Literature DB >> 22809472

Toxicological effects of cationic nanobubbles on the liver and kidneys: biomarkers for predicting the risk.

Tai-Long Pan1, Pei-Wen Wang, Saleh A Al-Suwayeh, Yi-Ju Huang, Jia-You Fang.   

Abstract

Nanobubbles with acoustical activity are used as both diagnostic and therapeutic carriers for detecting and treating diseases. We aimed to prepare nanobubbles and assess toxic responses to them in the liver and kidneys. The cytotoxicity of nanobubbles was determined by examining the viability of liver (HepG2) and kidney (293T) cell lines after a 24-h treatment at various concentrations (0.01-2%). Toxic effects of different formulations were compared by determining functional markers such as γ-glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) after intravenous administration of nanobubbles. Cationic nanobubbles caused concentration-dependent cytotoxicity against cultured cells with a more significant effect in the liver than in the kidneys. A significant reduction of viability was revealed at a concentration as low as 0.1%. Cational systems with soyaethyl morpholinium ethosulfate (SME) exhibited the greatest γ-GT level at 6-fold higher than the control. Immunohistochemistry detected liver fibrosis and inflammation with nanobubbles treatment, especially SME-containing ones at higher doses. According to plasma proteomic profiles, gelsolin and fetuin-B were significantly downregulated 3-fold in the high-dose SME-treated group. Transthyretin decreased by 6-fold in this group. The fibrinogen gamma chain expression was highly elevated. The results suggest that these protein biomarkers are sensitive for assessing the risk of nanobubble exposure. This study is the first to systematically evaluate the possible toxicity of nanobubbles in the liver and kidneys.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22809472     DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  5 in total

1.  Ultrasound-triggered phase transition sensitive magnetic fluorescent nanodroplets as a multimodal imaging contrast agent in rat and mouse model.

Authors:  Xin Cheng; Huan Li; Yunchao Chen; Binhua Luo; Xuhan Liu; Wei Liu; Haibo Xu; Xiangliang Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Cationic additives in nanosystems activate cytotoxicity and inflammatory response of human neutrophils: lipid nanoparticles versus polymeric nanoparticles.

Authors:  Tsong-Long Hwang; Ibrahim A Aljuffali; Chwan-Fwu Lin; Yuan-Ting Chang; Jia-You Fang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-01-07

3.  Stably engineered nanobubbles and ultrasound - An effective platform for enhanced macromolecular delivery to representative cells of the retina.

Authors:  Sachin S Thakur; Micheal S Ward; Amirali Popat; Nicole B Flemming; Marie-Odile Parat; Nigel L Barnett; Harendra S Parekh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Cyanine 5.5 conjugated nanobubbles as a tumor selective contrast agent for dual ultrasound-fluorescence imaging in a mouse model.

Authors:  Liyi Mai; Anna Yao; Jing Li; Qiong Wei; Ming Yuchi; Xiaoling He; Mingyue Ding; Qibing Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Toxicity Assessment of PEG-PCCL Nanoparticles and Preliminary Investigation on Its Anti-tumor Effect of Paclitaxel-Loading.

Authors:  Wei Li; Wanyi Li; Yu Kuang; Ting Yang; Jie Zhu; Zilin Xu; Xiang Yuan; Mingyuan Li; Zhongwei Zhang; Yuan Yang
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.703

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.