Literature DB >> 22797840

Pathological features and prognosis of different molecular subtypes of breast cancer.

Guo-Sheng Wang1, Hong Zhu, Shi-Jie Bi.   

Abstract

To examine the pathological features and prognosis of different molecular subtypes of breast cancer, the clinical data of 892 breast cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed and divided into four subtypes according to hormone receptor expression in breast cancer tissue: Her-2 overexpression, luminal A, luminal B and basal-like subtypes. The pathological data and prognosis of these subtypes were compared. Of the 892 breast cancer patients, there were 46 cases (5.2%) with Her-2 overexpression-type, 698 cases (78.3%) with luminal A-type, 38 cases (4.3%) with luminal B-type and 110 patients (12.2%) with basal-like-type. Immunohistochemistry was used to identify the progesterone and estrogen receptors in the tumor tissues. The χ2 test was used to verify the measurement data. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used for the univariate and multivariate analyses. Results showed there was no statistical difference for lymphatic metastasis among the various molecular subtypes of breast cancer (P>0.05). The distant metastatic rate of patients with Her-2-type breast cancer was significantly higher compared to patients with the other three subtypes (P<0.05). The difference in local recurrence among molecular subtypes was not significantly significant (P>0.05). Lymph node metastasis, age and different molecular subtypes were found to have an impact on patient overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Her-2 overexpression-type breast cancer patients had the lowest 9-year DFS and 7-year OS compared to the other subtypes (P<0.05). Thus, Her-2-type was associated with the worst prognosis. In conlusion, the molecular typing of breast cancer has important clinical value in prognosis estimation and is expected to affect breast cancer treatment approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22797840     DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2012.981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Med Rep        ISSN: 1791-2997            Impact factor:   2.952


  18 in total

1.  Progressive loss of anti-HER2 CD4+ T-helper type 1 response in breast tumorigenesis and the potential for immune restoration.

Authors:  Jashodeep Datta; Cinthia Rosemblit; Erik Berk; Lori Showalter; Prachi Namjoshi; Rosemarie Mick; Kathreen P Lee; Andrew M Brod; Rachel L Yang; Rachel R Kelz; Elizabeth Fitzpatrick; Clifford Hoyt; Michael D Feldman; Paul J Zhang; Shuwen Xu; Gary K Koski; Brian J Czerniecki
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 8.110

2.  Trends and present treatment patterns of early breast cancer in Southwest China.

Authors:  Qiancheng Hu; Ting Luo; Ping He; Xiaorong Zhong; Tinglun Tian; Qing Lv; Xi Yan; Hong Zheng
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  CD4(+) T-Helper Type 1 Cytokines and Trastuzumab Facilitate CD8(+) T-cell Targeting of HER2/neu-Expressing Cancers.

Authors:  Jashodeep Datta; Shuwen Xu; Cinthia Rosemblit; Jenessa B Smith; Jessica A Cintolo; Daniel J Powell; Brian J Czerniecki
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 11.151

4.  Heterologous Prime-Boost Enhances the Antitumor Immune Response Elicited by Plant-Virus-Based Cancer Vaccine.

Authors:  Hui Cai; Sourabh Shukla; Chao Wang; Hema Masarapu; Nicole F Steinmetz
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Radioiodinated Ethinylestradiol Derivatives for Estrogen Receptor Targeting Breast Cancer Imaging.

Authors:  Huanhuan Liu; Xiaoru Lin; Duo Xu; Jingchao Li; Jianyang Fang; Jindian Li; Lingxin Meng; Xinying Zeng; Yesen Li; Jinxiong Huang; Zhide Guo; Xianzhong Zhang
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.345

6.  Differences in Clinical Outcomes between Luminal A and B Type Breast Cancers according to the St. Gallen Consensus 2013.

Authors:  Hyo Jung Ahn; Soo Jin Jung; Tae Hyun Kim; Min Kyung Oh; Hye-Kyoung Yoon
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.588

7.  Anti-HER2 CD4(+) T-helper type 1 response is a novel immune correlate to pathologic response following neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Jashodeep Datta; Erik Berk; Shuwen Xu; Elizabeth Fitzpatrick; Cinthia Rosemblit; Lea Lowenfeld; Noah Goodman; David A Lewis; Paul J Zhang; Carla Fisher; Robert E Roses; Angela DeMichele; Brian J Czerniecki
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Ki67 as a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Haitao Li; Xinghua Han; Yingxin Liu; Guodong Liu; Guomin Dong
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Aberrant high expression of immunoglobulin G in epithelial stem/progenitor-like cells contributes to tumor initiation and metastasis.

Authors:  Qinyuan Liao; Wei Liu; Yang Liu; Fulin Wang; Chong Wang; Jingxuan Zhang; Ming Chu; Dongyang Jiang; Lin Xiao; Wenwei Shao; Zhengzuo Sheng; Xia Tao; Lei Huo; C Cameron Yin; Youhui Zhang; Gregory Lee; Jing Huang; Zihai Li; Xiaoyan Qiu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-11-24

10.  Discordance in ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 Expression Between Primary and Recurrent/Metastatic Lesions in Patients with Primary Early Stage Breast Cancer and the Clinical Significance: Retrospective Analysis of 75 Cases.

Authors:  Li Peng; Zhen Zhang; Dachun Zhao; Jialin Zhao; Feng Mao; Qiang Sun
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.201

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.