OBJECTIVE: To identify plasma biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD). DESIGN: Baseline plasma screening of 151 multiplexed analytes combined with targeted biomarker and clinical pathology data. SETTING: General community-based, prospective, longitudinal study of aging. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 754 healthy individuals serving as controls and 207 participants with AD from the Australian Imaging Biomarker and Lifestyle study (AIBL) cohort with identified biomarkers that were validated in 58 healthy controls and 112 individuals with AD from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort. RESULTS: A biomarker panel was identified that included markers significantly increased (cortisol, pancreatic polypeptide, insulinlike growth factor binding protein 2, β(2) microglobulin, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, carcinoembryonic antigen, matrix metalloprotein 2, CD40, macrophage inflammatory protein 1α, superoxide dismutase, and homocysteine) and decreased (apolipoprotein E, epidermal growth factor receptor, hemoglobin, calcium, zinc, interleukin 17, and albumin) in AD. Cross-validated accuracy measures from the AIBL cohort reached a mean (SD) of 85% (3.0%) for sensitivity and specificity and 93% (3.0) for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. A second validation using the ADNI cohort attained accuracy measures of 80% (3.0%) for sensitivity and specificity and 85% (3.0) for area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a panel of plasma biomarkers that distinguish individuals with AD from cognitively healthy control subjects with high sensitivity and specificity. Cross-validation within the AIBL cohort and further validation within the ADNI cohort provides strong evidence that the identified biomarkers are important for AD diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: To identify plasma biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD). DESIGN: Baseline plasma screening of 151 multiplexed analytes combined with targeted biomarker and clinical pathology data. SETTING: General community-based, prospective, longitudinal study of aging. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 754 healthy individuals serving as controls and 207 participants with AD from the Australian Imaging Biomarker and Lifestyle study (AIBL) cohort with identified biomarkers that were validated in 58 healthy controls and 112 individuals with AD from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort. RESULTS: A biomarker panel was identified that included markers significantly increased (cortisol, pancreatic polypeptide, insulinlike growth factor binding protein 2, β(2) microglobulin, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, carcinoembryonic antigen, matrix metalloprotein 2, CD40, macrophage inflammatory protein 1α, superoxide dismutase, and homocysteine) and decreased (apolipoprotein E, epidermal growth factor receptor, hemoglobin, calcium, zinc, interleukin 17, and albumin) in AD. Cross-validated accuracy measures from the AIBL cohort reached a mean (SD) of 85% (3.0%) for sensitivity and specificity and 93% (3.0) for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. A second validation using the ADNI cohort attained accuracy measures of 80% (3.0%) for sensitivity and specificity and 85% (3.0) for area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a panel of plasma biomarkers that distinguish individuals with AD from cognitively healthy control subjects with high sensitivity and specificity. Cross-validation within the AIBL cohort and further validation within the ADNI cohort provides strong evidence that the identified biomarkers are important for AD diagnosis.
Authors: V B Gupta; S M Laws; V L Villemagne; D Ames; A I Bush; K A Ellis; J K Lui; C Masters; C C Rowe; C Szoeke; K Taddei; R N Martins Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-03-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Anne M Fagan; Denise Head; Aarti R Shah; Daniel Marcus; Mark Mintun; John C Morris; David M Holtzman Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: C M Roe; A M Fagan; M M Williams; N Ghoshal; M Aeschleman; E A Grant; D S Marcus; M A Mintun; D M Holtzman; J C Morris Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Sid E O'Bryant; Guanghua Xiao; Robert Barber; Joan Reisch; Rachelle Doody; Thomas Fairchild; Perrie Adams; Steven Waring; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2010-09
Authors: Christoph Laske; Thomas Leyhe; Elke Stransky; Nadine Hoffmann; Andreas J Fallgatter; Janko Dietzsch Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2011-04-05 Impact factor: 5.176
Authors: Leslie M Shaw; Hugo Vanderstichele; Malgorzata Knapik-Czajka; Christopher M Clark; Paul S Aisen; Ronald C Petersen; Kaj Blennow; Holly Soares; Adam Simon; Piotr Lewczuk; Robert Dean; Eric Siemers; William Potter; Virginia M-Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: O L Lopez; L H Kuller; P D Mehta; J T Becker; H M Gach; R A Sweet; Y F Chang; R Tracy; S T DeKosky Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-04-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Mark T McAuley; Rose Anne Kenny; Thomas B L Kirkwood; Darren J Wilkinson; Janette J L Jones; Veronica M Miller Journal: BMC Neurosci Date: 2009-03-25 Impact factor: 3.288
Authors: E Cavedo; S Lista; Z Khachaturian; P Aisen; P Amouyel; K Herholz; C R Jack; R Sperling; J Cummings; K Blennow; S O'Bryant; G B Frisoni; A Khachaturian; M Kivipelto; W Klunk; K Broich; S Andrieu; M Thiebaut de Schotten; J-F Mangin; A A Lammertsma; K Johnson; S Teipel; A Drzezga; A Bokde; O Colliot; H Bakardjian; H Zetterberg; B Dubois; B Vellas; L S Schneider; H Hampel Journal: J Prev Alzheimers Dis Date: 2014-12
Authors: Jon B Toledo; Xiao Da; Michael W Weiner; David A Wolk; Sharon X Xie; Steven E Arnold; Christos Davatzikos; Leslie M Shaw; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2014-01-03 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Katalin Völgyi; Krisztina Háden; Viktor Kis; Péter Gulyássy; Kata Badics; Balázs András Györffy; Attila Simor; Zoltán Szabó; Tamás Janáky; László Drahos; Árpád Dobolyi; Botond Penke; Gábor Juhász; Katalin Adrienna Kékesi Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 5.590