Literature DB >> 22797642

Association between use of interferon beta and progression of disability in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Afsaneh Shirani1, Yinshan Zhao, Mohammad Ehsanul Karim, Charity Evans, Elaine Kingwell, Mia L van der Kop, Joel Oger, Paul Gustafson, John Petkau, Helen Tremlett.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Interferon beta is widely prescribed to treat multiple sclerosis (MS); however, its relationship with disability progression has yet to be established.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between interferon beta exposure and disability progression in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Retrospective cohort study based on prospectively collected data (1985-2008) from British Columbia, Canada. Patients with relapsing-remitting MS treated with interferon beta (n = 868) were compared with untreated contemporary (n = 829) and historical (n = 959) cohorts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was time from interferon beta treatment eligibility (baseline) to a confirmed and sustained score of 6 (requiring a cane to walk 100 m; confirmed at >150 days with no measurable improvement) on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (range, 0-10, with higher scores indicating higher disability). A multivariable Cox regression model with interferon beta treatment included as a time-varying covariate was used to assess the hazard of disease progression associated with interferon beta treatment. Analyses also included propensity score adjustment to address confounding by indication.
RESULTS: The median active follow-up times (first to last EDSS measurement) were as follows: for the interferon beta-treated cohort, 5.1 years (interquartile range [IQR], 3.0-7.0 years); for the contemporary control cohort, 4.0 years (IQR, 2.1-6.4 years); and for the historical control cohort, 10.8 years (IQR, 6.3-14.7 years). The observed outcome rates for reaching a sustained EDSS score of 6 were 10.8%, 5.3%, and 23.1% in the 3 cohorts, respectively. After adjustment for potential baseline confounders (sex, age, disease duration, and EDSS score), exposure to interferon beta was not associated with a statistically significant difference in the hazard of reaching an EDSS score of 6 when either the contemporary control cohort (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.92-1.83; P = .14) or the historical control cohort (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.58-1.02; P = .07) were considered. Further adjustment for comorbidities and socioeconomic status, where possible, did not change interpretations, and propensity score adjustment did not substantially change the results.
CONCLUSION: Among patients with relapsing-remitting MS, administration of interferon beta was not associated with a reduction in progression of disability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22797642     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.7625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  77 in total

Review 1.  Treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis - insights from real-world observational studies.

Authors:  Maria Trojano; Mar Tintore; Xavier Montalban; Jan Hillert; Tomas Kalincik; Pietro Iaffaldano; Tim Spelman; Maria Pia Sormani; Helmut Butzkueven
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  NADH-dehydrogenase type-2 suppresses irreversible visual loss and neurodegeneration in the EAE animal model of MS.

Authors:  Venu Talla; Hong Yu; Tsung-Han Chou; Vittorio Porciatti; Vince Chiodo; Sanford L Boye; William W Hauswirth; Alfred S Lewin; John Guy
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 11.454

3.  [Retrovirus superantigen hypothesis of multiple sclerosis].

Authors:  A Emmer; M S Staege; M E Kornhuber
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 4.  Can we measure long-term treatment effects in multiple sclerosis?

Authors:  Maria Pia Sormani; Paolo Bruzzi
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Disease-modifying therapies for nonrelapsing multiple sclerosis: Costs and benefits of medical intervention.

Authors:  David E Jones
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2013-12

6.  Switching therapies in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Patricia K Coyle
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 7.  Drug therapy for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Eleonora Tavazzi; Marco Rovaris; Loredana La Mantia
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Fractional anisotropy of white matter, disability and blood iron parameters in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Estelle Herbert; Penelope Engel-Hills; Coenraad Hattingh; Jean-Paul Fouche; Martin Kidd; Christine Lochner; Maritha J Kotze; Susan J van Rensburg
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.584

9.  Marginal structural Cox models for estimating the association between β-interferon exposure and disease progression in a multiple sclerosis cohort.

Authors:  Mohammad Ehsanul Karim; Paul Gustafson; John Petkau; Yinshan Zhao; Afsaneh Shirani; Elaine Kingwell; Charity Evans; Mia van der Kop; Joel Oger; Helen Tremlett
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 10.  Regulation of human glia by multiple sclerosis disease modifying therapies.

Authors:  Luke M Healy; Mackenzie A Michell-Robinson; Jack P Antel
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 9.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.