Literature DB >> 22807244

Clinical Outcomes in Measurement-based Treatment (Comet): a trial of depression monitoring and feedback to primary care physicians.

Albert S Yeung1, Yonghua Jing, Susan K Brenneman, Trina E Chang, Lee Baer, Tony Hebden, Iftekhar Kalsekar, Robert D McQuade, Jonathan Kurlander, Jean Siebenaler, Maurizio Fava.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of effective treatments for depression, many patients under the care of primary care physicians do not achieve remission. Clinical Outcomes in Measurement-based Treatment (COMET) was designed to assess whether communicating patient-reported depression symptom severity to primary care physicians affects patient outcomes at 6 months.
METHODS: Nine hundred fifteen patients (intervention: n = 503; control: n = 412) diagnosed with major depressive disorder were enrolled in a prospective trial in which physician practice sites were assigned to either the intervention or control study arm. Only patients who were prescribed an antidepressant by their physician were eligible, but medication type was independent of the study protocol. Intervention-arm physicians received monthly updates on their patients' depression severity, which was determined with the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) administered during telephone interviews. Remission was defined as a PHQ-9 score <5 at 6 months; response was defined as a score reduction ≥50%.
RESULTS: Among patients with baseline PHQ-9 score ≥5, 45.0% achieved remission (46.7% intervention versus 42.8% control) and 63.9% responded (67.0% intervention versus 59.7% control) at 6 months. After adjusting for baseline demographic and clinical variables, odds of remission (odds ratio [OR], 1.59 [95% CI, 1.07-2.37]) or response (OR, 2.02 [95% CI, 1.36-3.02]) were significantly greater for the intervention group than for control patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that regular patient symptom monitoring with feedback to physicians improved outcomes of depression treatment in the primary care setting. Determining reasons for the high observed nonremission rates requires further investigation.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22807244     DOI: 10.1002/da.21983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Depress Anxiety        ISSN: 1091-4269            Impact factor:   6.505


  17 in total

1.  Use of PHQ-9 scores to guide treatment decisions in primary care.

Authors:  Tony Kendrick; Paul Little
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  STAR*D and Measurement-Based Care for Depression: Don't Toss Out the Baby!

Authors:  Raymond W Lam; Sidney H Kennedy
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.356

Review 3.  Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 1. Disease Burden and Principles of Care.

Authors:  Raymond W Lam; Diane McIntosh; JianLi Wang; Murray W Enns; Theo Kolivakis; Erin E Michalak; Jitender Sareen; Wei-Yi Song; Sidney H Kennedy; Glenda M MacQueen; Roumen V Milev; Sagar V Parikh; Arun V Ravindran
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.356

Review 4.  Furthering the reliable and valid measurement of mental health screening, diagnoses, treatment and outcomes through health information technology.

Authors:  Jessica E Haberer; Tom Trabin; Michael Klinkman
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 3.238

5.  Acceptance-based Behavior Therapy for Depression With Psychosis: Results From a Pilot Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Brandon A Gaudiano; Andrew M Busch; Susan J Wenze; Kathryn Nowlan; Gary Epstein-Lubow; Ivan W Miller
Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.325

6.  Adjunctive psychosocial intervention following Hospital discharge for Patients with bipolar disorder and comorbid substance use: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Susan J Wenze; Brandon A Gaudiano; Lauren M Weinstock; Katherine M Tezanos; Ivan W Miller
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.222

7.  The clinical characterization of the adult patient with depression aimed at personalization of management.

Authors:  Mario Maj; Dan J Stein; Gordon Parker; Mark Zimmerman; Giovanni A Fava; Marc De Hert; Koen Demyttenaere; Roger S McIntyre; Thomas Widiger; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 8.  Deconstructing Chronic Low Back Pain in the Older Adult: Step by Step Evidence and Expert-Based Recommendations for Evaluation and Treatment: Part IV: Depression.

Authors:  Joseph A Carley; Jordan F Karp; Angela Gentili; Zachary A Marcum; M Carrington Reid; Eric Rodriguez; Michelle I Rossi; Joseph Shega; Stephen Thielke; Debra K Weiner
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 9.  Assessing depression severity using the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework depression indicators: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Shaw; Daniel Sutcliffe; Terence Lacey; Tim Stokes
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Client feedback in psychological therapy for children and adolescents with mental health problems.

Authors:  Hanna Bergman; Hege Kornør; Adriani Nikolakopoulou; Ketil Hanssen-Bauer; Karla Soares-Weiser; Thomas K Tollefsen; Arild Bjørndal
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.