Literature DB >> 22801814

[Guidelines: reality and quality].

S Rogenhofer1, F Zengerling, M Schrader, S C Müller.   

Abstract

The aim of guidelines is to increase the quality of care in clinical practice. Any influence or financial support by the pharmaceutical industry must be excluded. In urology only two S3 guidelines have been published in German and all others are more or less recommendations (S1). The example of the second opinion project on testicular germ cell tumors shows that a reduction of recurrence, morbidity and mortality can be achieved by the consistent application of guidelines. Oncological guidelines are often focused on the unidirectional parameter overall survival but do not include other important aspects, such as long-term morbidity or quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22801814     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-012-2935-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation and adaptation of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Ian D Graham; Margaret B Harrison
Journal:  Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2005-07

2.  Canadian physicians' attitudes about and preferences regarding clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  R S Hayward; G H Guyatt; K A Moore; K A McKibbon; A O Carter
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The quality of medical evidence in hematology-oncology.

Authors:  B Djulbegovic; T P Loughran; C A Hornung; G Kloecker; E N Efthimiadis; T J Hadley; J Englert; M Hoskins; G H Goldsmith
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  [What is most important is what comes across : Urological guidelines from the target group's point of view].

Authors:  J Busch; C Röllig; L Weissbach; C Kempkensteffen; S Hinz; C Jahnke; M Schostak; M Lein; S Weikert; C Stephan; S Deger; G Ollenschläger; K Miller; M Schrader
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 0.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.