Literature DB >> 22807599

Estimating the cost of new public health legislation.

Nick Wilson1, Nhung Nghiem, Rachel Foster, Linda Cobiac, Tony Blakely.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a new method for estimating the cost to governments of enacting public health legislation.
METHODS: We adopted a central government perspective in estimating costs. The parliamentary cost of legislative acts and regulations in New Zealand was calculated from the proportion of parliamentary time devoted to law-making (i.e. sitting days in the debating chamber), and the cost of associated policy advice from government agencies was calculated from the proportion of documented policy issues related to law-making. The relative costs of acts and regulations were estimated from the number of pages in the legislation.
FINDINGS: We estimated that, between 1999 and 2010, 26.7% of parliamentary resources and 16.7% of policy advice from government agencies were devoted to generating new laws in New Zealand. The mean cost of an act was 2.6 million United States dollars (US$; 95% uncertainty interval, UI: 1.5 to 4.4 million) and the mean cost of a regulation was US$ 382 000 (95% UI: 22 000 to 665 000). For comparison, the average cost of a bill enacted by the 50 state governments in the United States of America between 2008 and 2009 was US$ 980 000.
CONCLUSION: We were able to estimate the cost of new legislation in New Zealand. Our method for estimating this cost seemed to capture the main government costs involved and appears to be generally applicable to other developed countries. Ideally such costs should be included in economic evaluations of public health interventions that involve new legislation.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22807599      PMCID: PMC3397705          DOI: 10.2471/BLT.11.097584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


  7 in total

1.  The benefits and harms of alcohol use in New Zealand: what politicians might consider.

Authors:  Nick Wilson; Fiona Imlach Gunasekara; George Thomson
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2011-06-10

2.  Cost-effectiveness of interventions to reduce dietary salt intake.

Authors:  Linda J Cobiac; Theo Vos; J Lennert Veerman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Law and public health at CDC.

Authors:  Richard A Goodman; A Moulton; G Matthews; F Shaw; P Kocher; G Mensah; S Zaza; R Besser
Journal:  MMWR Suppl       Date:  2006-12-22

4.  The scientific basis for law as a public health tool.

Authors:  Anthony D Moulton; Shawna L Mercer; Tanja Popovic; Peter A Briss; Richard A Goodman; Melisa L Thombley; Robert A Hahn; Daniel M Fox
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  General purpose computer-assisted clustering and conceptualization.

Authors:  Justin Grimmer; Gary King
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Role of law in global response to non-communicable diseases.

Authors:  Roger Magnusson; David Patterson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Chronic disease prevention: health effects and financial costs of strategies to reduce salt intake and control tobacco use.

Authors:  Perviz Asaria; Dan Chisholm; Colin Mathers; Majid Ezzati; Robert Beaglehole
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 79.321

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Investing in breastfeeding - the world breastfeeding costing initiative.

Authors:  Radha Holla-Bhar; Alessandro Iellamo; Arun Gupta; Julie P Smith; Jai Prakash Dadhich
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.461

2.  Study protocol: combining experimental methods, econometrics and simulation modelling to determine price elasticities for studying food taxes and subsidies (The Price ExaM Study).

Authors:  Wilma E Waterlander; Tony Blakely; Nhung Nghiem; Christine L Cleghorn; Helen Eyles; Murat Genc; Nick Wilson; Yannan Jiang; Boyd Swinburn; Liana Jacobi; Jo Michie; Cliona Ni Mhurchu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Modelled health benefits of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax across different socioeconomic groups in Australia: A cost-effectiveness and equity analysis.

Authors:  Anita Lal; Ana Maria Mantilla-Herrera; Lennert Veerman; Kathryn Backholer; Gary Sacks; Marjory Moodie; Mohammad Siahpush; Rob Carter; Anna Peeters
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 11.069

4.  Can a Greenhouse Gas Emissions Tax on Food also Be Healthy and Equitable? A Systemised Review and Modelling Study from Aotearoa New Zealand.

Authors:  Christine Cleghorn; Ingrid Mulder; Alex Macmillan; Anja Mizdrak; Jonathan Drew; Nhung Nghiem; Tony Blakely; Cliona Ni Mhurchu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Potential effect of real-world junk food and sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on population health, health system costs and greenhouse gas emissions in New Zealand: a modelling study.

Authors:  Leah Grout; Anja Mizdrak; Nhung Nghiem; Amanda C Jones; Tony Blakely; Cliona Ni Mhurchu; Christine Cleghorn
Journal:  BMJ Nutr Prev Health       Date:  2022-02-07

6.  Health and economic impacts of eight different dietary salt reduction interventions.

Authors:  Nhung Nghiem; Tony Blakely; Linda J Cobiac; Amber L Pearson; Nick Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Health, Health Inequality, and Cost Impacts of Annual Increases in Tobacco Tax: Multistate Life Table Modeling in New Zealand.

Authors:  Tony Blakely; Linda J Cobiac; Christine L Cleghorn; Amber L Pearson; Frederieke S van der Deen; Giorgi Kvizhinadze; Nhung Nghiem; Melissa McLeod; Nick Wilson
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  The health gains and cost savings of dietary salt reduction interventions, with equity and age distributional aspects.

Authors:  Nhung Nghiem; Tony Blakely; Linda J Cobiac; Christine L Cleghorn; Nick Wilson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.