Literature DB >> 22806244

Alignment of electronic energy levels at electrochemical interfaces.

Jun Cheng1, Michiel Sprik.   

Abstract

The position of electronic energy levels in a phase depends on the surface potentials at its boundaries. Bringing two phases in contact at an interface will alter the surface potentials shifting the energy levels relative to each other. Calculating such shifts for electrochemical interfaces requires a combination of methods from computational surface science and physical chemistry. The problem is closely related to the computation of potentials of electrochemically inactive electrodes. These so-called ideally polarizable interfaces are impossible to cross for electrons. In this perspective we review two density functional theory based methods that have been developed for this purpose, the workfunction method and the hydrogen insertion method. The key expressions of the two methods are derived from the formal theory of absolute electrode potentials. As an illustration of the workfunction method we review the computation of the potential of zero charge of the Pt(111)-water interface as recently published by a number of groups. The example of the hydrogen insertion method is from our own work on the rutile TiO(2)(110)-water interface at the point of zero proton charge. The calculations are summarized in level diagrams aligning the electronic energy levels of the solid electrode (Fermi level of the metal, valence band maximum and conduction band minimum of the semiconductor) to the band edges of liquid water and the standard potential for the reduction of the hydroxyl radical. All potentials are calculated at the same level of density functional theory using the standard hydrogen electrode as common energy reference. Comparison to experiment identifies the treatment of the valence band of water as a potentially dangerous source of error for application to electrocatalysis and photocatalysis.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22806244     DOI: 10.1039/c2cp41652b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys        ISSN: 1463-9076            Impact factor:   3.676


  9 in total

Review 1.  Implicit Solvation Methods for Catalysis at Electrified Interfaces.

Authors:  Stefan Ringe; Nicolas G Hörmann; Harald Oberhofer; Karsten Reuter
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 72.087

2.  Variation in Surface Ionization Potentials of Pristine and Hydrated BiVO4.

Authors:  Rachel Crespo-Otero; Aron Walsh
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 6.475

3.  An innovative concept of use of redox-active electrolyte in asymmetric capacitor based on MWCNTs/MnO2 and Fe2O3 thin films.

Authors:  Nilesh R Chodankar; Deepak P Dubal; Abhishek C Lokhande; Amar M Patil; Jin H Kim; Chandrakant D Lokhande
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Bias-dependent local structure of water molecules at a metallic interface.

Authors:  Luana S Pedroza; Pedro Brandimarte; Alexandre Reily Rocha; M-V Fernández-Serra
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 9.825

5.  Understanding the apparent fractional charge of protons in the aqueous electrochemical double layer.

Authors:  Leanne D Chen; Michal Bajdich; J Mark P Martirez; Caroline M Krauter; Joseph A Gauthier; Emily A Carter; Alan C Luntz; Karen Chan; Jens K Nørskov
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Correlating Orbital Composition and Activity of LaMnxNi1-xO3 Nanostructures toward Oxygen Electrocatalysis.

Authors:  Mohammed A Alkhalifah; Benjamin Howchen; Joseph Staddon; Veronica Celorrio; Devendra Tiwari; David J Fermin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 16.383

7.  Double layer effects in a model of proton discharge on charged electrodes.

Authors:  Johannes Wiebe; Eckhard Spohr
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.649

8.  Electron affinity of liquid water.

Authors:  Alex P Gaiduk; Tuan Anh Pham; Marco Govoni; Francesco Paesani; Giulia Galli
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Adiabatic versus non-adiabatic electron transfer at 2D electrode materials.

Authors:  Dan-Qing Liu; Minkyung Kang; David Perry; Chang-Hui Chen; Geoff West; Xue Xia; Shayantan Chaudhuri; Zachary P L Laker; Neil R Wilson; Gabriel N Meloni; Marko M Melander; Reinhard J Maurer; Patrick R Unwin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.