The title compound, [SnCl₂(C₅H₄NS)₂], is the product of reaction of 2,2'-dipyridyl disulfide with tin tetra-chloride. The Sn(IV) atom adopts a distorted octa-hedral geometry, with the two bidentate pyridine-2-thiol-ate ligands forming two planar four-membered chelate rings. The two Sn-Cl, two Sn-N and two Sn-S bonds are in cis, cis and trans configurations, respectively. The crystal grown from acetonitrile represents a new monoclinic polymorph in space group C2/c with the mol-ecule having twofold rotational symmetry, the Sn(IV) atom lying on the twofold axis. The mol-ecular structure of the monoclinic polymorph is very close to that of the triclinic polymorph studied previously in space group P-1, the mol-ecule occupying a general position [Masaki & Matsunami (1976 ▶). Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 49, 3274-3279; Masaki et al. (1978 ▶). Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 51, 3298-3301]. Apparently, the formation of the two polymorphs is determined by the different systems of inter-molecular inter-actions. In the crystal of the monoclinic polymorph, mol-ecules are bound into ribbons along the c axis by C-H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds, whereas in the crystal of the triclinic polymorph, mol-ecules form chains along the a axis by attractive S⋯S inter-actions. The crystal studied was a pseudo-merohedral twin; the refined BASF value is 0.221 (1).
The title compound, [SnCl₂(C₅H₄NS)₂], is the product of reaction of 2,2'-dipyridyl disulfide with tintetra-chloride. The Sn(IV) atom adopts a distorted octa-hedral geometry, with the two bidentatepyridine-2-thiol-ate ligands forming two planar four-membered chelate rings. The two Sn-Cl, two Sn-N and two Sn-S bonds are in cis, cis and trans configurations, respectively. The crystal grown from acetonitrile represents a new monoclinic polymorph in space group C2/c with the mol-ecule having twofold rotational symmetry, the Sn(IV) atom lying on the twofold axis. The mol-ecular structure of the monoclinic polymorph is very close to that of the triclinic polymorph studied previously in space group P-1, the mol-ecule occupying a general position [Masaki & Matsunami (1976 ▶). Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 49, 3274-3279; Masaki et al. (1978 ▶). Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 51, 3298-3301]. Apparently, the formation of the two polymorphs is determined by the different systems of inter-molecular inter-actions. In the crystal of the monoclinic polymorph, mol-ecules are bound into ribbons along the c axis by C-H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds, whereas in the crystal of the triclinic polymorph, mol-ecules form chains along the a axis by attractive S⋯S inter-actions. The crystal studied was a pseudo-merohedral twin; the refined BASF value is 0.221 (1).
For metalcomplexes with 2,2′-dipyridyl dichalcogenides, see: Kadooka et al. (1976a
▶,b
▶); Cheng et al. (1996 ▶); Kienitz et al. (1996 ▶); Bell et al. (2000 ▶); Kita et al. (2001 ▶); Kedarnath et al. (2009 ▶). For the triclinic polymorph, see: Masaki & Matsunami (1976 ▶); Masaki et al. (1978 ▶).
Bruker SMART 1K CCD diffractometerAbsorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1998 ▶) T
min = 0.678, T
max = 0.7796681 measured reflections1584 independent reflections1562 reflections with I > 2σ(I)R
int = 0.024
Refinement
R[F
2 > 2σ(F
2)] = 0.020wR(F
2) = 0.050S = 1.001584 reflections79 parametersH-atom parameters constrainedΔρmax = 0.81 e Å−3Δρmin = −0.53 e Å−3Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1998 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812024026/rk2356sup1.cifStructure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812024026/rk2356Isup2.hklAdditional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.020
Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.050
H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.00
w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.014P)2 + 7.75P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1584 reflections
(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
79 parameters
Δρmax = 0.81 e Å−3
0 restraints
Δρmin = −0.53 e Å−3
Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes)
are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken
into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles
and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only
used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic)
treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted
R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on
F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F,
with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression
of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating
R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of
reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are
statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and
R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
Authors: Gunay Z Mammadova; Sheyda R Ismaylova; Zhanna V Matsulevich; Vladimir K Osmanov; Alexander V Borisov; Victor N Khrustalev Journal: Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online Date: 2013-06-08