Literature DB >> 22807278

Microarray with micro- and nano-topographies enables identification of the optimal topography for directing the differentiation of primary murine neural progenitor cells.

Aung Aung Kywe Moe1, Mona Suryana, Guillaume Marcy, Sandy Keat Lim, Soneela Ankam, Jerome Zhi Wen Goh, Jing Jin, Benjamin Kim Kiat Teo, Jaslyn Bee Khuan Law, Hong Yee Low, Eyleen L K Goh, Michael P Sheetz, Evelyn K F Yim.   

Abstract

During development and tissue repair, progenitor cells are guided by both biochemical and biophysical cues of their microenvironment, including topographical signals. The topographical cues have been shown to play an important role in controlling the fate of cells. Systematic investigation of topographical structures with different geometries and sizes under the identical experimental conditions on the same chip will enhance the understanding of the role of shape and size in cell-topography interactions. A simple customizable multi-architecture chip (MARC) array is therefore developed to incorporate, on a single chip, distinct topographies of various architectural complexities, including both isotropic and anisotropic features, in nano- to micrometer dimensions, with different aspect ratios and hierarchical structures. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) replicas of MARC are used to investigate the influence of different geometries and sizes in neural differentiation of primary murine neural progenitor cells (mNPCs). Anisotropic gratings (2 μm gratings, 250 nm gratings) and isotropic 1 μm pillars significantly promote differentiation of mNPCs into neurons, as indicated by expression of β-III-tubulin (59%, 58%, and 58%, respectively, compared to 30% on the control). In contrast, glial differentiation is enhanced on isotropic 2 μm holes and 1 μm pillars. These results illustrate that anisotropic topographies enhance neuronal differentiation while isotropic topographies enhance glial differentiation on the same chip under the same conditions. MARC enables simultaneous cost-effective investigation of multiple topographies, allowing efficient optimization of topographical and biochemical cues to modulate cell differentiation.
Copyright © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22807278     DOI: 10.1002/smll.201200490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Small        ISSN: 1613-6810            Impact factor:   13.281


  25 in total

Review 1.  High throughput screening to investigate the interaction of stem cells with their extracellular microenvironment.

Authors:  Soneela Ankam; Benjamin K K Teo; Marek Kukumberg; Evelyn K F Yim
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 2.  The influence of microenvironment and extracellular matrix molecules in driving neural stem cell fate within biomaterials.

Authors:  Thomas Wilems; Sangamithra Vardhan; Siliang Wu; Shelly Sakiyama-Elbert
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Expanding Nanopatterned Substrates Using Stitch Technique for Nanotopographical Modulation of Cell Behavior.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Kam W Leong; Yong Yang
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 4.  Topography design concept of a tissue engineering scaffold for controlling cell function and fate through actin cytoskeletal modulation.

Authors:  Hiromi Miyoshi; Taiji Adachi
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 6.389

5.  Functional differences between healthy and diabetic endothelial cells on topographical cues.

Authors:  Marie F A Cutiongco; Bryan M X Chua; Dawn J H Neo; Muhammad Rizwan; Evelyn K F Yim
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Hierarchical Ordered Assembly of Genetically Modifiable Viruses into Nanoridge-in-Microridge Structures.

Authors:  Ningyun Zhou; Yan Li; Christian H Loveland; Megan J Wilson; Binrui Cao; Penghe Qiu; Mingying Yang; Chuanbin Mao
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 30.849

7.  Organizational metrics of interchromatin speckle factor domains: integrative classifier for stem cell adhesion & lineage signaling.

Authors:  Sebastián L Vega; Anandika Dhaliwal; Varun Arvind; Parth J Patel; Nick R M Beijer; Jan de Boer; N Sanjeeva Murthy; Joachim Kohn; Prabhas V Moghe
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  High-Throughput Mechanobiology Screening Platform Using Micro- and Nanotopography.

Authors:  Junqiang Hu; Alexander A Gondarenko; Alex P Dang; Keenan T Bashour; Roddy S O'Connor; Sunwoo Lee; Anastasia Liapis; Saba Ghassemi; Michael C Milone; Michael P Sheetz; Michael L Dustin; Lance C Kam; James C Hone
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 11.189

Review 9.  The Influence of the Surface Topographical Cues of Biomaterials on Nerve Cells in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Review.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Jiawei Xu; Linliang Wu; Tiantian Zheng; Qi Han; Yunyun Liang; Liling Zhang; Guicai Li; Yumin Yang
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 10.  Biomaterials and engineered microenvironments to control YAP/TAZ-dependent cell behaviour.

Authors:  Giovanna Brusatin; Tito Panciera; Alessandro Gandin; Anna Citron; Stefano Piccolo
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 43.841

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.