Literature DB >> 22809748

Assessment of exposure to TDI and MDI during polyurethane foam production in Poland using integrated theoretical and experimental data.

Małgorzata Kupczewska-Dobecka1, Sławomir Czerczak2, Sławomir Brzeźnicki2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop an optimal strategy for the assessment of inhalation exposure to isocyanates such as TDI and MDI in the production of polyurethane foam by integration of theoretical and experimental data. ECETOC TRA and EASE predictive models were used to determine the estimated levels of exposure to isocyanates. The results of our study suggest that both applications EASE and ECETOC TRA can be used as a screening 1st Tier tool in this case study. PROC12 ECETOC TRA category can be linked to exposure on TDI during polyurethane foam manufacturing because it is working properly and exceeds 90th percentile measured concentration with factor 3 and the maximum measured value with factor 1, 5. The value estimated by using category PROC2 is underestimated so this category should not be linked to this scenario. At the same time, the applications of EASE overstate the expected concentrations although the scenario "Use in closed process" seems to underestimate the exposure at the "lower end". For MDI the both models estimate exposure in a conservative manner.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22809748     DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2012.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 1382-6689            Impact factor:   4.860


  5 in total

1.  Qualitative and quantitative differences between common control banding tools for nanomaterials in workplaces.

Authors:  Xiangjing Gao; Hua Zou; Zanrong Zhou; Weiming Yuan; Changjian Quan; Meibian Zhang; Shichuan Tang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 2.  Validity of Tier 1 Modelling Tools and Impacts on Exposure Assessments within REACH Registrations-ETEAM Project, Validation Studies and Consequences.

Authors:  Urs Schlueter; Martin Tischer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Comparison between Communicated and Calculated Exposure Estimates Obtained through Three Modeling Tools.

Authors:  Andrea Spinazzè; Francesca Borghi; Daniele Magni; Costanza Rovida; Monica Locatelli; Andrea Cattaneo; Domenico Maria Cavallo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  How to Obtain a Reliable Estimate of Occupational Exposure? Review and Discussion of Models' Reliability.

Authors:  Andrea Spinazzè; Francesca Borghi; Davide Campagnolo; Sabrina Rovelli; Marta Keller; Giacomo Fanti; Andrea Cattaneo; Domenico Maria Cavallo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  The ECETOC-Targeted Risk Assessment Tool for Worker Exposure Estimation in REACH Registration Dossiers of Chemical Substances-Current Developments.

Authors:  Jan Urbanus; Oliver Henschel; Qiang Li; Dave Marsh; Chris Money; Dook Noij; Paul van de Sandt; Joost van Rooij; Matthias Wormuth
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.