1.5-12.2 months). The overall response rate (the sum of complete responses and partial responses) by treated site was noted in 36% (1 month), 47% (3 months) and 48% (final). A complete response was achieved in 13% (3 sites). At last follow-up, local control (sum of response rate and stable disease) was 74%. The metabolic response rate by pet only(sum of partial and complete responders) was 85% on final analysis. 23% of pet avid sites achieved a complete response. Two pet avid treated sites (13%) did show evidence of progression at 3 months, but subsequent CT/FDG-PET scans showed a decrease in maximum SUV; no patients suffered progressive disease based on metabolic imaging at last follow-up. Grade 1-2 upper GI acute toxicity (nausea, vomiting, gastritis, and pain) was noted in 47% and 55% of patients at 1 week and 1 month, respectively. Correspondingly, acute lower GI toxicity (diarrhea, pain) was lower at 12% and 6%. Overall grade 1-2 GI toxicity was seen in 59% of patients at 1 week (pain and nausea being the most common) and 61% of patients at 1 month post stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) (nausea being the most common).
CONCLUSIONS: Single-fraction image-guided ECRS for recurrent or metastatic abdominopelvic cancers is safe and effective in the short term. 3-month local control was very good , and was predicted by an early metabolic response as seen on PET/CT. Acute side effects were mild, with no patient experiencing grade 3 or greater toxicity. Dose escalation and long-term studies are warranted for this treatment approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Single fraction sbrt; metabolic response toxicity; pancreatic liver abdominal cancers; stereotactic body radiotherapy

Year:  2010        PMID: 22811801      PMCID: PMC3397571          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2010.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  27 in total

1.  Postoperative radiosurgery for malignant spinal tumors.

Authors:  Jack P Rock; Samuel Ryu; Mohammad S Shukairy; Fang-Fang Yin; Aktham Sharif; Faye Schreiber; Muwaffak Abdulhak; Jae Ho Kim; Mark L Rosenblum
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  A report of the consensus workshop panel on the treatment of brain metastases.

Authors:  L R Coia; N Aaronson; R Linggood; J Loeffler; T J Priestman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Flare response in 18F-fluoride ion PET bone scanning.

Authors:  Andrew A Wade; James A Scott; Irene Kuter; Alan J Fischman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Defining co-related parameters between 'metabolic' flare and 'clinical', 'biochemical', and 'osteoblastic' flare and establishing guidelines for assessing response to treatment in cancer.

Authors:  Sandip Basu; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Long-term results of lung metastasectomy: prognostic analyses based on 5206 cases.

Authors:  U Pastorino; M Buyse; G Friedel; R J Ginsberg; P Girard; P Goldstraw; M Johnston; P McCormack; H Pass; J B Putnam
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Liver resection for colorectal metastases.

Authors:  Y Fong; A M Cohen; J G Fortner; W E Enker; A D Turnbull; D G Coit; A M Marrero; M Prasad; L H Blumgart; M F Brennan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  A phase I trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver metastases.

Authors:  Tracey E Schefter; Brian D Kavanagh; Robert D Timmerman; Higinia R Cardenes; Anna Baron; Laurie E Gaspar
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Stereotactic hypofractionated high-dose irradiation for stage I nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: clinical outcomes in 245 subjects in a Japanese multiinstitutional study.

Authors:  Hiroshi Onishi; Tsutomu Araki; Hiroki Shirato; Yasushi Nagata; Masahiro Hiraoka; Kotaro Gomi; Takashi Yamashita; Yuzuru Niibe; Katsuyuki Karasawa; Kazushige Hayakawa; Yoshihiro Takai; Tomoki Kimura; Yutaka Hirokawa; Atsuya Takeda; Atsushi Ouchi; Masato Hareyama; Masaki Kokubo; Ryusuke Hara; Jun Itami; Kazunari Yamada
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  A multi-institutional experience with stereotactic radiosurgery for solitary brain metastasis.

Authors:  J C Flickinger; D Kondziolka; L D Lunsford; R J Coffey; M L Goodman; E G Shaw; W R Hudgins; R Weiner; G R Harsh; P K Sneed
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1994-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  4 in total

1.  Giving oligometastases the best shot using stereotactic body radiosurgery with image guidance. How far is the cat out of the bag?

Authors:  Johnny Yap
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2010-09

2.  Pancreatobiliary and peripancreatobiliary tuberculosis: a rare cause of obstructive jaundice.

Authors:  Zhenbin Shen; Houbao Liu
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.318

3.  Adequacy of inhale/exhale breathhold CT based ITV margins and image-guided registration for free-breathing pancreas and liver SBRT.

Authors:  Wensha Yang; Benedick A Fraass; Robert Reznik; Nicholas Nissen; Simon Lo; Laith H Jamil; Kapil Gupta; Howard Sandler; Richard Tuli
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 4.  Single-Fraction Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A Paradigm During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic and Beyond?

Authors:  Sylvia S W Ng; Matthew S Ning; Percy Lee; Ryan A McMahon; Shankar Siva; Michael D Chuong
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-06-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.