Literature DB >> 22798926

1-(2-Meth-oxy-phen-yl)-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione.

Muhammad Sirajuddin, Saqib Ali, M Nawaz Tahir.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(11)H(9)NO(3), the dihedral angle between the meth-oxy-benzene and 1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione rings is 75.60 (10)°. The C atom of the meth-oxy group is close to coplanar with its attached ring [deviation = 0.208 (2) Å]. In the crystal, weak aromatic π-π stacking [centroid-centroid separation = 3.8563 (13) Å] occurs between inversion-related pairs of benzene rings.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22798926      PMCID: PMC3394061          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812026888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For a related structure, see: Carroll et al., (2011 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C11H9NO3 M = 203.19 Monoclinic, a = 12.7018 (15) Å b = 10.2689 (12) Å c = 7.4695 (8) Å β = 101.067 (7)° V = 956.16 (19) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.10 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.23 mm

Data collection

Bruker Kappa APEXII CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.969, T max = 0.977 7388 measured reflections 1887 independent reflections 1267 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.030

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.041 wR(F 2) = 0.112 S = 1.01 1887 reflections 137 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.11 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.19 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶) and PLATON. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812026888/hb6853sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812026888/hb6853Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812026888/hb6853Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C11H9NO3F(000) = 424
Mr = 203.19Dx = 1.412 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 1267 reflections
a = 12.7018 (15) Åθ = 1.6–26.0°
b = 10.2689 (12) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
c = 7.4695 (8) ÅT = 296 K
β = 101.067 (7)°Prism, light yellow
V = 956.16 (19) Å30.30 × 0.25 × 0.23 mm
Z = 4
Bruker Kappa APEXII CCD diffractometer1887 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1267 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.030
Detector resolution: 8.00 pixels mm-1θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 1.9°
ω scansh = −12→15
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2005)k = −12→9
Tmin = 0.969, Tmax = 0.977l = −9→9
7388 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.112H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.01w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.051P)2 + 0.1053P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1887 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
137 parametersΔρmax = 0.11 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.19 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.20496 (11)0.44118 (13)−0.18267 (18)0.0604 (4)
O20.08846 (11)0.44793 (14)0.1941 (2)0.0692 (5)
O30.28200 (11)0.79126 (14)0.0549 (2)0.0724 (5)
N10.20700 (11)0.59539 (14)0.11254 (19)0.0438 (4)
C10.29485 (14)0.51130 (17)0.1042 (3)0.0447 (4)
C20.29351 (15)0.43286 (17)−0.0476 (3)0.0476 (5)
C30.38002 (18)0.35292 (19)−0.0525 (3)0.0619 (6)
H30.38000.2986−0.15220.074*
C40.46654 (18)0.3536 (2)0.0903 (4)0.0708 (7)
H40.52500.30010.08540.085*
C50.46810 (18)0.4312 (2)0.2383 (3)0.0698 (7)
H50.52710.43080.33380.084*
C60.38151 (16)0.5103 (2)0.2455 (3)0.0577 (5)
H60.38180.56330.34650.069*
C70.2079 (2)0.3746 (2)−0.3493 (3)0.0789 (7)
H7A0.26840.4044−0.39780.118*
H7B0.14300.3920−0.43550.118*
H7C0.21420.2827−0.32670.118*
C80.11142 (15)0.55756 (19)0.1598 (2)0.0478 (5)
C90.04849 (15)0.6775 (2)0.1639 (3)0.0556 (5)
H9−0.02080.68160.18710.067*
