| Literature DB >> 22811791 |
Prateek Bhatia1, Jogeshwar Binota, Neelam Varma, Rk Marwaha, Pankaj Malhotra, Subhash Varma.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The incidence of common fusion transcripts in AML is 40-45%, but data from Indian sub-continent is limited. AIMS #ENTITYSTARTX00026;Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22811791 PMCID: PMC3395706 DOI: 10.4084/MJHID.2012.042
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis ISSN: 2035-3006 Impact factor: 2.576
Primer sequences used in both the multiplex RT-PCR assay’s and the product sizes of the common transcripts.
| Transcript genes | Primer Sequences | Product size (bp) |
|---|---|---|
| AML | CTACCGCAGCCATGAAGAACC | 395 |
| PML | CAGTGTACGCCTTCTCCATCA | 381 |
| CBFβ | GCAGGCAAGGTATATTTGAAGG | 418 |
| PML-A1 | CAGTGTACGCCTTCTCCATCA | bcr1(A1-B)-381 |
| PML-A2 | CTGCTGGAGGCTGTGGAC | |
| RARA-B | GCTTGTAGATGCGGGGTAGA | |
| PML-C1 | TCAAGATGGAGTCTGAGGAGG | bcr1 (C2-D)-688 |
Positivity of adult and pediatric cases for different fusion transcripts
| Age group | Positive cases | AML1-ETO | PML-RARA | CBFB-MYH11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adult | 28/96 (29.16%) | 14/96 (14.58%) | 12/96 (12.5%) | 2/96 (2.08%) |
| Pediatric | 11/20 (55%) | 6/20 (30%) | 3/20 (15%) | 2/20 (10%) |
Figure 1Multiplex RT-PCR gel highlighting positivity for different fusion transcripts in AML cases. Lane 3: Negative control. Lane 5: Positive for Inv16 (418bp). Lane 6: Positive for PML-RARA (381bp). Lane 7: Positive for AML1-ETO (395bp). Lane 8: Positive Control AML1-ETO (395bp)
Figure 2Multiplex RT-PCR gel for PML-RARA showing bcr1 isoform positivity. Lane 2: Positive control bcr1 (A1-B primer set)-381bp. Lane 3: A case of AML-M3 positive for bcr1 isoform. Lane 6: Positive control bcr3 (A2-B primer set)- 376bp. Lane 10: Positive control bcr1 (C1-D primer set)- 214bp. Lane 11: Same case of AML-M3 positive for bcr1 isoform. Lane 14: Positive control bcr3 (C2-D primer set)- 289bp. Lane 1, 5, 9, 13: Negative controls with each primer set.
Shows the incidence of common transcripts in AML in various studies
| Study | Number of AML cases | Incidence of Fusion Transcripts |
|---|---|---|
| 1) | ||
| 2) Olesen et al | 233 | 54 (23%) |
| 3) Strehl et al | 67 | 24 (44%) |
| 4) Pakakasama et al | 20 | 5 (25%) |
| 5) Pallisgard et al | 102 | 45 (44%) |
| 6) Hyun-Jung Choi et al | 213 | 83(39%) |
Highlights positivity of various fusion transcripts in adult and pediatric studies
| Study | Adult | Pediatric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AML-ETO | PML-RARA | CBFβ-MYH11 | AML-ETO | PML-RARA | CBFβ-MYH11 | |
| 1. Present study | 14.58% | 12.5% | 2.08% | 30.0% | 15.0% | 10.0% |
| 2. Pakakasama et al | - | - | - | 20% | 5% | - |
| 3. Olesen et al | 4.6% | 4.2% | 6.6% | 22.2% | 22.2% | 5.5% |
| 4. Hyung-Jung Choi et al | 12.6% | 16.3% | 1.6% | 30.4% | 17.4% | - |