Literature DB >> 22810759

Readability analysis of internet-based patient information regarding skull base tumors.

Poonam Misra1, Khushabu Kasabwala, Nitin Agarwal, Jean Anderson Eloy, James K Liu.   

Abstract

Readability is an important consideration in assessing healthcare-related literature. In order for a source of information to be the most beneficial to patients, it should be written at a level appropriate for the audience. The National Institute of Health recommends that health literature be written at a maximum level of sixth grade. This is not uniformly found in current health literature, putting patients with lower reading levels at a disadvantage. In February 2012, healthcare-oriented education resources were retrieved from websites obtained using the Google search phrase skull base tumors. Of the first 25 consecutive, unique website hits, 18 websites were found to contain information for patients. Ten different assessment scales were utilized to assess the readability of the patient-specific web pages. Patient-oriented material found online for skull base tumors was written at a significantly higher level than the reading level of the average US patient. The average reading level of this material was found to be at a minimum of eleventh grade across all ten scales. Health related material related to skull base tumors available through the internet can be improved to reach a larger audience without sacrificing the necessary information. Revisions of this material can provide significant benefit for average patients and improve their health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22810759     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-012-0930-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  25 in total

1.  The readability of pediatric patient education materials on the World Wide Web.

Authors:  D M D'Alessandro; P Kingsley; J Johnson-West
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2001-07

2.  A new readability yardstick.

Authors:  R FLESCH
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1948-06

3.  The impact of medical terminology on readability of patient education materials.

Authors:  Kari Sand-Jecklin
Journal:  J Community Health Nurs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.974

Review 4.  Readability of patient education materials: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  J Albright; C de Guzman; P Acebo; D Paiva; M Faulkner; J Swanson
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.257

5.  Readability assessment of Internet-based patient education materials related to endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Deepa V Cherla; Saurin Sanghvi; Osamah J Choudhry; James K Liu; Jean Anderson Eloy
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.

Authors:  Tiffany M Walsh; Teresa A Volsko
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.258

Review 7.  Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction and compliance.

Authors:  D L Roter
Journal:  Health Educ Monogr       Date:  1977

8.  Shame and health literacy: the unspoken connection.

Authors:  N S Parikh; R M Parker; J R Nurss; D W Baker; M V Williams
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1996-01

9.  Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to facial fractures.

Authors:  Saurin Sanghvi; Deepa V Cherla; Pratik A Shukla; Jean Anderson Eloy
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Patient reading ability: an overlooked problem in health care.

Authors:  R H Jackson; T C Davis; L E Bairnsfather; R B George; M A Crouch; H Gault
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 0.954

View more
  10 in total

1.  Are we effectively informing patients? A quantitative analysis of on-line patient education resources from the American Society of Neuroradiology.

Authors:  D R Hansberry; N Agarwal; S F Gonzales; S R Baker
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  [Systematic analysis of the readability of patient information on websites of German nonuniversity ENT hospitals].

Authors:  M F Meyer; R Bacher; K S Roth; D Beutner; J C Luers
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Fertility patients' use and perceptions of online fertility educational material.

Authors:  Claire Ann Jones; Chaula Mehta; Rhonda Zwingerman; Kimberly E Liu
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2020-07-18

4.  Quality and readability of online patient information regarding sclerotherapy for venous malformations.

Authors:  Jonathan H Pass; Amani H Patel; Sam Stuart; Alex M Barnacle; Premal A Patel
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-02-02

5.  Readability of Online Patient Educational Resources Found on NCI-Designated Cancer Center Web Sites.

Authors:  Stephen A Rosenberg; David Francis; Craig R Hullett; Zachary S Morris; Michael M Fisher; Jeffrey V Brower; Kristin A Bradley; Bethany M Anderson; Michael F Bassetti; Randall J Kimple
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 11.908

6.  [Readability of medical texts on websites of German ENT university hospitals].

Authors:  J-C Luers; A-O Gostian; K S Roth; D Beutner
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 7.  The impact of health literacy in the care of surgical patients: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Gildasio S De Oliveira; Robert J McCarthy; Michael S Wolf; Jane Holl
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Patient information in Graves' disease and thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy: readability assessment of online resources.

Authors:  Matthew R Edmunds; Alastair K Denniston; Kristien Boelaert; Jayne A Franklyn; Omar M Durrani
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 6.568

9.  Accuracy of Online Pictorial Resources for Common Hand Surgery Procedures.

Authors:  Kitae E Park; Omar Allam; Samuel Kim; Adnan Prsic
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2020-07-25

10.  Evaluation of quality and readability of online patient information on osteoporosis and osteoporosis drug treatment and recommendations for improvement.

Authors:  F Crawford-Manning; C Greenall; A Hawarden; L Bullock; S Leyland; C Jinks; J Protheroe; Z Paskins
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.