Literature DB >> 22804962

The rise and fall of CRISPRs--dynamics of spacer acquisition and loss.

Edze R Westra1, Stan J J Brouns.   

Abstract

Bacteria and Archaea are continuously exposed to mobile genetic elements (MGE), such as viruses and plasmids. MGEs may provide a selective advantage, may be neutral or may cause cell damage. To protect against invading DNA, prokaryotes utilize a number of defence systems, including the CRISPR/Cas system. CRISPR/Cas systems rely on integration of invader sequences (spacers) into CRISPR loci that act as a genetic memory of past invasions. Processed CRISPR transcripts are utilized as guides by Cas proteins to cleave complementary invader nucleic acids. In this issue, two groups report on spacer acquisition and turnover dynamics of CRISPR loci in a thermoacidophilic archeon and a pathogenic bacterium. Erdmann and Garrett (2012) demonstrate that three of the six CRISPR loci of Sulfolobus solfataricus rapidly acquire new spacer sequences from a conjugative plasmid present in a virus mixture. Intriguingly, two distinct mechanisms of spacer integration are utilized: leader adjacent and internal CRISPR spacer acquisition. Lopez-Sanchez et al. (2012) studied the type II system of Streptococcus agalactiae and observe heterogeneity in the bacterial population. A fraction of the population lost one or more anti-mobilome spacer sequences during its cultivation, allowing the transfer of a MGE in this subpopulation and a rapid response to altering selection pressures.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22804962     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08170.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Microbiol        ISSN: 0950-382X            Impact factor:   3.501


  9 in total

1.  A genome-guided analysis of energy conservation in the thermophilic, cytochrome-free acetogenic bacterium Thermoanaerobacter kivui.

Authors:  Verena Hess; Anja Poehlein; Marie Charlotte Weghoff; Rolf Daniel; Volker Müller
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.969

2.  The CRISPR Spacer Space Is Dominated by Sequences from Species-Specific Mobilomes.

Authors:  Sergey A Shmakov; Vassilii Sitnik; Kira S Makarova; Yuri I Wolf; Konstantin V Severinov; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 7.867

Review 3.  Function and regulation of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) / CRISPR associated (Cas) systems.

Authors:  Corinna Richter; James T Chang; Peter C Fineran
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 5.048

4.  Genome-guided analysis of physiological and morphological traits of the fermentative acetate oxidizer Thermacetogenium phaeum.

Authors:  Dirk Oehler; Anja Poehlein; Andreas Leimbach; Nicolai Müller; Rolf Daniel; Gerhard Gottschalk; Bernhard Schink
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Type I-E CRISPR-cas systems discriminate target from non-target DNA through base pairing-independent PAM recognition.

Authors:  Edze R Westra; Ekaterina Semenova; Kirill A Datsenko; Ryan N Jackson; Blake Wiedenheft; Konstantin Severinov; Stan J J Brouns
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 6.  Alternative roles for CRISPR/Cas systems in bacterial pathogenesis.

Authors:  Timothy R Sampson; David S Weiss
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 6.823

7.  The tracrRNA and Cas9 families of type II CRISPR-Cas immunity systems.

Authors:  Krzysztof Chylinski; Anaïs Le Rhun; Emmanuelle Charpentier
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 4.652

8.  Protospacer recognition motifs: mixed identities and functional diversity.

Authors:  Shiraz A Shah; Susanne Erdmann; Francisco J M Mojica; Roger A Garrett
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 4.652

9.  CRISPR-Cas systems preferentially target the leading regions of MOBF conjugative plasmids.

Authors:  Edze R Westra; Raymond H J Staals; Gerrit Gort; Søren Høgh; Sarah Neumann; Fernando de la Cruz; Peter C Fineran; Stan J J Brouns
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.652

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.