Literature DB >> 22806519

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: outcomes from 224 colonic resections performed at a single center using SILS.

Boris Vestweber1, Thomas Galetin, Kathrin Lammerting, Claudia Paul, Jeanette Giehl, Eberhard Straub, Bodo Kaldowski, Angelika Alfes, Karl-Heinz Vestweber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Compared with single-incision laparoscopy, multiport laparoscopy is associated with greater risk of postoperative wound pain, infection, incisional hernias, and suboptimal cosmetic outcomes. The feasibility of minimally invasive single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for colorectal procedures is well-established, but outcome data remain limited.
METHODS: Patients with benign diverticular disease, Crohn's disease, or ulcerative colitis admitted to Klinikum Leverkusen, Germany, for colonic resection between July 2009 and March 2011 (n = 224) underwent single-incision laparoscopic surgery using the SILS port system. Surgeons had ≥7 years' experience in laparoscopic colon surgery but no SILS experience. Patient demographic and clinical data were collected prospectively. Pain was evaluated by using a visual analog scale (0-10). Data were analyzed by using the SPSS PASW Statistics 18 database.
RESULTS: The majority of patients underwent sigmoid colectomy with high anterior resection (AR) or left hemicolectomy (n = 150) for diverticulitis. Our conversion rate to open surgery was 6.3 %, half in patients undergoing sigmoid colectomy with high AR or left hemicolectomy, 95 % of whom had diverticulitis. Mean operating time was 166 ± 74 (range, 40-441) min in the overall population, with shorter times for single-port transanal tumor resection (SPTTR; 89 ± 51 min; range, 40-153 min) and longer times for proctocolectomy (325 min; range, 110-441 min). Mean hospital stay was approximately 10 days, longer after abdominoperineal rectal resection or proctocolectomy (12-16 days). Most complications occurred following sigmoid colectomy with high AR or left hemicolectomy [19/25 (76 %) of early and 4/5 (80 %) of late complications, respectively]. Pain was <4 on a scale of 0-10 in all cases on postoperative day 1, and typically decreased during the next 2 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the feasibility and tolerability of colorectal surgery, conducted by experienced laparoscopic surgeons without specific training in use of the SILS port.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22806519     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2454-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  27 in total

1.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery is feasible in complex colorectal resections and could enable day case colectomy.

Authors:  K J Gash; A C Goede; W Chambers; G L Greenslade; A R Dixon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jun Ma; Maria A Cassera; Georg O Spaun; Chet W Hammill; Paul D Hansen; Shaghayegh Aliabadi-Wahle
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Evaluation of current devices in single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a preliminary experience in 32 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Min-Hoe Chew; Mark Te-Ching Wong; Bernard Yon-Kuei Lim; Kheng-Hong Ng; Kong-Weng Eu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Long-term outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Nicolò Pecorelli; Matteo Frasson; Andrea Vignali; Walter Zuliani; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2011-03-15

5.  Laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: a prospective cost analysis.

Authors:  H M Dowson; H Gage; D Jackson; Y Qiao; P Williams; T A Rockall
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan-Ming Zhou; Lu-Peng Wu; Yan-Fang Zhao; Dong-Hui Xu; Bin Li
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is associated with a higher intraoperative complication rate than open surgery.

Authors:  Tarik Sammour; Arman Kahokehr; Sanket Srinivasa; Ian P Bissett; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a promising approach to sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.

Authors:  Boris Vestweber; Angelika Alfes; Claudia Paul; Franz Haaf; Karl-Heinz Vestweber
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  A systematic review of postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  B F Levy; H S Tilney; H M P Dowson; T A Rockall
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 10.  Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Esther Kuhry; Wolfgang Schwenk; Robin Gaupset; Ulla Romild; Jaap Bonjer
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 12.111

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Short-Term Outcomes of Single-Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Diseases: Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Prospective Evidence.

Authors:  Hui-Juan Li; Lei Huang; Tuan-Jie Li; Jing Su; Ling-Rong Peng; Wei Liu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for diverticulitis in overweight patients.

Authors:  Andreas D Rink; Boris Vestweber; Jasmina Hahn; Angelika Alfes; Claudia Paul; Karl-Heinz Vestweber
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease before the era of biologics.

Authors:  Andreas D Rink; Ivo R Fischer; Boris Vestweber; Karl-Heinz Vestweber
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Single-incision (with multi-input single-port) laparoscopic colorectal procedures: Early results.

Authors:  Metin Ertem; Hakan Gök; Emel Özveri
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2013-09-01

Review 5.  New trends in colorectal surgery: single port and natural orifice techniques.

Authors:  Ronald Daher; Elie Chouillard; Yves Panis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic colorectal surgery-systematic review and pooled analysis.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Tom Wiggins; Marta Penna; Paraskevas Paraskeva
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Single-port laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease: experiences with more than 300 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Boris Vestweber; Karl-Heinz Vestweber; Claudia Paul; Andreas D Rink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Transanal natural orifice specimen extraction for laparoscopic anterior resection in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Fang-Hai Han; Li-Xin Hua; Zhi Zhao; Jian-Hai Wu; Wen-Hua Zhan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  [Transanal extraction vs. minilaparotomy : For laparoendoscopic left-sided colon resection].

Authors:  A C Brockhaus; D Politt; C Lindlohr; S Saad
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Single-Site Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Provides Similar Clinical Outcomes Compared With Standard Laparoscopic Surgery: An Analysis of 626 Patients.

Authors:  William Sangster; Evangelos Messaris; Arthur S Berg; David B Stewart
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.585

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.