Literature DB >> 22807296

Chromatic pupillometry dissects function of the three different light-sensitive retinal cell populations in RPE65 deficiency.

Birgit Lorenz1, Elisabeth Strohmayr, Steffen Zahn, Christoph Friedburg, Martin Kramer, Markus Preising, Knut Stieger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to objectively characterize the function of rods, cones, and intrinsic photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) in patients with RPE65 mutations by using two published protocols for chromatic pupillometry, and to correlate the data with the clinical phenotype.
METHODS: The study group comprised 11 patients with RPE65 mutations, and for control purposes, 32 healthy probands and 2 achromats. A custom-made binocular chromatic pupillometer (Bino I) connected to a ColorDome Ganzfeld stimulator was used to assess changes in pupil diameter in response to red (640 nm) and blue (462 nm) light stimuli. Light intensities, stimulus duration, and background varied depending on the protocol used. Results were compared to the clinical phenotype, that is, visual field (Goldmann perimetry), best corrected visual acuity, and full-field stimulus testing (FST).
RESULTS: No significant differences in any of the pupil response parameters were observed in intraday or intervisit variability tests. Pupil responses to rod-weighted stimulation were significantly diminished in all RPE65 patients. Pupil responses to cone-weighted stimuli differed among RPE65 patients and did not always correlate with residual visual field and cone sensitivity loss in FST. Pupil responses to ipRGC-weighted answers were slightly but significantly diminished, and the postillumination pupil response was significantly increased.
CONCLUSIONS: Chromatic pupillometry represents a highly sensitive and objective test to quantify the function of rods, cones, and ipRGCs in patients with RPE65 mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22807296     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-9974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  15 in total

1.  Dark adaptation-induced changes in rod, cone and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell (ipRGC) sensitivity differentially affect the pupil light response (PLR).

Authors:  Bin Wang; Chao Shen; Lei Zhang; Linsong Qi; Lu Yao; Jianzhang Chen; Guoqing Yang; Tao Chen; Zuoming Zhang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Variability and Errors of Manually Digitized Goldmann Visual Fields.

Authors:  Michael P Barry; Ava K Bittner; Liancheng Yang; Rebecca Marcus; Mian Haris Iftikhar; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Adaptation time, electroretinography, and pupillography in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Ken Asakawa; Akari Ito; Hinako Kobayashi; Aya Iwai; Chihiro Ito; Hitoshi Ishikawa
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 4.  Statement of the DOG, the RG, and the BVA on the therapeutic use of voretigene neparvovec (Luxturna™) in ophthalmology. English version : January 2019.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Reply: Pupil area and photopigment spectral sensitivity are relevant to study of migraine photophobia.

Authors:  Rami Burstein
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  The Melanopsin-Mediated Pupillary Light Response Is Not Changed in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  Shakoor Ba-Ali; Rigmor Højland Jensen; Line Sofie Larsen; Henrik Lund-Andersen; Steffen Hamann
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2017-08-18

7.  Transient pupillary light reflex in CEP290- or NPHP5-associated Leber congenital amaurosis: Latency as a potential outcome measure of cone function.

Authors:  Arun K Krishnan; Samuel G Jacobson; Alejandro J Roman; Bhavya S Iyer; Alexandra V Garafalo; Elise Héon; Artur V Cideciyan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Blurring the boundaries of vision: novel functions of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Anna Matynia
Journal:  J Exp Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-03

9.  Immuno-histochemical analysis of rod and cone reaction to RPE65 deficiency in the inferior and superior canine retina.

Authors:  Daniela Klein; Alexandra Mendes-Madeira; Patrice Schlegel; Fabienne Rolling; Birgit Lorenz; Silke Haverkamp; Knut Stieger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Chromatic Pupilloperimetry Measures Correlate With Visual Acuity and Visual Field Defects in Retinitis Pigmentosa Patients.

Authors:  Ifat Sher; Yisroel Tucker; Maya Gurevich; Amit Hamburg; Ettel Bubis; Jonathan Kfir; Shlomit Zorani; Estela Derazne; Alon Skaat; Ygal Rotenstreich
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.