Literature DB >> 22805186

Percutaneous core biopsy of small renal mass lesions: a diagnostic tool to better stratify patients for surgical intervention.

Stuart R Menogue1, Beverley A O'Brien, Alexandra L Brown, Ronald J Cohen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To further validate the safety and diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous core biopsy in small renal masses ([SRMs]≤4 cm) in response to the rising prevalence of renal 'incidentalomas'. To determine the value of percutaneous core biopsy in its ability to influence the choice of intervention or surveillance for the management of SRMs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected data on the incidence of benign, malignant and non-diagnostic samples from 268 SRM (clinical T1a) biopsies performed at our institution between 1998 and 2009. The diagnostic accuracy of biopsy in small renal lesions was examined in cases proceeding to nephrectomy. Follow-up on the remaining non-surgical cases was performed.
RESULTS: SRMs (≤4 cm, clinical T1a) constituted 59% of all renal lesions diagnosed; 80% of these biopsies were diagnostic and 20% were non-diagnostic. Of the diagnostic samples, 74% were malignant and 26% were benign. Thirty-three percent (17 of the initial 52) non-diagnostic samples underwent re-biopsy, with 94% yielding a histological diagnosis on repeat sampling. Fifty-eight percent of our diagnostic masses underwent nephrectomy, returning a renal biopsy accuracy rate of 100% for identifying lesions as benign or malignant. Of the 98 observed masses, 49% were benign, 28% malignant and 23% were non-diagnostic. In 63% of these cases, size remained stable in the follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous core biopsy continues to provide an accurate and safe tool for preoperative tissue diagnosis of SRMs and should be offered to patients before considering surgical intervention. With regard to both benign and malignant T1a renal lesions, in select patient groups, those electing to undergo observation may expect favourable short- to medium-term outcomes.
© 2012 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2012 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22805186     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11384.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  23 in total

1.  Assessment of multiphasic contrast-enhanced MR textures in differentiating small renal mass subtypes.

Authors:  Uyen N Hoang; S Mojdeh Mirmomen; Osorio Meirelles; Jianhua Yao; Maria Merino; Adam Metwalli; W Marston Linehan; Ashkan A Malayeri
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-12

2.  Identifying the use and barriers to the adoption of renal tumour biopsy in the management of small renal masses.

Authors:  Patrick O Richard; Lisa Martin; Luke T Lavallée; Philippe D Violette; Maria Komisarenko; Andrew J Evans; Kunal Jain; Michael A S Jewett; Antonio Finelli
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Diagnostic Accuracy and Risks of Biopsy in the Diagnosis of a Renal Mass Suspicious for Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Hiten D Patel; Michael H Johnson; Phillip M Pierorazio; Stephen M Sozio; Ritu Sharma; Emmanuel Iyoha; Eric B Bass; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Should Small Renal Masses Be Biopsied?

Authors:  Ricardo R N Leão; Ardalan E Ahmad; Patrick O Richard
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Evaluation of Urine Aquaporin-1 and Perilipin-2 Concentrations as Biomarkers to Screen for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jeremiah J Morrissey; Vincent M Mellnick; Jingqin Luo; Marilyn J Siegel; R Sherburne Figenshau; Sam Bhayani; Evan D Kharasch
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 31.777

6.  Surgical management of renal cell carcinoma: Canadian Kidney Cancer Forum Consensus.

Authors:  Ricardo A Rendon; Anil Kapoor; Rodney Breau; Michael Leveridge; Andrew Feifer; Peter C Black; Alan So
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Impact of tumor histology and grade on treatment success of percutaneous renal cryoablation.

Authors:  Alp Tuna Beksac; Gerant Rivera-Sanfeliz; Catherine A Dufour; Unwanaobong Nseyo; Zachary Hamilton; Sean W Berquist; Abd-elRahman Hassan; Omer A Raheem; Song Wang; Robert W Wake; Robert E Gold; Ithaar H Derweesh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Utilization of renal mass biopsy in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  John T Leppert; Janet Hanley; Todd H Wagner; Benjamin I Chung; Sandy Srinivas; Glenn M Chertow; James D Brooks; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  MicroRNA-15a expression measured in urine samples as a potential biomarker of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yulian Mytsyk; Victor Dosenko; Yuriy Borys; Askold Kucher; Katarina Gazdikova; Dietrich Busselberg; Martin Caprnda; Peter Kruzliak; Ammad Ahmad Farooqi; Manyuk Lubov
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 10.  Evaluation of renal masses with contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  S Houtzager; H Wijkstra; J J M C H de la Rosette; M P Laguna
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.