Literature DB >> 22807813

8-Hy-droxy-5-(hy-droxy-meth-yl)quinolin-1-ium chloride.

Majda Fathi, Youssef Fouham, El Hassan Arbib, Brahim Lakhrissi, Mohamed Saadi, Lahcen El Ammari.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(10)H(10)NO(2) (+)·Cl(-), contains a quinoline ring system which is essentially planar, with the largest deviation from the mean plane being 0.017 (1) Å. In the crystal, the ion pairs and their inversion-symmetry-related partners are linked by N-H⋯Cl and O-H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds to form tetramers which are further connected through O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, building infinite one-dimensional chains parallel to the [010] direction.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22807813      PMCID: PMC3393256          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812024233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For anti­oxidant properties, see: Kayyali et al. (1998 ▶). For the synthesis of some substituted 8-quinolinol derivatives, see: Mishra et al. (2004 ▶). For the application of the corresponding aluminium complexes, see: Tang et al. (1989 ▶); Chen & Shi (1998 ▶); Shougen et al. (2000 ▶). For application as a promising display, see: Cao et al. (1996 ▶); Wu et al. (2003 ▶). For the synthesis, see: Zheng et al. (2005 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C10H10NO2 +·Cl− M = 211.64 Monoclinic, a = 6.9081 (5) Å b = 8.0577 (5) Å c = 17.1890 (11) Å β = 101.183 (3)° V = 938.63 (11) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.38 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.54 × 0.43 × 0.12 mm

Data collection

Bruker X8 APEX diffractometer 22727 measured reflections 4615 independent reflections 3679 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.024

