Literature DB >> 22808583

The effects of distractors in multiple object tracking are modulated by the similarity of distractor and target features.

Cary S Feria1.   

Abstract

Is the effect of distractors in multiple object tracking dependent on the distractors sharing the features of the targets? In experiment 1, observers tracked five targets among five distractors that were identical to the targets and a number of additional distractors that were either identical to or featurally distinct from the targets. Results showed that distractors that are distinct from the targets in shape or color, or are stationary, impair tracking less than distractors that are identical to the targets. However, tracking performance declined as the number of distractors increased, even for featurally distinct distractors. Experiment 2 showed that distractors that differ from the targets on two features impair tracking less than distractors that differ from the targets on only one feature, but only when target tracking load is low. These results indicate that shape, color, and motion information about distractors can be used to distinguish them from targets during tracking, although even distractors with a different feature from the targets produce some interference with tracking. These findings suggest that the effect of distractors on tracking is dependent on top-down settings for target features.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22808583     DOI: 10.1068/p7053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  11 in total

1.  Multiple identity tracking strategies vary by age: An ERP study.

Authors:  Didem Pehlivanoglu; Audrey Duarte; Paul Verhaeghen
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Hue distinctiveness overrides category in determining performance in multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Mengdan Sun; Xuemin Zhang; Lingxia Fan; Luming Hu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Satisfaction in motion: Subsequent search misses are more likely in moving search displays.

Authors:  Cary Stothart; Andrew Clement; James R Brockmole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

4.  The role of spatial configuration in multiple identity tracking.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; Qiyang Gao; Yan Ye; Jifan Zhou; Rende Shui; Mowei Shen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Camouflaging moving objects: crypsis and masquerade.

Authors:  Joanna R Hall; Roland Baddeley; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Adam J Shohet; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 2.671

6.  Interactive multiple object tracking (iMOT).

Authors:  Ian M Thornton; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Todd S Horowitz; Aksel Rynning; Seong-Whan Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Categorical Distinction Between Targets and Distractors Facilitates Tracking in Multiple Identity Tracking Task.

Authors:  Liuqing Wei; Xuemin Zhang; Chuang Lyu; Zhen Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-04-28

8.  Additivity of Feature-Based and Symmetry-Based Grouping Effects in Multiple Object Tracking.

Authors:  Chundi Wang; Xuemin Zhang; Yongna Li; Chuang Lyu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-04

9.  Effect of depth information on multiple-object tracking in three dimensions: A probabilistic perspective.

Authors:  James R H Cooke; Arjan C Ter Horst; Robert J van Beers; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 10.  A critical systematic review of the Neurotracker perceptual-cognitive training tool.

Authors:  Christian Vater; Rob Gray; Alex O Holcombe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-04-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.