Literature DB >> 22806973

Different antigen presentation tendencies of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-induced bone marrow-derived macrophages and peritoneal macrophages.

Maozhi Hu1, Zhiming Pan, Yun Yang, Chuang Meng, Shizhong Geng, Meng You, Xinan Jiao.   

Abstract

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-induced bone marrow-derived cells (BMCs) and primary peritoneal exudate cells (PECs) are usually used for antigen presentation in in vitro experiments. In order to expound their tendency for uptake and antigen presentation, we compared differences in the degree of phagocytosis, the expression of co-stimulatory molecules, and the activation of T lymphocytes between these two cell types. These assays used the F4/80 marker expression, as it is the general marker for macrophages. The BMC population was found to contain both F4/80(bright) and F4/80(dim) subtypes, while PECs were mainly composed of the F4/80(bright) subtype. Expression levels of cell surface co-stimulatory molecules, CD80, CD86, CD54, and CD40, were significantly higher for F4/80(+)BMCs than F4/80(+)PECs. Their expressions were further upregulated for F4/80(+)BMCs than for F4/80(+)PECs after stimulation with flagellin. F4/80(+)BMCs had a weaker ability to phagocytize microbeads than F4/80(+)PECs (P < 0.05), and we determined no relationship between F4/80 expression and phagocytosis. T lymphocytes were activated more efficiently after incubation with BMCs pulsed with flagellin than with pulsed PECs. In this study, F4/80(+)BMCs and F4/80(+)PECs represent the bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) and peritoneal macrophages (PMs), respectively. These results indicate that PMs showed greater potential for phagocytosis, whereas GM-CSF-induced BMMs showed a tendency toward antigen presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22806973     DOI: 10.1007/s11626-012-9535-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim        ISSN: 1071-2690            Impact factor:   2.416


  23 in total

1.  The macrophage heterogeneity: difference between mouse peritoneal exudate and splenic F4/80+ macrophages.

Authors:  Guangwei Liu; Xue-Pei Xia; Shou-Liang Gong; Yong Zhao
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 2.  Adaptations of intestinal macrophages to an antigen-rich environment.

Authors:  Mirjam Schenk; Christoph Mueller
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 11.130

3.  IRF5 promotes inflammatory macrophage polarization and TH1-TH17 responses.

Authors:  Thomas Krausgruber; Katrina Blazek; Tim Smallie; Saba Alzabin; Helen Lockstone; Natasha Sahgal; Tracy Hussell; Marc Feldmann; Irina A Udalova
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2011-01-16       Impact factor: 25.606

4.  Cytoplasmic flagellin activates caspase-1 and secretion of interleukin 1beta via Ipaf.

Authors:  Edward A Miao; Celia M Alpuche-Aranda; Monica Dors; April E Clark; Martin W Bader; Samuel I Miller; Alan Aderem
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2006-04-30       Impact factor: 25.606

5.  Relative efficacy of uptake and presentation of Mycobacterium bovis BCG antigens by type I mouse lung epithelial cells and peritoneal macrophages.

Authors:  Mandavi Kumari; Rajiv K Saxena
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Characterization of two F4/80-positive Kupffer cell subsets by their function and phenotype in mice.

Authors:  Manabu Kinoshita; Takefumi Uchida; Atsushi Sato; Masahiro Nakashima; Hiroyuki Nakashima; Satoshi Shono; Yoshiko Habu; Hiromi Miyazaki; Sadayuki Hiroi; Shuhji Seki
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 25.083

7.  In vivo priming heterophil innate immune functions and increasing resistance to Salmonella enteritidis infection in neonatal chickens by immune stimulatory CpG oligodeoxynucleotides.

Authors:  Haiqi He; Kenneth J Genovese; Christina L Swaggerty; David J Nisbet; Michael H Kogut
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2007-03-18       Impact factor: 2.046

8.  Small interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery into murine bone marrow-derived macrophages by electroporation.

Authors:  Melanie Wiese; Kirstin Castiglione; Michael Hensel; Ulrike Schleicher; Christian Bogdan; Jonathan Jantsch
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Analysis of sialoadhesin expression on mouse alveolar macrophages.

Authors:  Julie Ducreux; Paul R Crocker; Rita Vanbever
Journal:  Immunol Lett       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 3.685

10.  Cytokine production by M-CSF- and GM-CSF-induced mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages upon coculturing with late apoptotic cells.

Authors:  Takahiro Yamazaki; Kisaburo Nagata; Yoshiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Cell Immunol       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 4.868

View more
  3 in total

1.  Responses of macrophages against Salmonella infection compared with phagocytosis.

Authors:  Maozhi Hu; Yun Yang; Chuang Meng; Zhiming Pan; Xinan Jiao
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.416

2.  Bone marrow-derived and peritoneal macrophages have different inflammatory response to oxLDL and M1/M2 marker expression - implications for atherosclerosis research.

Authors:  Line S Bisgaard; Christina K Mogensen; Alexander Rosendahl; Helena Cucak; Lars Bo Nielsen; Salka E Rasmussen; Tanja X Pedersen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Immunization with recombinant Salmonella expressing SspH2-EscI protects mice against wild type Salmonella infection.

Authors:  Maozhi Hu; Weixin Zhao; Hongying Li; Jie Gu; Qiuxiang Yan; Xiaohui Zhou; Zhiming Pan; Guiyou Cui; Xinan Jiao
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.741

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.