Literature DB >> 22807338

Neural adaptation to thin and fat bodies in the fusiform body area and middle occipital gyrus: an fMRI adaptation study.

Dennis Hummel1, Anne K Rudolf, Marie-Luise Brandi, Karl-Heinz Untch, Ralph Grabhorn, Harald Hampel, Harald M Mohr.   

Abstract

Visual perception can be strongly biased due to exposure to specific stimuli in the environment, often causing neural adaptation and visual aftereffects. In this study, we investigated whether adaptation to certain body shapes biases the perception of the own body shape. Furthermore, we aimed to evoke neural adaptation to certain body shapes. Participants completed a behavioral experiment (n = 14) to rate manipulated pictures of their own bodies after adaptation to demonstratively thin or fat pictures of their own bodies. The same stimuli were used in a second experiment (n = 16) using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) adaptation. In the behavioral experiment, after adapting to a thin picture of the own body participants also judged a thinner than actual body picture to be the most realistic and vice versa, resembling a typical aftereffect. The fusiform body area (FBA) and the right middle occipital gyrus (rMOG) show neural adaptation to specific body shapes while the extrastriate body area (EBA) bilaterally does not. The rMOG cluster is highly selective for bodies and perhaps body parts. The findings of the behavioral experiment support the existence of a perceptual body shape aftereffect, resulting from a specific adaptation to thin and fat pictures of one's own body. The fMRI results imply that body shape adaptation occurs in the FBA and the rMOG. The role of the EBA in body shape processing remains unclear. The results are also discussed in the light of clinical body image disturbances.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; body image; body image disturbances; body shape; eating disorders; extrastriate body area; fMRI; fusiform body area; middle occipital gyrus

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22807338      PMCID: PMC6870049          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  57 in total

Review 1.  Visual aftereffects: cortical neurons change their tune.

Authors:  Mark Georgeson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Magnetic stimulation of extrastriate body area impairs visual processing of nonfacial body parts.

Authors:  Cosimo Urgesi; Giovanni Berlucchi; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Representation of body identity and body actions in extrastriate body area and ventral premotor cortex.

Authors:  Cosimo Urgesi; Matteo Candidi; Silvio Ionta; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-12-10       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Feature-based attention modulates orientation-selective responses in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu; Jonas Larsson; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Mental body distance comparison: a tool for assessing clinical disturbances in visual body image.

Authors:  Monique A M Smeets; Irene G Klugkist; Sanneke van Rooden; Helen A Anema; Albert Postma
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2009-04-29

6.  Adaptation alters perceived direction of motion.

Authors:  E Levinson; R Sekuler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Neural correlates of viewing photographs of one's own body and another woman's body in anorexia and bulimia nervosa: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Silja Vocks; Martin Busch; Dietrich Grönemeyer; Dietmar Schulte; Stephan Herpertz; Boris Suchan
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.186

8.  An fMRI investigation of emotional processing of body shape in bulimia nervosa.

Authors:  Diane L Spangler; Mark D Allen
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 4.861

9.  A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body.

Authors:  P E Downing; Y Jiang; M Shuman; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Separating two components of body image in anorexia nervosa using fMRI.

Authors:  H M Mohr; J Zimmermann; C Röder; C Lenz; G Overbeck; R Grabhorn
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 7.723

View more
  18 in total

1.  Localized brain volume and white matter integrity alterations in adolescent anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Guido K W Frank; Megan E Shott; Jennifer O Hagman; Tony T Yang
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 8.829

Review 2.  Hypercholesterolemia in Cancer and in Anorexia Nervosa: A Hypothesis for a Crosstalk.

Authors:  Giulia Gizzi; Samuela Cataldi; Claudia Mazzeschi; Elisa Delvecchio; Maria Rachele Ceccarini; Michela Codini; Elisabetta Albi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  The neural correlates of the face attractiveness aftereffect: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study.

Authors:  Genyue Fu; Catherine J Mondloch; Xiao Pan Ding; Lindsey A Short; Liping Sun; Kang Lee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Visual adaptation selective for individual limbs reveals hierarchical human body representation.

Authors:  Alexander Bratch; Yixiong Chen; Stephen A Engel; Daniel J Kersten
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Body Image Distortion and Exposure to Extreme Body Types: Contingent Adaptation and Cross Adaptation for Self and Other.

Authors:  Kevin R Brooks; Jonathan M Mond; Richard J Stevenson; Ian D Stephen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 6.  Targeting Neural Endophenotypes of Eating Disorders with Non-invasive Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Katharine A Dunlop; Blake Woodside; Jonathan Downar
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Past visual experiences weigh in on body size estimation.

Authors:  Joanna Alexi; Dominique Cleary; Kendra Dommisse; Romina Palermo; Nadine Kloth; David Burr; Jason Bell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Independent Aftereffects of Fat and Muscle: Implications for neural encoding, body space representation, and body image disturbance.

Authors:  Daniel Sturman; Ian D Stephen; Jonathan Mond; Richard J Stevenson; Kevin R Brooks
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Visual adaptation to thin and fat bodies transfers across identity.

Authors:  Dennis Hummel; Anne K Rudolf; Karl-Heinz Untch; Ralph Grabhorn; Harald M Mohr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of exposure to bodies of different sizes on perception of and satisfaction with own body size: two randomized studies.

Authors:  Helen Bould; Rebecca Carnegie; Heather Allward; Emily Bacon; Emily Lambe; Megan Sapseid; Katherine S Button; Glyn Lewis; Andy Skinner; Matthew R Broome; Rebecca Park; Catherine J Harmer; Ian S Penton-Voak; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.