Literature DB >> 22798029

Concept abstractness and the representation of noun-noun combinations.

Xu Xu1, Lisa Paulson.   

Abstract

Research on noun-noun combinations has been largely focusing on concrete concepts. Three experiments examined the role of concept abstractness in the representation of noun-noun combinations. In Experiment 1, participants provided written interpretations for phrases constituted by nouns of varying degrees of abstractness. Interpretive focus (the modifier, the head noun, or both) for each noun-noun phrase was evaluated. In Experiment 2, a different group of participants directly indicated which noun, the modifier or the head noun, was the focus of the meaning of each noun-noun phrase. Finally, participants in Experiment 3 assessed similarity of noun-noun phrases with overlapping modifiers. If abstractness of constituent nouns affects information distribution between modifier and head noun, it would accordingly affect similarity ratings for noun-noun phrases with overlapping modifiers. Results showed that the pattern of information distribution within a noun-noun phrase differed between phrases with abstract head nouns and phrases with concrete head nouns. Specifically, the center of representation was more on the head noun side for phrases with concrete head nouns, whereas the center seemed to shift to the direction of the modifier for phrases with abstract head nouns. Some issues related to effects of concept abstractness on noun-noun combinations are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22798029     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-012-9226-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  7 in total

1.  Interactive property attribution in concept combination.

Authors:  Z Estes; S Glucksberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-01

2.  What makes a man similar to a tie? Stimulus compatibility with comparison and integration.

Authors:  E J Wisniewski; M Bassok
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun-noun combinations.

Authors:  C L Gagné
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The role of salience in conceptual combination.

Authors:  J S Bock; C Clifton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-12

5.  Content differences for abstract and concrete concepts.

Authors:  Katja Katja Wiemer-Hastings; Xu Xu
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-09-10

6.  When concepts combine.

Authors:  E J Wisniewski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

7.  Context and structure in conceptual combination.

Authors:  D L Medin; E J Shoben
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.468

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.