Literature DB >> 22796556

Spectral mixture analysis of EELS spectrum-images.

Nicolas Dobigeon1, Nathalie Brun.   

Abstract

Recent advances in detectors and computer science have enabled the acquisition and the processing of multidimensional datasets, in particular in the field of spectral imaging. Benefiting from these new developments, Earth scientists try to recover the reflectance spectra of macroscopic materials (e.g., water, grass, mineral types…) present in an observed scene and to estimate their respective proportions in each mixed pixel of the acquired image. This task is usually referred to as spectral mixture analysis or spectral unmixing (SU). SU aims at decomposing the measured pixel spectrum into a collection of constituent spectra, called endmembers, and a set of corresponding fractions (abundances) that indicate the proportion of each endmember present in the pixel. Similarly, when processing spectrum-images, microscopists usually try to map elemental, physical and chemical state information of a given material. This paper reports how a SU algorithm dedicated to remote sensing hyperspectral images can be successfully applied to analyze spectrum-image resulting from electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS). SU generally overcomes standard limitations inherent to other multivariate statistical analysis methods, such as principal component analysis (PCA) or independent component analysis (ICA), that have been previously used to analyze EELS maps. Indeed, ICA and PCA may perform poorly for linear spectral mixture analysis due to the strong dependence between the abundances of the different materials. One example is presented here to demonstrate the potential of this technique for EELS analysis.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22796556     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultramicroscopy        ISSN: 0304-3991            Impact factor:   2.689


  6 in total

1.  Solid-state electrochemistry on the nanometer and atomic scales: the scanning probe microscopy approach.

Authors:  Evgheni Strelcov; Sang Mo Yang; Stephen Jesse; Nina Balke; Rama K Vasudevan; Sergei V Kalinin
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 7.790

2.  Evaluation of EELS spectrum imaging data by spectral components and factors from multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Siyuan Zhang; Christina Scheu
Journal:  Microscopy (Oxf)       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 1.571

3.  Double-Bilayer polar nanoregions and Mn antisites in (Ca, Sr)3Mn2O7.

Authors:  Leixin Miao; Kishwar-E Hasin; Parivash Moradifar; Debangshu Mukherjee; Ke Wang; Sang-Wook Cheong; Elizabeth A Nowadnick; Nasim Alem
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Multicomponent signal unmixing from nanoheterostructures: overcoming the traditional challenges of nanoscale X-ray analysis via machine learning.

Authors:  David Rossouw; Pierre Burdet; Francisco de la Peña; Caterina Ducati; Benjamin R Knappett; Andrew E H Wheatley; Paul A Midgley
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 11.189

5.  Local coexistence of VO2 phases revealed by deep data analysis.

Authors:  Evgheni Strelcov; Anton Ievlev; Alex Belianinov; Alexander Tselev; Andrei Kolmakov; Sergei V Kalinin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Atomic-Scale Insights into Nickel Exsolution on LaNiO3 Catalysts via In Situ Electron Microscopy.

Authors:  Pengfei Cao; Pengyi Tang; Maged F Bekheet; Hongchu Du; Luyan Yang; Leander Haug; Albert Gili; Benjamin Bischoff; Aleksander Gurlo; Martin Kunz; Rafal E Dunin-Borkowski; Simon Penner; Marc Heggen
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 4.126

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.