| Literature DB >> 22808243 |
Mirre J P Simons1, Michael Briga, Egbert Koetsier, Remco Folkertsma, Matthias D Wubs, Cor Dijkstra, Simon Verhulst.
Abstract
Sexual traits can serve as honest indicators of phenotypic quality when they are costly. Brightly coloured yellow to red traits, which are pigmented by carotenoids, are relatively common in birds, and feature in sexual selection. Carotenoids have been linked to immune and antioxidant function, and the trade-off between ornamentation and these physiological functions provides a potential mechanism rendering carotenoid based signals costly. Mutual ornamentation is also common in birds and can be maintained by mutual mate choice for this ornament or by a correlated response in one sex to selection on the other sex. When selection pressures differ between the sexes this can cause intralocus sexual conflict. Sexually antagonistic selection pressures have been demonstrated for few sexual traits, and for carotenoid-dependent traits there is a single example: bill redness was found to be positively associated with survival and reproductive output in male zebra finches, but negatively so in females. We retested these associations in our captive zebra finch population without two possible limitations of this earlier study. Contrary to the earlier findings, we found no evidence for sexually antagonistic selection. In both sexes, individuals with redder bills showed higher survival. This association disappeared among the females with the reddest bills. Furthermore, females with redder bills achieved higher reproductive output. We conclude that bill redness of male and female zebra finches honestly signals phenotypic quality, and discuss the possible causes of the differences between our results and earlier findings.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22808243 PMCID: PMC3395645 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040721
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Bill hue and survival.
Survival of males (left panel) and females (right panel) in relation to bill hue categories (tertiles). Note that data are shown for bill hue tertiles but bill hue was entered as continuous variable in the analyses. In both sexes individuals with low redness survive worst. In females a quadratic relationship of survival with bill hue was detected (see main text).
Proportional hazard models including both sexes.
| model | parameter | estimate | s.e. | p value |
| without quadraticterm | bill hue | −0.090 | 0.026 | 0.00029 |
| sex | −0.21 | 0.25 | 0.39 | |
| age at measurement | 0.00097 | 0.00041 | 0.015 | |
| sex X bill hue(omitted) | −0.0059 | 0.051 | 0.91 | |
| with quadratic term | bill hue | −0.037 | 0.037 | 0.32 |
| bill hue2 | 0.024 | 0.0066 | 0.00027 | |
| sex | 0.45 | 0.39 | 0.25 | |
| age at measurement | 0.0010 | 0.00042 | 0.013 | |
| sex X bill hue | −0.10 | 0.071 | 0.14 | |
| sex X bill hue2 | −0.031 | 0.010 | 0.0023 |
Proportional hazard model within males.
| parameter | estimate | s.e. | p value |
| bill hue | −0.1 | 0.034 | 0.0056 |
| bill hue2 (omitted) | −0.0067 | 0.0076 | 0.38 |
| age at measurement | 0.00066 | 0.00061 | 0.28 |
Proportional hazard models within females.
| model | parameter | estimate | s.e. | p value |
| all females | bill hue | −0.04 | 0.038 | 0.32 |
| bill hue2 | 0.026 | 0.0076 | 0.00081 | |
| age at measurement | 0.0013 | 0.00058 | 0.028 | |
| females with hue < optimum | bill hue | −0.26 | 0.093 | 0.0051 |
| age at measurement | 0.0028 | 0.001 | 0.0043 | |
| females with hue > optimum | bill hue | 0.22 | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| age at measurement | 0.00015 | 0.00079 | 0.85 |
Figure 2Bill hue and fledgling production.
Fledgling production (standardised by dividing it by the median fledgling production per batch, thus not corrected for differences in longevity; see main text) of males (left panel) and females (right panel) in relation to bill hue. Only in females was redder bill hue significantly associated with reproductive success (see main text).