Literature DB >> 22807714

cis-Diamminedichloridoplatinum(II) N,N-dimethyl-formamide monosolvate.

Dean H Johnston1, Nathanael A Miller, Cory B Tackett.   

Abstract

In the title compound, cis-[PtCl₂(NH₃)₂]·C₃H₇NO, the metal complex mol-ecules are stacked parallel to the b axis, forming close Pt⋯Pt inter-actions of 3.4071 (7) and 3.5534 (8) Å and weak N-H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds between the ammine ligand and the Cl atoms of the neighboring complex. Conventional N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds are formed between ammine ligands and the O atom of adjacent N,N-dimethyl-formamide mol-ecules. The crystal was found to be a split crystal and was analyzed using two domains related by a rotation of ca 4.4° about the reciprocal axis (-0.351 1.000 0.742) and refined to give a minor component fraction of 0.084 (6).

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22807714      PMCID: PMC3393146          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812024014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For a review of platinum anti­cancer coordination compounds, see: Reedijk (2009 ▶). For the preparation of cis-diamminedichloridoplatinum(II), see: Kukushikin et al. (1998 ▶). For single-crystal X-ray and neutron diffraction studies of cis-diamminedichloridoplatinum(II), see: Milburn & Truter (1966 ▶); Ting et al. (2010 ▶). For vibrational studies, see: Nakamoto et al. (1965 ▶). For crystallographic studies of dimethyl­formamide solvates and complexes of cis-diamminedichlorido­platinum(II) and related compounds, see: Raudaschl et al. (1983 ▶, 1985 ▶); Raudaschl-Sieber et al. (1986 ▶); Alston et al. (1985 ▶). For a crystallographic study of palladium analogs, see: Kirik et al. (1996 ▶). For a detailed analysis of linear chainstructures in platinum(II) complexes, see: Connick et al. (1997 ▶). For an analysis of hydrogen bonding in platinumammine complexes, see: Brammer et al. (1987 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[PtCl2(NH3)2]·C3H7NO M = 373.15 Triclinic, a = 6.2344 (9) Å b = 6.8196 (11) Å c = 11.5833 (18) Å α = 105.285 (4)° β = 96.061 (4)° γ = 97.809 (4)° V = 465.47 (12) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 15.59 mm−1 T = 200 K 0.46 × 0.36 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART X2S benchtop diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (TWINABS; Bruker, 2009 ▶) T min = 0.05, T max = 0.30 7440 measured reflections 1620 independent reflections 1484 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.043

