Literature DB >> 22809677

An ensemble-based approach to imputation of moderate-density genotypes for genomic selection with application to Angus cattle.

Chuanyu Sun1, Xiao-Lin Wu, Kent A Weigel, Guilherme J M Rosa, Stewart Bauck, Brent W Woodward, Robert D Schnabel, Jeremy F Taylor, Daniel Gianola.   

Abstract

Summary Imputation of moderate-density genotypes from low-density panels is of increasing interest in genomic selection, because it can dramatically reduce genotyping costs. Several imputation software packages have been developed, but they vary in imputation accuracy, and imputed genotypes may be inconsistent among methods. An AdaBoost-like approach is proposed to combine imputation results from several independent software packages, i.e. Beagle(v3.3), IMPUTE(v2.0), fastPHASE(v1.4), AlphaImpute, findhap(v2) and Fimpute(v2), with each package serving as a basic classifier in an ensemble-based system. The ensemble-based method computes weights sequentially for all classifiers, and combines results from component methods via weighted majority 'voting' to determine unknown genotypes. The data included 3078 registered Angus cattle, each genotyped with the Illumina BovineSNP50 BeadChip. SNP genotypes on three chromosomes (BTA1, BTA16 and BTA28) were used to compare imputation accuracy among methods, and the application involved the imputation of 50K genotypes covering 29 chromosomes based on a set of 5K genotypes. Beagle and Fimpute had the greatest accuracy among the six imputation packages, which ranged from 0·8677 to 0·9858. The proposed ensemble method was better than any of these packages, but the sequence of independent classifiers in the voting scheme affected imputation accuracy. The ensemble systems yielding the best imputation accuracies were those that had Beagle as first classifier, followed by one or two methods that utilized pedigree information. A salient feature of the proposed ensemble method is that it can solve imputation inconsistencies among different imputation methods, hence leading to a more reliable system for imputing genotypes relative to independent methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22809677     DOI: 10.1017/S001667231200033X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)        ISSN: 0016-6723            Impact factor:   1.588


  18 in total

1.  Assessing single-nucleotide polymorphism selection methods for the development of a low-density panel optimized for imputation in South African Drakensberger beef cattle.

Authors:  Simon F Lashmar; Donagh P Berry; Rian Pierneef; Farai C Muchadeyi; Carina Visser
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  High-density marker imputation accuracy in sixteen French cattle breeds.

Authors:  Chris Hozé; Marie-Noëlle Fouilloux; Eric Venot; François Guillaume; Romain Dassonneville; Sébastien Fritz; Vincent Ducrocq; Florence Phocas; Didier Boichard; Pascal Croiseau
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  A new approach for efficient genotype imputation using information from relatives.

Authors:  Mehdi Sargolzaei; Jacques P Chesnais; Flavio S Schenkel
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Accuracy of genotype imputation in Nelore cattle.

Authors:  Roberto Carvalheiro; Solomon A Boison; Haroldo H R Neves; Mehdi Sargolzaei; Flavio S Schenkel; Yuri T Utsunomiya; Ana Maria Pérez O'Brien; Johann Sölkner; John C McEwan; Curtis P Van Tassell; Tad S Sonstegard; José Fernando Garcia
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Effect of genotype imputation on genome-enabled prediction of complex traits: an empirical study with mice data.

Authors:  Vivian P S Felipe; Hayrettin Okut; Daniel Gianola; Martinho A Silva; Guilherme J M Rosa
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 2.797

6.  Accuracy of genome-wide imputation in Braford and Hereford beef cattle.

Authors:  Mario L Piccoli; José Braccini; Fernando F Cardoso; Medhi Sargolzaei; Steven G Larmer; Flávio S Schenkel
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 2.797

7.  Imputation of high-density genotypes in the Fleckvieh cattle population.

Authors:  Hubert Pausch; Bernhard Aigner; Reiner Emmerling; Christian Edel; Kay-Uwe Götz; Ruedi Fries
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  Accuracy of imputation using the most common sires as reference population in layer chickens.

Authors:  Marzieh Heidaritabar; Mario P L Calus; Addie Vereijken; Martien A M Groenen; John W M Bastiaansen
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.797

9.  Imputation of non-genotyped individuals based on genotyped relatives: assessing the imputation accuracy of a real case scenario in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Aniek C Bouwman; John M Hickey; Mario P L Calus; Roel F Veerkamp
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Error rate for imputation from the Illumina BovineSNP50 chip to the Illumina BovineHD chip.

Authors:  Chris Schrooten; Romain Dassonneville; Vincent Ducrocq; Rasmus F Brøndum; Mogens S Lund; Jun Chen; Zengting Liu; Oscar González-Recio; Juan Pena; Tom Druet
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.