Literature DB >> 22803016

Serial monitoring of the physiological effects of the standard Pico-Salax® regimen for colon cleansing in healthy volunteers.

Adam Rahman1, Stephen J Vanner, Adrian Baranchuk, Lawrence C Hookey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sodium picosulfatemagnesium oxidecitric acid (Pico-Salax, Ferring Inc, Canada) is used widely in Canada and other countries for colon cleansing before colonoscopy. It is a low-volume osmotic⁄stimulant agent with the potential to deplete intravascular volume and alter electrolyte balance, yet there are little data regarding its effects on these clinically important end points.
OBJECTIVE: To serially measure parameters of intravascular volume and electrolyte status in healthy volunteers over a 24 h period using the standard two-sachet dosing.
METHODS: Twenty volunteers were given one sachet of Pico-Salax at time 0 h and another sachet 5 h later, as per usual bowel cleansing protocol. Subjects were continually monitored during the first 12 h of the study with postural vital signs, serum electrolytes and electrocardiograms obtained at intervals throughout this initial period and again at 24 h postingestion.
RESULTS: No adverse events were reported nor were there any signs of intravascular volume depletion observed. There were decreases in potassium and calcium levels from baseline to 12 h, but these appeared minor and were corrected by 24 h. The proportions of patients with hypermagnesmia at 0 h, 5 h, 12 h and 24 h were 5%, 35%, 35% and 20%, respectively (P<0.05). However, the maximal values were only minimally elevated. Mean serum sodium, phosphate and creatinine levels remained within their respective reference ranges. There was a trend toward an increase in maximum corrected QT intervals from time 0 h (418 ms) to 5 h (430 ms) (P=0.06), but no significant change was seen subsequently at 12 h (419 ms). The subjects tolerated the medication well. The mean number of bowel movements per subject was 8.15 (range four to 15). Subjects consumed a mean (± SD) of 3.49±1.53 L of fluids during the observation period.
CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of individuals with hypokalemia, hypocalcemia and hypermagnesemia following two sachets of Pico-Salax is significant, but the magnitude of the changes was not clinically relevant in this relatively small group, and both calcium and potassium levels normalized at 24 h. Nonetheless, this could have implications in patients with pre-existing electrolyte abnormalities and the safety of dosing with more than two sachets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22803016      PMCID: PMC3395442          DOI: 10.1155/2012/757583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0835-7900            Impact factor:   3.522


  12 in total

Review 1.  Which is the optimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy - a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J J Y Tan; J J Tjandra
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 2.  The safety profile of oral sodium phosphate for colonic cleansing before colonoscopy in adults.

Authors:  Lawrence C Hookey; William T Depew; Stephen Vanner
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Recognizing the clinical contraindications to the use of oral sodium phosphate for colon cleansing: a case study.

Authors:  Lawrence C Hookey; Stephen Vanner
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.522

4.  Renal failure and nephrocalcinosis associated with oral sodium phosphate bowel cleansing: clinical patterns and renal biopsy findings.

Authors:  Gulfiliz Gonlusen; Hulya Akgun; Atilla Ertan; Juan Olivero; Luan D Truong
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 5.  Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  J Belsey; O Epstein; D Heresbach
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 8.171

6.  Meta-analysis and cost comparison of polyethylene glycol lavage versus sodium phosphate for colonoscopy preparation.

Authors:  C W Hsu; T F Imperiale
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  A randomized prospective trial comparing different regimens of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Alaa Rostom; Emilie Jolicoeur; Catherine Dubé; Sylvie Grégoire; Dilip Patel; Navaaz Saloojee; Catherine Lowe
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood; Maurits J Wiersema; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Pico-salax plus two-day bisacodyl is superior to pico-salax alone or oral sodium phosphate for colon cleansing before colonoscopy.

Authors:  Lawrence C Hookey; Stephen J Vanner
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Bowel preparation in CT colonography: electrolyte and renal function disturbances in the frail and elderly patient.

Authors:  Patrick Mc Laughlin; Joseph Eustace; Sean Mc Sweeney; Sebastian Mc Williams; Kevin O'Regan; Michael O'Connor; Denis Kelly; Michael M Maher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effectiveness of Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate (PICO) for Colonoscopy Preparation.

Authors:  Ki Hwan Song; Wu Seok Suh; Jin Sik Jeong; Dong Sik Kim; Sang Woo Kim; Dong Min Kwak; Jong Seong Hwang; Hyun Jin Kim; Man Woo Park; Min Chul Shim; Ja-Il Koo; Jae Hwang Kim; Dae Ho Shon
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2014-10-28

2.  Colonoscopy preparation-induced disorders in renal function and electrolytes.

Authors:  Matilda Florentin; George Liamis; Moses S Elisaf
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-05-06

3.  Frequency of hyponatremia caused by sodium picosulfate solution when used as a bowel cleansing agent for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Tazeen Rasheed; Haris Alvi; Majid Ahmed Shaikh; Faiza Sadaqat Ali; Bader Faiyaz Zuberi; Wara Subhan
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  Prospective, randomized comparison of same-day dose of 2 different bowel cleanser for afternoon colonoscopy: picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid versus polyethylene glycol.

Authors:  Tae-Geun Gweon; Sang Woo Kim; Yong-Sun Noh; Seawon Hwang; Na-Young Kim; Yoonbum Lee; Soon-Wook Lee; Sung Won Lee; Jong Yul Lee; Chul-Hyun Lim; Hyung Hun Kim; Jin Su Kim; Yu Kyung Cho; Jae Myung Park; In Seok Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Polyethylene glycol vs sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate for colonoscopy preparation.

Authors:  Kristian Leitao; Tore Grimstad; Michael Bretthauer; Øyvind Holme; Vemund Paulsen; Lars Karlsen; Kjetil Isaksen; Milada Cvancarova; Lars Aabakken
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2014-10-24

6.  Serum magnesium concentrations in patients receiving sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate bowel preparation: an assessment of renal function and electrocardiographic conduction.

Authors:  Gerald Bertiger; Edward Jones; David N Dahdal; Dennis C Marshall; Raymond E Joseph
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.