Literature DB >> 22796873

Enriching amnestic mild cognitive impairment populations for clinical trials: optimal combination of biomarkers to predict conversion to dementia.

Peng Yu1, Robert A Dean, Stephen D Hall, Yuan Qi, Gopalan Sethuraman, Brian A Willis, Eric R Siemers, Ferenc Martenyi, Johannes T Tauscher, Adam J Schwarz.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to identify the optimal combination of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers to predict conversion from amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) to Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia within two years, for enriching clinical trial populations. Data from 63 subjects in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative aMCI cohort who had MRI and FDG-PET imaging along with CSF data at baseline and at least two years clinical follow-up were used. A Bayesian classification method was used to determine which combination of 31 variables (MRI, FDG-PET, CSF measurements, apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotype, and cognitive scores) provided the most accurate prediction of aMCI to AD conversion. The cost and time trade-offs for the use of these biomarkers as inclusion criteria in clinical trials were evaluated. Using the combination of all biomarkers, ApoE genotype, and cognitive scores, we achieved an accuracy of 81% in predicting aMCI to AD conversion. With only ApoE genotype and cognitive scores, the prediction accuracy decreased to 62%. By comparing individual modalities, we found that MRI measures had the best predictive power (accuracy = 78%), followed by ApoE, FDG-PET, CSF, and the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale. The combination of biomarkers from different modalities, measuring complementary aspects of AD pathology, provided the most accurate prediction of aMCI to AD conversion within two years. This was predominantly driven by MRI measures, which emerged as the single most powerful modality. Overall, the combination of MRI, ApoE, and cognitive scores provided the best trade-off between cost and time compared with other biomarker combinations for patient recruitment in clinical trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22796873     DOI: 10.3233/JAD-2012-120832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis        ISSN: 1387-2877            Impact factor:   4.472


  14 in total

1.  Early identification of MCI converting to AD: a FDG PET study.

Authors:  Marco Pagani; Flavio Nobili; Silvia Morbelli; Dario Arnaldi; Alessandro Giuliani; Johanna Öberg; Nicola Girtler; Andrea Brugnolo; Agnese Picco; Matteo Bauckneht; Roberta Piva; Andrea Chincarini; Gianmario Sambuceti; Cathrine Jonsson; Fabrizio De Carli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  2014 Update of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: A review of papers published since its inception.

Authors:  Michael W Weiner; Dallas P Veitch; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; Nigel J Cairns; Jesse Cedarbaum; Robert C Green; Danielle Harvey; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; Johan Luthman; John C Morris; Ronald C Petersen; Andrew J Saykin; Leslie Shaw; Li Shen; Adam Schwarz; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 21.566

3.  Prognostic value of Alzheimer's biomarkers in mild cognitive impairment: the effect of age at onset.

Authors:  Daniele Altomare; Clarissa Ferrari; Anna Caroli; Samantha Galluzzi; Annapaola Prestia; Wiesje M van der Flier; Rik Ossenkoppele; Bart Van Berckel; Frederik Barkhof; Charlotte E Teunissen; Anders Wall; Stephen F Carter; Michael Schöll; I L Han Choo; Timo Grimmer; Alberto Redolfi; Agneta Nordberg; Philip Scheltens; Alexander Drzezga; Giovanni B Frisoni
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Operationalizing hippocampal volume as an enrichment biomarker for amnestic mild cognitive impairment trials: effect of algorithm, test-retest variability, and cut point on trial cost, duration, and sample size.

Authors:  Peng Yu; Jia Sun; Robin Wolz; Diane Stephenson; James Brewer; Nick C Fox; Patricia E Cole; Clifford R Jack; Derek L G Hill; Adam J Schwarz
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 5.  Efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation therapies for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in older adults: working toward a theoretical model and evidence-based interventions.

Authors:  Marilyn Huckans; Lee Hutson; Elizabeth Twamley; Amy Jak; Jeffrey Kaye; Daniel Storzbach
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 7.444

6.  Towards precision medicine in Alzheimer's disease: deciphering genetic data to establish informative biomarkers.

Authors:  Ornit Chiba-Falek; Michael W Lutz
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2017-02-01

Review 7.  Genetic analysis of quantitative phenotypes in AD and MCI: imaging, cognition and biomarkers.

Authors:  Li Shen; Paul M Thompson; Steven G Potkin; Lars Bertram; Lindsay A Farrer; Tatiana M Foroud; Robert C Green; Xiaolan Hu; Matthew J Huentelman; Sungeun Kim; John S K Kauwe; Qingqin Li; Enchi Liu; Fabio Macciardi; Jason H Moore; Leanne Munsie; Kwangsik Nho; Vijay K Ramanan; Shannon L Risacher; David J Stone; Shanker Swaminathan; Arthur W Toga; Michael W Weiner; Andrew J Saykin
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.978

Review 8.  Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the detection of dementia in clinically unevaluated people aged 65 and over in community and primary care populations.

Authors:  Sam T Creavin; Susanna Wisniewski; Anna H Noel-Storr; Clare M Trevelyan; Thomas Hampton; Dane Rayment; Victoria M Thom; Kirsty J E Nash; Hosam Elhamoui; Rowena Milligan; Anish S Patel; Demitra V Tsivos; Tracey Wing; Emma Phillips; Sophie M Kellman; Hannah L Shackleton; Georgina F Singleton; Bethany E Neale; Martha E Watton; Sarah Cullum
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-13

9.  Enrichment of clinical trials in MCI due to AD using markers of amyloid and neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Robin Wolz; Adam J Schwarz; Katherine R Gray; Peng Yu; Derek L G Hill
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  A Genetics-based Biomarker Risk Algorithm for Predicting Risk of Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Michael W Lutz; Scott S Sundseth; Daniel K Burns; Ann M Saunders; Kathleen M Hayden; James R Burke; Kathleen A Welsh-Bohmer; Allen D Roses
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2016-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.