Literature DB >> 22811556

Palliative sedation: not just normal medical practice. Ethical reflections on the Royal Dutch Medical Association's guideline on palliative sedation.

Rien Janssens1, Johannes J M van Delden, Guy A M Widdershoven.   

Abstract

The main premise of the Royal Dutch Medical Association's (RDMA) guideline on palliative sedation is that palliative sedation, contrary to euthanasia, is normal medical practice. Although we do not deny the ethical distinctions between euthanasia and palliative sedation, we will critically analyse the guideline's argumentation strategy with which euthanasia is demarcated from palliative sedation. First, we will analyse the guideline's main premise, which entails that palliative sedation is normal medical treatment. After this, we will critically discuss three crucial propositions of the guideline that are used to support this premise: (1) the patient's life expectancy should not exceed 2 weeks; (2) the aim of the physician should be to relieve suffering and (3) expert consultation is optional. We will conclude that, if inherent problematic aspects of palliative sedation are taken seriously, palliative sedation is less normal than it is now depicted in the guideline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22811556     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  10 in total

1.  Consultation with specialist palliative care services in palliative sedation: considerations of Dutch physicians.

Authors:  Ian Koper; Agnes van der Heide; Rien Janssens; Siebe Swart; Roberto Perez; Judith Rietjens
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Making sense of continuous sedation in end-of-life care for cancer patients: an interview study with bereaved relatives in three European countries.

Authors:  S M Bruinsma; J Brown; A van der Heide; L Deliens; L Anquinet; S A Payne; J E Seymour; J A C Rietjens
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Mandatory consultation for palliative sedation? Reflections on Koper et al.

Authors:  L Robijn; K Raus; L Deliens; S Sterckx; K Chambaere
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Controversies surrounding continuous deep sedation at the end of life: the parliamentary and societal debates in France.

Authors:  Kasper Raus; Kenneth Chambaere; Sigrid Sterckx
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Reflections on palliative sedation.

Authors:  Robert Twycross
Journal:  Palliat Care       Date:  2019-01-27

6.  Defining "Continuous Deep Sedation" Using Treatment Protocol: A Proposal Article.

Authors:  Tatsuya Morita; Kengo Imai; Masanori Mori; Naosuke Yokomichi; Satoru Tsuneto
Journal:  Palliat Med Rep       Date:  2022-02-08

7.  Palliative sedation and medical assistance in dying: Distinctly different or simply semantics?

Authors:  Reanne Booker; Anne Bruce
Journal:  Nurs Inq       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Continuous sedation until death: the everyday moral reasoning of physicians, nurses and family caregivers in the UK, The Netherlands and Belgium.

Authors:  Kasper Raus; Jayne Brown; Clive Seale; Judith A C Rietjens; Rien Janssens; Sophie Bruinsma; Freddy Mortier; Sheila Payne; Sigrid Sterckx
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 9.  Palliative care and quality of life in neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Naveen Mummudi; Rakesh Jalali
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2014-08-01

10.  Trends in Continuous Deep Sedation until Death between 2007 and 2013: A Repeated Nationwide Survey.

Authors:  Lenzo Robijn; Joachim Cohen; Judith Rietjens; Luc Deliens; Kenneth Chambaere
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.