AIM: It has been shown that pro-adrenomedullin is a good marker of the severity of septic shock but there are no data on the early changes in serum pro-adrenomedullin concentrations in patients with shock. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with septic shock and 21 healthy subjects studied as controls. Serum concentrations of pro-adrenomedullin, procalcitonin, ferritin, CRP and IL-6 were determined in all subjects at the initial observation. Patients with septic shock were also studied after 24 and 48 hours. RESULTS: The concentrations of the acute phase proteins were significantly higher in patients with septic shock than in the control subjects during the entire study period (P<0.001). Only procalcitonin significantly decreased on the third day of observation with respect to both the first day (P=0.002) and the second day (P=0.006). Proadrenomedullin (P=0.017) and IL-6 (P=0.001) showed an AUC significantly different from the null hypothesis in differentiating the patients who survived and those who did not. The sensitivity and specificity of pro-adrenomedullin in the assessment of death were 71.4% and 72.7%, respectively, while IL-6 had a sensitivity of 92.9% and a specificity of 60.6%. CONCLUSION: Proadrenomedullin is a reliable prognostic marker in patients with shock; further studies on a more consistent number of septic patients will definitively assess whether proadrenomedullin may replace the current prognostic markers in critically ill patients with shock due to sepsis.
AIM: It has been shown that pro-adrenomedullin is a good marker of the severity of septic shock but there are no data on the early changes in serum pro-adrenomedullin concentrations in patients with shock. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with septic shock and 21 healthy subjects studied as controls. Serum concentrations of pro-adrenomedullin, procalcitonin, ferritin, CRP and IL-6 were determined in all subjects at the initial observation. Patients with septic shock were also studied after 24 and 48 hours. RESULTS: The concentrations of the acute phase proteins were significantly higher in patients with septic shock than in the control subjects during the entire study period (P<0.001). Only procalcitonin significantly decreased on the third day of observation with respect to both the first day (P=0.002) and the second day (P=0.006). Proadrenomedullin (P=0.017) and IL-6 (P=0.001) showed an AUC significantly different from the null hypothesis in differentiating the patients who survived and those who did not. The sensitivity and specificity of pro-adrenomedullin in the assessment of death were 71.4% and 72.7%, respectively, while IL-6 had a sensitivity of 92.9% and a specificity of 60.6%. CONCLUSION: Proadrenomedullin is a reliable prognostic marker in patients with shock; further studies on a more consistent number of septic patients will definitively assess whether proadrenomedullin may replace the current prognostic markers in critically illpatients with shock due to sepsis.