Literature DB >> 22802018

Gene regulatory network of unfolded protein response genes in endoplasmic reticulum stress.

Sayuri Takayanagi1, Riga Fukuda, Yuuki Takeuchi, Sakiko Tsukada, Kenichi Yoshida.   

Abstract

In the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), secretory and membrane proteins are properly folded and modified, and the failure of these processes leads to ER stress. At the same time, unfolded protein response (UPR) genes are activated to maintain homeostasis. Despite the thorough characterization of the individual gene regulation of UPR genes to date, further investigation of the mutual regulation among UPR genes is required to understand the complex mechanism underlying the ER stress response. In this study, we aimed to reveal a gene regulatory network formed by UPR genes, including immunoglobulin heavy chain-binding protein (BiP), X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1), C/EBP [CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein]-homologous protein (CHOP), PKR-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), inositol-requiring 1 (IRE1), activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6), and ATF4. For this purpose, we focused on promoter-luciferase reporters for BiP, XBP1, and CHOP genes, which bear an ER stress response element (ERSE), and p5 × ATF6-GL3, which bears an unfolded protein response element (UPRE). We demonstrated that the luciferase activities of the BiP and CHOP promoters were upregulated by all the UPR genes, whereas those of the XBP1 promoter and p5 × ATF6-GL3 were upregulated by all the UPR genes except for BiP, CHOP, and ATF4 in HeLa cells. Therefore, an ERSE- and UPRE-centered gene regulatory network of UPR genes could be responsible for the robustness of the ER stress response. Finally, we revealed that BiP protein was degraded when cells were treated with DNA-damaging reagents, such as etoposide and doxorubicin; this finding suggests that the expression level of BiP is tightly regulated at the post-translational level, rather than at the transcriptional level, in the presence of DNA damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22802018      PMCID: PMC3508129          DOI: 10.1007/s12192-012-0351-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones        ISSN: 1355-8145            Impact factor:   3.667


  29 in total

1.  Interaction of ATF6 and serum response factor.

Authors:  C Zhu; F E Johansen; R Prywes
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Two distinct stress signaling pathways converge upon the CHOP promoter during the mammalian unfolded protein response.

Authors:  Yanjun Ma; Joseph W Brewer; J Alan Diehl; Linda M Hendershot
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-05-17       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  Sensing endoplasmic reticulum stress.

Authors:  Vipul M Parmar; Martin Schröder
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Activation of ATF6 and an ATF6 DNA binding site by the endoplasmic reticulum stress response.

Authors:  Y Wang; J Shen; N Arenzana; W Tirasophon; R J Kaufman; R Prywes
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  CHOP gene expression in response to endoplasmic-reticular stress requires NFY interaction with different domains of a conserved DNA-binding element.

Authors:  M Ubeda; J F Habener
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  XBP1 mRNA is induced by ATF6 and spliced by IRE1 in response to ER stress to produce a highly active transcription factor.

Authors:  H Yoshida; T Matsui; A Yamamoto; T Okada; K Mori
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-12-28       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  ATF6 as a transcription activator of the endoplasmic reticulum stress element: thapsigargin stress-induced changes and synergistic interactions with NF-Y and YY1.

Authors:  M Li; P Baumeister; B Roy; T Phan; D Foti; S Luo; A S Lee
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 8.  Roles of CHOP/GADD153 in endoplasmic reticulum stress.

Authors:  S Oyadomari; M Mori
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 15.828

9.  Induction of Grp78/BiP by translational block: activation of the Grp78 promoter by ATF4 through and upstream ATF/CRE site independent of the endoplasmic reticulum stress elements.

Authors:  Shengzhan Luo; Peter Baumeister; Shujie Yang; Steve F Abcouwer; Amy S Lee
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-07-18       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Requirement of tyrosine- and serine/threonine kinases in the transcriptional activation of the mammalian grp78/BiP promoter by thapsigargin.

Authors:  X Cao; Y Zhou; A S Lee
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-01-06       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  A molecular mechanism for glaucoma: endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response.

Authors:  Robert R H Anholt; Mary Anna Carbone
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 11.951

2.  TM7SF3, a novel p53-regulated homeostatic factor, attenuates cellular stress and the subsequent induction of the unfolded protein response.

Authors:  Roi Isaac; Ido Goldstein; Noa Furth; Neta Zilber; Sarina Streim; Sigalit Boura-Halfon; Eytan Elhanany; Varda Rotter; Moshe Oren; Yehiel Zick
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 15.828

3.  Detection of WIPI1 mRNA as an indicator of autophagosome formation.

Authors:  Satoshi Tsuyuki; Mei Takabayashi; Manami Kawazu; Kousei Kudo; Akari Watanabe; Yoshiki Nagata; Yusuke Kusama; Kenichi Yoshida
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 16.016

4.  MIST1 Links Secretion and Stress as both Target and Regulator of the Unfolded Protein Response.

Authors:  David A Hess; Katherine M Strelau; Anju Karki; Mei Jiang; Ana C Azevedo-Pouly; Ann-Hwee Lee; Tye G Deering; Chinh Q Hoang; Raymond J MacDonald; Stephen F Konieczny
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Transcription elongation factor ELL2 drives Ig secretory-specific mRNA production and the unfolded protein response.

Authors:  Kyung Soo Park; Ian Bayles; Alec Szlachta-McGinn; Joshua Paul; Julie Boiko; Patricia Santos; June Liu; Zhou Wang; Lisa Borghesi; Christine Milcarek
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Rotavirus Infection Alters Splicing of the Stress-Related Transcription Factor XBP1.

Authors:  Patrice Vende; Annie Charpilienne; Mariela Duarte; Matthieu Gratia; Cécile Laroche; Didier Poncet
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Legacy effect of high glucose on promoting survival of HCT116 colorectal cancer cells by reducing endoplasmic reticulum stress response.

Authors:  Heung Man Lee; Shao Chin Lee; Lan He; Alice Pik Shan Kong; Dandan Mao; Yong Hou; Arthur Chi Kong Chung; Gang Xu; Ronald Ching Wan Ma; Juliana Chung Ngor Chan
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 6.166

8.  Tauroursodeoxycholic acid alleviates secondary injury in the spinal cord via up-regulation of CIBZ gene.

Authors:  Zongmeng Zhang; Jie Chen; Fanghui Chen; Daolun Yu; Rui Li; Chenglong Lv; Haosen Wang; Honglin Li; Jun Li; Yafei Cai
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 3.667

9.  BIP and the unfolded protein response are important for potyvirus and potexvirus infection.

Authors:  Venura Herath; Mathieu Gayral; Rita K Miller; Jeanmarie Verchot
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2020-08-15

10.  Elevated systemic expression of ER stress related genes is associated with stress-related mental disorders in the Detroit Neighborhood Health Study.

Authors:  Lisa Nevell; Kezhong Zhang; Allison E Aiello; Karestan Koenen; Sandro Galea; Richelo Soliven; Chao Zhang; Derek E Wildman; Monica Uddin
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.905

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.