Literature DB >> 22801763

Anatomical comparison of minimally invasive nasal valve procedures.

David M Weeks1, David D Walker, Jay M Dutton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the quantitative effects of Z-plasty vs spreader grafts on nasal valve surface area.
METHODS: Eight fresh cadaver heads were used that provided 16 total nasal valve procedures. Surgical sides were randomized, and Z-plasty was performed on 8 valves and endonasal spreader grafts were performed on 8 valves. The minimal cross-sectional area at the level of the nasal valve was measured preoperatively and postoperatively using acoustic rhinometry. We then compared Z-plasty and spreader grafts using a Wilcoxon signed rank test.
RESULTS: The mean nasal surface area at the nasal valve before Z-plasty was 1.37 cm(2) (range, 0.39-2.25 cm(2)) and after Z-plasty was 1.95 cm(2) (range, 1.08-2.62 cm(2)). The mean surface area at the nasal valve before spreader grafts was 1.15 cm(2) (range, 0.75-1.48 cm(2)) and after spreader grafts was 1.48 cm(2) (0.95-1.95 cm(2)). This correlates with a mean increase in the nasal valve surface area of 65% when Z-plasty was performed (95% CI, 28%-88%; P = .007) and 31% when a spreader graft was performed (95% CI, 15%-54%; P = .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Z-plasty and spreader grafts were shown to increase nasal valve surface area. Z-plasty seems to increase nasal valve surface area more than spreader grafts.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22801763     DOI: 10.1001/archfacial.2012.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 1521-2491


  1 in total

1.  Nasal Valve Reconstruction Using a Titanium Implant: An Outcomes Study.

Authors:  Neal D Goldman; Richard Alexander; Laura F Sandoval; Steven R Feldman
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-03-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.