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.028 wR(F 2) = 0.072 S = 1.07 1620 reflections 96 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 1.44 e Å−3 Δρmin = −2.08 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 and GIS (Bruker, 2009 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶) and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▶); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 ▶) and POV-RAY (Cason, 2004 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812024014/pk2417sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812024014/pk2417Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812024014/pk2417Isup3.mol Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[PtCl2(NH3)2]·C3H7NOZ = 2
Mr = 373.15F(000) = 344
Triclinic, P1Dx = 2.662 Mg m3
a = 6.2344 (9) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 6.8196 (11) ÅCell parameters from 1090 reflections
c = 11.5833 (18) Åθ = 3.3–24.8°
α = 105.285 (4)°µ = 15.59 mm1
β = 96.061 (4)°T = 200 K
γ = 97.809 (4)°Plate, clear yellow
V = 465.47 (12) Å30.46 × 0.36 × 0.10 mm
Bruker SMART X2S benchtop diffractometer1620 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1484 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Doubly curved silicon crystal monochromatorRint = 0.043
Detector resolution: 8.3330 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.1°, θmin = 3.1°
ω scansh = −7→7
Absorption correction: multi-scan (TWINABS; Bruker, 2009)k = −8→7
Tmin = 0.05, Tmax = 0.30l = 0→13
7440 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.072H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.07w = 1/[σ2(Fo2)]
1620 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
96 parametersΔρmax = 1.44 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −2.08 e Å3
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Pt10.55286 (4)0.74780 (4)0.49265 (2)0.01388 (13)
Cl10.6813 (3)0.6374 (3)0.31075 (18)0.0250 (4)
Cl20.8971 (3)0.7991 (3)0.60324 (18)0.0244 (4)
N10.4361 (11)0.8403 (11)0.6522 (6)0.0211 (15)
H1D0.54430.92660.70890.025*
H1E0.38940.72810.67720.025*
H1F0.32220.90760.64190.025*
N20.2485 (11)0.6999 (11)0.3960 (6)0.0236 (15)
H2D0.17060.79430.43450.028*
H2E0.17860.57060.38970.028*
H2F0.26040.71350.32080.028*
O11.2567 (10)0.8302 (10)1.1506 (5)0.0335 (15)
N30.9601 (11)0.7534 (9)1.0048 (6)0.0254 (17)
C10.7242 (15)0.7227 (15)0.9760 (9)0.041 (2)
H1A0.65980.75111.05100.061*
H1B0.66940.57970.92790.061*
H1C0.68360.81650.92940.061*
C21.0852 (17)0.7125 (15)0.9063 (8)0.037 (2)
H2A1.24110.76120.93740.055*
H2B1.03890.78450.84760.055*
H2C1.06080.56370.86670.055*
C31.0583 (16)0.8090 (13)1.1198 (7)0.027 (2)
H30.96860.83391.18180.032*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Pt10.01315 (19)0.01376 (19)0.01392 (18)0.00092 (13)0.00190 (12)0.00322 (13)
Cl10.0266 (11)0.0290 (11)0.0192 (10)0.0044 (9)0.0089 (8)0.0044 (8)
Cl20.0164 (10)0.0311 (12)0.0230 (10)0.0032 (9)−0.0005 (8)0.0049 (9)
N10.018 (4)0.022 (4)0.019 (3)−0.001 (3)0.000 (3)0.003 (3)
N20.020 (4)0.029 (4)0.023 (4)0.005 (3)0.003 (3)0.010 (3)
O10.030 (4)0.037 (4)0.025 (3)0.005 (3)−0.005 (3)−0.001 (3)
N30.031 (5)0.020 (4)0.022 (4)0.003 (3)0.001 (3)0.003 (3)
C10.036 (6)0.040 (6)0.045 (6)−0.001 (5)−0.007 (5)0.017 (5)
C20.049 (6)0.038 (6)0.022 (5)0.008 (5)0.001 (4)0.009 (4)
C30.042 (6)0.023 (5)0.013 (4)0.006 (4)0.001 (4)0.001 (4)
Pt1—N12.034 (6)N3—C31.339 (10)
Pt1—N22.037 (6)N3—C21.437 (11)
Pt1—Cl12.3088 (19)N3—C11.447 (11)
Pt1—Cl22.313 (2)C1—H1A0.9800
N1—H1D0.9100C1—H1B0.9800
N1—H1E0.9100C1—H1C0.9800
N1—H1F0.9100C2—H2A0.9800
N2—H2D0.9100C2—H2B0.9800
N2—H2E0.9100C2—H2C0.9800
N2—H2F0.9100C3—H30.9500
O1—C31.229 (11)
N1—Pt1—N291.8 (3)C3—N3—C2120.9 (8)
N1—Pt1—Cl1178.99 (19)C3—N3—C1120.9 (8)
N2—Pt1—Cl187.6 (2)C2—N3—C1118.1 (8)
N1—Pt1—Cl287.9 (2)N3—C1—H1A109.5
N2—Pt1—Cl2179.34 (18)N3—C1—H1B109.5
Cl1—Pt1—Cl292.63 (7)H1A—C1—H1B109.5
Pt1—N1—H1D109.5N3—C1—H1C109.5
Pt1—N1—H1E109.5H1A—C1—H1C109.5
H1D—N1—H1E109.5H1B—C1—H1C109.5
Pt1—N1—H1F109.5N3—C2—H2A109.5
H1D—N1—H1F109.5N3—C2—H2B109.5
H1E—N1—H1F109.5H2A—C2—H2B109.5
Pt1—N2—H2D109.5N3—C2—H2C109.5
Pt1—N2—H2E109.5H2A—C2—H2C109.5
H2D—N2—H2E109.5H2B—C2—H2C109.5
Pt1—N2—H2F109.5O1—C3—N3124.3 (8)
H2D—N2—H2F109.5O1—C3—H3117.8
H2E—N2—H2F109.5N3—C3—H3117.8
C2—N3—C3—O10.3 (12)C1—N3—C3—O1177.2 (8)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1E···Cl1i0.912.513.389 (7)161
N2—H2E···Cl2i0.912.533.403 (7)162
N1—H1D···O1ii0.912.133.023 (9)167
N2—H2F···O1iii0.912.313.198 (9)165
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1E⋯Cl1i 0.912.513.389 (7)161
N2—H2E⋯Cl2i 0.912.533.403 (7)162
N1—H1D⋯O1ii 0.912.133.023 (9)167
N2—H2F⋯O1iii 0.912.313.198 (9)165

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  3 in total

1.  Cisplatin: polymorphism and structural insights into an important chemotherapeutic drug.

Authors:  Valeska P Ting; Marc Schmidtmann; Chick C Wilson; Mark T Weller
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.