PURPOSE: Physical activity (PA) is an important adjuvant component in all phases of the cancer disease and PA is important for better functioning, coping with the situation and overall quality of life (QoL). In order to achieve better scientific knowledge of the effect of PA in cancer survivors, it is of paramount importance to have validated and feasible assessment tools for PA. METHODS: This validation study, which was part of an open intervention study, used a cross-sectional and a longitudinal design. The HUNT 1 physical activity questionnaire (HUNT 1 PA-Q) was compared to the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and aerobic capacity. The participants were cancer survivors with different diagnoses attending an inpatient rehabilitation program partly focusing on physical training. RESULTS: The correlations between HUNT 1 PA-Q and IPAQ were 0.41 at pre-test and 0.57 at post-test, and sensitivity to change (effect size) was 0.42 for both questionnaires. VO(2 max) demonstrated high sensitivity to change (0.68) and low correlations with HUNT 1 PA-Q (0.30 at pre-test and 0.21 at post-test). There were 13 incomplete HUNT 1 PA-Q forms and 48 incomplete IPAQ forms during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: HUNT 1 PA-Q is considered suitable for use in cancer survivors and should be preferred to IPAQ because it was easier to fill in and provided more complete data. Aerobic capacity measures other aspect of PA and should be used as a supplement to PA questionnaire when the aim is to capture health effects related to aerobic capacity.
PURPOSE: Physical activity (PA) is an important adjuvant component in all phases of the cancer disease and PA is important for better functioning, coping with the situation and overall quality of life (QoL). In order to achieve better scientific knowledge of the effect of PA in cancer survivors, it is of paramount importance to have validated and feasible assessment tools for PA. METHODS: This validation study, which was part of an open intervention study, used a cross-sectional and a longitudinal design. The HUNT 1 physical activity questionnaire (HUNT 1 PA-Q) was compared to the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and aerobic capacity. The participants were cancer survivors with different diagnoses attending an inpatient rehabilitation program partly focusing on physical training. RESULTS: The correlations between HUNT 1 PA-Q and IPAQ were 0.41 at pre-test and 0.57 at post-test, and sensitivity to change (effect size) was 0.42 for both questionnaires. VO(2 max) demonstrated high sensitivity to change (0.68) and low correlations with HUNT 1 PA-Q (0.30 at pre-test and 0.21 at post-test). There were 13 incomplete HUNT 1 PA-Q forms and 48 incomplete IPAQ forms during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: HUNT 1 PA-Q is considered suitable for use in cancer survivors and should be preferred to IPAQ because it was easier to fill in and provided more complete data. Aerobic capacity measures other aspect of PA and should be used as a supplement to PA questionnaire when the aim is to capture health effects related to aerobic capacity.
Authors: Mireille N M van Poppel; Mai J M Chinapaw; Lidwine B Mokkink; Willem van Mechelen; Caroline B Terwee Journal: Sports Med Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Delphine Klein; Mariette Mercier; Edwige Abeilard; Marc Puyraveau; Arlette Danzon; Véronique Dalstein; Astrid Pozet; Anne-Valérie Guizard; Michel Henry-Amar; Michel Velten Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-02-22 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Kenneth Fearon; Florian Strasser; Stefan D Anker; Ingvar Bosaeus; Eduardo Bruera; Robin L Fainsinger; Aminah Jatoi; Charles Loprinzi; Neil MacDonald; Giovanni Mantovani; Mellar Davis; Maurizio Muscaritoli; Faith Ottery; Lukas Radbruch; Paula Ravasco; Declan Walsh; Andrew Wilcock; Stein Kaasa; Vickie E Baracos Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-02-04 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: William L Haskell; I-Min Lee; Russell R Pate; Kenneth E Powell; Steven N Blair; Barry A Franklin; Caroline A Macera; Gregory W Heath; Paul D Thompson; Adrian Bauman Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: A Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou; G S Metsios; J P Smith; V F Panoulas; K M J Douglas; A Z Jamurtas; Y Koutedakis; G D Kitas Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2009-10-27 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Charles H Bombardier; Jesse R Fann; Evette J Ludman; Steven D Vannoy; Joshua R Dyer; Jason K Barber; Nancy R Temkin Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2017 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: F Hausmann; V V Iversen; M Kristoffersen; H Gundersen; E Johannsson; M Vika Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-04-14 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Iris M Kanera; Catherine A W Bolman; Ilse Mesters; Roy A Willems; Audrey A J M Beaulen; Lilian Lechner Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Jon Arne Sandmæl; Asta Bye; Tora S Solheim; Trude R Balstad; Lene Thorsen; Eva Skovlund; Stein Kaasa; Jo-Åsmund Lund; Line Oldervoll Journal: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Date: 2020-03-17