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.039 wR(F 2) = 0.124 S = 1.07 4615 reflections 127 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.50 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: APEX2; data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2005 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812024233/fj2562sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812024233/fj2562Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812024233/fj2562Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H10NO2+·ClF(000) = 440
Mr = 211.64Dx = 1.498 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -p_2ybcCell parameters from 4615 reflections
a = 6.9081 (5) Åθ = 2.8–36.5°
b = 8.0577 (5) ŵ = 0.38 mm1
c = 17.1890 (11) ÅT = 296 K
β = 101.183 (3)°Needle, colourless
V = 938.63 (11) Å30.54 × 0.43 × 0.12 mm
Z = 4
Bruker X8 APEX diffractometer3679 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.024
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 36.5°, θmin = 2.8°
φ and ω scansh = −11→11
22727 measured reflectionsk = −12→13
4615 independent reflectionsl = −28→28
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.124H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.07w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0694P)2 + 0.1142P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
4615 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
127 parametersΔρmax = 0.50 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.20 e Å3
Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against all reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on all data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.16928 (4)0.17354 (3)0.310398 (15)0.03843 (8)
O10.30276 (12)0.22164 (9)0.51946 (4)0.03652 (16)
H1O0.33420.15250.55470.055*
O20.44071 (12)0.98428 (9)0.61542 (5)0.03859 (17)
H2O0.55090.94550.63160.058*
N10.19725 (11)0.47152 (9)0.41916 (4)0.02749 (14)
H1N0.19960.36990.40410.033*
C10.14320 (16)0.58746 (13)0.36492 (5)0.03366 (18)
H10.10750.55780.31180.040*
C20.13937 (16)0.75383 (12)0.38682 (6)0.0362 (2)
H20.10260.83550.34860.043*
C30.19059 (14)0.79558 (11)0.46549 (6)0.03077 (17)
H30.18870.90640.48040.037*
C40.24629 (12)0.67260 (10)0.52439 (5)0.02444 (14)
C50.24952 (12)0.50630 (10)0.49814 (5)0.02361 (14)
C60.30430 (13)0.37354 (10)0.55186 (5)0.02688 (15)
C70.35081 (16)0.40924 (12)0.63135 (5)0.03253 (18)
H70.38460.32390.66790.039*
C80.34767 (16)0.57403 (12)0.65797 (5)0.03347 (18)
H80.38070.59480.71210.040*
C90.29775 (14)0.70577 (11)0.60713 (5)0.02761 (15)
C100.29652 (17)0.87978 (12)0.63908 (6)0.03501 (19)
H10A0.16690.92790.62090.042*
H10B0.32000.87530.69650.042*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.04035 (14)0.03721 (14)0.03423 (12)0.00236 (9)−0.00147 (9)−0.00972 (8)
O10.0523 (4)0.0204 (3)0.0344 (3)0.0019 (3)0.0024 (3)0.0011 (2)
O20.0372 (4)0.0224 (3)0.0521 (4)−0.0014 (2)−0.0014 (3)0.0061 (3)
N10.0306 (3)0.0242 (3)0.0260 (3)−0.0013 (2)0.0016 (2)−0.0007 (2)
C10.0395 (5)0.0317 (4)0.0265 (4)−0.0006 (3)−0.0018 (3)0.0027 (3)
C20.0431 (5)0.0286 (4)0.0326 (4)0.0007 (4)−0.0034 (4)0.0066 (3)
C30.0334 (4)0.0218 (3)0.0342 (4)0.0001 (3)−0.0006 (3)0.0035 (3)
C40.0243 (3)0.0209 (3)0.0274 (3)−0.0018 (2)0.0033 (3)0.0011 (2)
C50.0242 (3)0.0209 (3)0.0251 (3)−0.0015 (2)0.0034 (2)0.0013 (2)
C60.0304 (4)0.0207 (3)0.0289 (3)−0.0018 (3)0.0043 (3)0.0028 (3)
C70.0432 (5)0.0253 (4)0.0277 (4)−0.0024 (3)0.0037 (3)0.0053 (3)
C80.0450 (5)0.0295 (4)0.0254 (3)−0.0046 (4)0.0057 (3)0.0009 (3)
C90.0317 (4)0.0232 (3)0.0280 (3)−0.0040 (3)0.0060 (3)−0.0014 (3)
C100.0425 (5)0.0263 (4)0.0369 (4)−0.0026 (3)0.0094 (4)−0.0061 (3)
O1—C61.3439 (11)C3—H30.9300
O1—H1O0.8200C4—C51.4155 (11)
O2—C101.4225 (13)C4—C91.4229 (12)
O2—H2O0.8200C5—C61.4158 (11)
N1—C11.3215 (12)C6—C71.3721 (13)
N1—C51.3644 (11)C7—C81.4059 (14)
N1—H1N0.8600C7—H70.9300
C1—C21.3941 (14)C8—C91.3757 (13)
C1—H10.9300C8—H80.9300
C2—C31.3718 (14)C9—C101.5065 (12)
C2—H20.9300C10—H10A0.9700
C3—C41.4155 (12)C10—H10B0.9700
C6—O1—H1O109.5C4—C5—C6121.75 (7)
C10—O2—H2O109.5O1—C6—C7125.81 (8)
C1—N1—C5122.74 (8)O1—C6—C5115.99 (8)
C1—N1—H1N118.6C7—C6—C5118.19 (8)
C5—N1—H1N118.6C6—C7—C8120.44 (8)
N1—C1—C2120.45 (9)C6—C7—H7119.8
N1—C1—H1119.8C8—C7—H7119.8
C2—C1—H1119.8C9—C8—C7122.67 (8)
C3—C2—C1119.16 (8)C9—C8—H8118.7
C3—C2—H2120.4C7—C8—H8118.7
C1—C2—H2120.4C8—C9—C4118.25 (8)
C2—C3—C4121.05 (8)C8—C9—C10120.34 (8)
C2—C3—H3119.5C4—C9—C10121.41 (8)
C4—C3—H3119.5O2—C10—C9113.14 (8)
C3—C4—C5116.98 (8)O2—C10—H10A109.0
C3—C4—C9124.33 (8)C9—C10—H10A109.0
C5—C4—C9118.69 (7)O2—C10—H10B109.0
N1—C5—C4119.60 (7)C9—C10—H10B109.0
N1—C5—C6118.65 (7)H10A—C10—H10B107.8
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N···Cl10.862.243.0261 (8)152
O1—H1O···O2i0.821.782.5841 (10)166
O2—H2O···Cl1ii0.822.213.0281 (8)172
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1N⋯Cl10.862.243.0261 (8)152
O1—H1O⋯O2i 0.821.782.5841 (10)166
O2—H2O⋯Cl1ii 0.822.213.0281 (8)172

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  5 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Design, synthesis, and evaluation of novel bifunctional iron-chelators as potential agents for neuroprotection in Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and other neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Hailin Zheng; Lev M Weiner; Orit Bar-Am; Silvina Epsztejn; Z Ioav Cabantchik; Abraham Warshawsky; Moussa B H Youdim; Mati Fridkin
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Improved quantum efficiency for electroluminescence in semiconducting polymers.

Authors:  Yong Cao; Ian D Parker; Gang Yu; Chi Zhang; Alan J Heeger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-02-04       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Comparative radical scavenging ability of bidentate iron (III) chelators.

Authors:  R Kayyali; A S Pannala; H Khodr; R C Hider
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 5.858

5.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.