C100.10532 (15)0.7772 (2)0.1297 (3)0.0560 (5)
H100.08400.86390.12800.067*
C110.20922 (15)0.72958 (18)0.0941 (2)0.0489 (5)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0631 (9)0.0606 (9)0.0594 (9)0.0035 (7)0.0164 (7)−0.0146 (7)
O20.0603 (9)0.0562 (9)0.0953 (12)−0.0116 (7)0.0252 (8)0.0111 (8)
O30.0643 (9)0.0516 (9)0.1068 (12)−0.0081 (8)0.0303 (9)0.0103 (8)
N10.0435 (8)0.0362 (8)0.0552 (9)−0.0021 (7)0.0183 (7)−0.0045 (7)
C10.0419 (10)0.0386 (10)0.0578 (12)0.0002 (8)0.0198 (9)0.0032 (8)
C20.0498 (11)0.0381 (10)0.0600 (12)0.0010 (9)0.0232 (10)0.0045 (8)
C30.0695 (14)0.0451 (12)0.0814 (15)0.0089 (11)0.0403 (13)0.0056 (10)
C40.0571 (14)0.0572 (15)0.107 (2)0.0192 (11)0.0393 (14)0.0293 (14)
C50.0532 (13)0.0739 (16)0.0824 (17)0.0082 (12)0.0137 (12)0.0250 (14)
C60.0539 (12)0.0576 (13)0.0621 (13)−0.0011 (10)0.0125 (10)0.0076 (10)
C70.0974 (18)0.0750 (16)0.0687 (15)−0.0085 (14)0.0271 (13)−0.0231 (12)
C80.0437 (11)0.0507 (12)0.0504 (11)−0.0071 (9)0.0129 (9)−0.0012 (9)
C90.0436 (10)0.0657 (14)0.0598 (12)0.0055 (10)0.0155 (9)−0.0050 (10)
C100.0547 (12)0.0471 (12)0.0665 (13)0.0090 (10)0.0123 (10)−0.0067 (9)
C110.0497 (11)0.0431 (11)0.0546 (11)−0.0018 (9)0.0121 (9)−0.0012 (9)
O1—C21.362 (2)C4—H40.9300
O1—C71.426 (2)C5—C61.377 (3)
O2—C81.203 (2)C5—H50.9300
O3—C111.202 (2)C6—H60.9300
N1—C81.383 (2)C7—H7A0.9600
N1—C111.386 (2)C7—H7B0.9600
N1—C11.422 (2)C7—H7C0.9600
C1—C61.371 (3)C8—C91.471 (3)
C1—C21.388 (3)C9—C101.307 (3)
C2—C31.378 (3)C9—H90.9300
C3—C41.377 (3)C10—C111.479 (3)
C3—H30.9300C10—H100.9300
C4—C51.360 (3)
C2—O1—C7117.40 (17)C1—C6—H6119.9
C8—N1—C11109.89 (15)C5—C6—H6119.9
C8—N1—C1125.12 (15)O1—C7—H7A109.5
C11—N1—C1124.64 (15)O1—C7—H7B109.5
C6—C1—C2120.45 (18)H7A—C7—H7B109.5
C6—C1—N1119.44 (17)O1—C7—H7C109.5
C2—C1—N1120.10 (17)H7A—C7—H7C109.5
O1—C2—C3124.53 (18)H7B—C7—H7C109.5
O1—C2—C1116.59 (16)O2—C8—N1125.28 (18)
C3—C2—C1118.9 (2)O2—C8—C9128.61 (18)
C4—C3—C2119.9 (2)N1—C8—C9106.09 (16)
C4—C3—H3120.1C10—C9—C8109.24 (17)
C2—C3—H3120.1C10—C9—H9125.4
C5—C4—C3121.2 (2)C8—C9—H9125.4
C5—C4—H4119.4C9—C10—C11108.73 (17)
C3—C4—H4119.4C9—C10—H10125.6
C4—C5—C6119.4 (2)C11—C10—H10125.6
C4—C5—H5120.3O3—C11—N1125.41 (17)
C6—C5—H5120.3O3—C11—C10128.60 (18)
C1—C6—C5120.3 (2)N1—C11—C10105.98 (16)
C8—N1—C1—C6−100.8 (2)N1—C1—C6—C5−178.87 (17)
C11—N1—C1—C671.7 (2)C4—C5—C6—C1−0.3 (3)
C8—N1—C1—C280.5 (2)C11—N1—C8—O2−176.12 (18)
C11—N1—C1—C2−107.0 (2)C1—N1—C8—O2−2.7 (3)
C7—O1—C2—C3−8.0 (3)C11—N1—C8—C92.25 (19)
C7—O1—C2—C1172.00 (17)C1—N1—C8—C9175.70 (16)
C6—C1—C2—O1−179.12 (16)O2—C8—C9—C10175.7 (2)
N1—C1—C2—O1−0.4 (2)N1—C8—C9—C10−2.6 (2)
C6—C1—C2—C30.9 (3)C8—C9—C10—C111.9 (2)
N1—C1—C2—C3179.59 (15)C8—N1—C11—O3179.57 (19)
O1—C2—C3—C4178.86 (17)C1—N1—C11—O36.1 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4−1.1 (3)C8—N1—C11—C10−1.15 (19)
C2—C3—C4—C50.7 (3)C1—N1—C11—C10−174.64 (16)
C3—C4—C5—C60.1 (3)C9—C10—C11—O3178.7 (2)
C2—C1—C6—C5−0.1 (3)C9—C10—C11—N1−0.5 (2)
  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  A molecular balance for measuring aliphatic CH-π interactions.

Authors:  William R Carroll; Chen Zhao; Mark D Smith; Perry J Pellechia; Ken D Shimizu
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 6.005

3.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Hirshfeld surface analysis and crystal structure of N-(2-meth-oxy-phen-yl)acetamide.

Authors:  Mavise Yaman; Necmi Dege; Mzgin M Ayoob; Awaz J Hussein; Mohammed K Samad; Igor O Fritsky
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2019-05-21

2.  2-(2-Meth-oxy-phen-yl)-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione.

Authors:  M Nawaz Tahir; Muhammad Sirajuddin; Saqib Ali; Khurram Shahzad Munawar
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-07-28

3.  1-(4-Meth-oxy-phen-yl)pyrrolidine-2,5-dione.

Authors:  Muhammad Sirajuddin; Saqib Ali
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2013-08-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.