| Literature DB >> 22802770 |
Paweł Szewczyk1, Anna Zimny, Elżbieta Trypka, Renata Wojtyńska, Jerzy Leszek, Marek Sąsiadek.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pathological examinations and the increasingly popular diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) show that in Alzheimer's disease (AD), the pathology involves not only the cortical and hippocampal structures, but also the white matter of the brain. DTI is a well recognized technique for evaluation of the integrity of white matter fibers. The aim of this study was to assess with the use of DTI some selected brain tracts in patients with AD, as well as to analyze the severity and distribution of the identified changes. MATERIAL/Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; diffusion tensor imaging; fractional anisotropy; white matter
Year: 2010 PMID: 22802770 PMCID: PMC3389871
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pol J Radiol ISSN: 1733-134X
Demographic data and neuropsychological test results of the study groups. Mean values, standard deviation in parentheses.
| Number of patients | 35 | 15 |
| Age (years) | 71.6 (11.7) | 69.1 (8.0) |
| Sex F/M | 22/13 | 9/6 |
| MMSE | 17.6 (6.5) | 29.8 (0.4) |
| CDR | 1.7 (0.7) | 0 (0) |
AD – Alzheimer’s disease; CN – control group, MMSE – Mini-Mental State Examination; CDR – Clinical Dementia Rating.
Figure 1.Location of the regions of interest in the right (ROI 1) and left (ROI 2) middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP) on the color-coded FA map (A). Reading the FA values obtained for both MCPs from the FA map (B). Fiber tractography of the MCPs (C).
Figure 4.Location of the regions of interest in the right (ROI 11) and the left (ROI 12) superior longitudinal fascicle (SLF) on the color-coded FA map (A). Fiber tractography of both SLFs (B). Location of the regions of interest in the posterior right (ROI 13) and left (ROI 14) cingulum (CG) on the color-coded FA map (C). Fiber tractography of both cingula (D).
Summary of mean values for FA parameter of the white matter tracts in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and in control group (CN), and statistical significance of differences between groups. Mean values, standard deviation in parentheses.
| ROI 1 | MCP R | 0.738 (0.042) | 0.737 (0.036) | 0.97 |
| ROI 2 | MCP L | 0.739 (0.047) | 0.743 (0.038) | 0.78 |
| ROI 3 | ILF R | 0.552 (0.050) | 0.616 (0.050) | |
| ROI 4 | ILF L | 0.567 (0.049) | 0.613 (0.038) | |
| ROI 5 | IFO R | 0.549 (0.052) | 0.602 (0.049) | |
| ROI 6 | IFO L | 0.547 (0.048) | 0.588 (0.046) | |
| ROI 7 | GCC | 0.737 (0.068) | 0.784 (0.046) | |
| ROI 8 | SCC | 0.797 (0.058) | 0.849 (0.054) | |
| ROI 9 | PLIC R | 0.718 (0.044) | 0.704 (0.034) | 0.28 |
| ROI 10 | PLIC L | 0.711 (0.052) | 0.718 (0.036) | 0.63 |
| ROI 11 | SLF R | 0.597 (0.044) | 0.620 (0.048) | 0.1 |
| ROI 12 | SLF L | 0.579 (0.052) | 0.629 (0.039) | |
| ROI 13 | CG R | 0.552 (0.059) | 0.660 (0.051) | |
| ROI 14 | CG L | 0.568 (0.051) | 0.687 (0.042) |
Student’s t-test for independent samples, AD vs CN, statistical significances are bold typed. MCP – middle cerebellar peduncle; ILF – inferior longitudinal fasciculus; IFO – inferior frontooccipital fasciculus; GCC – genu of the corpus callosum; SCC – splenium of the corpus callosum; PLIC – posterior limb of internal capsule; SLF – superior longitudinal fasciculus; CG – cingulum.