BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Boceprevir is a novel inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus NS3 protease and was recently approved for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of impaired hepatic or renal function on boceprevir pharmacokinetics and safety/tolerability. METHODS: We conducted two open-label, single-dose, parallel-group studies comparing the safety and pharmacokinetics of boceprevir in patients with varying degrees of hepatic impairment compared with healthy controls in one study and patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on haemodialysis with healthy controls in the other. Patients with hepatic impairment (mild [n = 6], moderate [n = 6], severe [n = 6] and healthy controls [n = 6]) received a single dose of boceprevir (400 mg) on day 1, and whole blood was collected at selected timepoints up to 72 hours postdose to measure plasma drug concentrations. Patients with ESRD and healthy subjects received a single dose of boceprevir 800 mg orally on days 1 and 4, with samples for pharmacokinetic analyses collected at selected timepoints up to 48 hours postdose on both days. In addition, 4 hours after dosing on day 4, patients with ESRD underwent haemodialysis with arterial and venous blood samples collected up to 8 hours postdose. RESULTS: In the hepatic impairment study, there was a trend toward increased mean maximum (peak) plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of boceprevir with increasing severity of liver impairment. Point estimates for the geometric mean ratio for C(max) ranged from 100% in patients with mild hepatic impairment to 161% in patients with severe hepatic impairment, with the geometric mean ratio for AUC ranging from 91% in patients with mild hepatic impairment to 149% for patients with severe hepatic impairment, relative to healthy subjects. The mean elimination half-life (t(1/2;)) and median time to C(max) (t(max)) values of boceprevir were similar in healthy subjects and patients with hepatic impairment. In the renal impairment study, mean boceprevir C(max) and AUC values were comparable in patients with ESRD and in healthy subjects, with point estimates for the geometric mean ratio of 81% and 90%, respectively, compared with healthy subjects. Mean t(1/2;), median t(max) and mean apparent oral total clearance (CL/F) values were similar in healthy subjects and patients with ESRD. Boceprevir exposure was also similar in patients with ESRD on day 1 (no dialysis) and day 4 (dialysis beginning 4 hours postdose), with point estimates for the geometric mean ratio of C(max) and AUC to the last measurable sampling time (AUC(last)) on day 1 compared with day 4 of 88% and 98%, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in one patient with severe hepatic impairment (mild vomiting) and two patients with ESRD (moderate ventricular extrasystoles, flatulence and catheter thrombosis). CONCLUSION: In the present studies, the pharmacokinetic properties of boceprevir were not altered to a clinically meaningful extent in patients with impaired liver or renal function. These data indicate that boceprevir dose adjustment is not warranted in patients with impaired hepatic function or ESRD, including those receiving dialysis. Boceprevir is not removed by haemodialysis.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Boceprevir is a novel inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus NS3 protease and was recently approved for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of impaired hepatic or renal function on boceprevir pharmacokinetics and safety/tolerability. METHODS: We conducted two open-label, single-dose, parallel-group studies comparing the safety and pharmacokinetics of boceprevir in patients with varying degrees of hepatic impairment compared with healthy controls in one study and patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on haemodialysis with healthy controls in the other. Patients with hepatic impairment (mild [n = 6], moderate [n = 6], severe [n = 6] and healthy controls [n = 6]) received a single dose of boceprevir (400 mg) on day 1, and whole blood was collected at selected timepoints up to 72 hours postdose to measure plasma drug concentrations. Patients with ESRD and healthy subjects received a single dose of boceprevir 800 mg orally on days 1 and 4, with samples for pharmacokinetic analyses collected at selected timepoints up to 48 hours postdose on both days. In addition, 4 hours after dosing on day 4, patients with ESRD underwent haemodialysis with arterial and venous blood samples collected up to 8 hours postdose. RESULTS: In the hepatic impairment study, there was a trend toward increased mean maximum (peak) plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of boceprevir with increasing severity of liver impairment. Point estimates for the geometric mean ratio for C(max) ranged from 100% in patients with mild hepatic impairment to 161% in patients with severe hepatic impairment, with the geometric mean ratio for AUC ranging from 91% in patients with mild hepatic impairment to 149% for patients with severe hepatic impairment, relative to healthy subjects. The mean elimination half-life (t(1/2;)) and median time to C(max) (t(max)) values of boceprevir were similar in healthy subjects and patients with hepatic impairment. In the renal impairment study, mean boceprevir C(max) and AUC values were comparable in patients with ESRD and in healthy subjects, with point estimates for the geometric mean ratio of 81% and 90%, respectively, compared with healthy subjects. Mean t(1/2;), median t(max) and mean apparent oral total clearance (CL/F) values were similar in healthy subjects and patients with ESRD. Boceprevir exposure was also similar in patients with ESRD on day 1 (no dialysis) and day 4 (dialysis beginning 4 hours postdose), with point estimates for the geometric mean ratio of C(max) and AUC to the last measurable sampling time (AUC(last)) on day 1 compared with day 4 of 88% and 98%, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in one patient with severe hepatic impairment (mild vomiting) and two patients with ESRD (moderate ventricular extrasystoles, flatulence and catheter thrombosis). CONCLUSION: In the present studies, the pharmacokinetic properties of boceprevir were not altered to a clinically meaningful extent in patients with impaired liver or renal function. These data indicate that boceprevir dose adjustment is not warranted in patients with impaired hepatic function or ESRD, including those receiving dialysis. Boceprevir is not removed by haemodialysis.
Authors: Bruce R Bacon; Stuart C Gordon; Eric Lawitz; Patrick Marcellin; John M Vierling; Stefan Zeuzem; Fred Poordad; Zachary D Goodman; Heather L Sings; Navdeep Boparai; Margaret Burroughs; Clifford A Brass; Janice K Albrecht; Rafael Esteban Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-03-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paul Y Kwo; Eric J Lawitz; Jonathan McCone; Eugene R Schiff; John M Vierling; David Pound; Mitchell N Davis; Joseph S Galati; Stuart C Gordon; Natarajan Ravendhran; Lorenzo Rossaro; Frank H Anderson; Ira M Jacobson; Raymond Rubin; Kenneth Koury; Lisa D Pedicone; Clifford A Brass; Eirum Chaudhri; Janice K Albrecht Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-08-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Harald Farnik; Juliane El-Duweik; Christoph Welsch; Christoph Sarrazin; Jörn Lötsch; Stefan Zeuzem; Gerd Geisslinger; Helmut Schmidt Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2009-10-14 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: B A Malcolm; R Liu; F Lahser; S Agrawal; B Belanger; N Butkiewicz; R Chase; F Gheyas; A Hart; D Hesk; P Ingravallo; C Jiang; R Kong; J Lu; J Pichardo; A Prongay; A Skelton; X Tong; S Venkatraman; E Xia; V Girijavallabhan; F G Njoroge Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Sauzanne Khalilieh; Hwa-Ping Feng; Ellen G J Hulskotte; Larissa A Wenning; Joan R Butterton Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Brian B Gowen; Eric J Sefing; Jonna B Westover; Donald F Smee; Joseph Hagloch; Yousuke Furuta; Jeffery O Hall Journal: Antiviral Res Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 5.970
Authors: Roberto J Carvalho-Filho; Ana Cristina C A Feldner; Antonio Eduardo B Silva; Maria Lucia G Ferraz Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-01-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Clara T M M de Kanter; Joost P H Drenth; Joop E Arends; Henk W Reesink; Marc van der Valk; Robert J de Knegt; David M Burger Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 5.577